November 27, 200817 yr My group is a bit of harmless fun and not a blatant attack on someone. Big difference. your group? c'mon :lol:
November 27, 200817 yr go watch manamana and tunak tunak people. and only come back when you know the dance moves by heart!! :dance:
November 27, 200817 yr go watch manamana and tunak tunak people. and only come back when you know the dance moves by heart!! :dance: when I'll have some free time I'll learn the song and i'll sing it to you :blush:
November 27, 200817 yr you're the one who keeps talking about the usual suspects even if me or ren are not reply to that thread... if we don't reply doesn't mean we're not watching the posts.. it's our job to watch threads Unnecessarily antagonising people has nothing to do with watching.
November 27, 200817 yr Look Mark, if you analyse this picture, perhaps you will have an idea of what we are getting at. Good day sir.
November 27, 200817 yr Unnecessarily antagonising people has nothing to do with watching. bus as a member, replying when you're talking about us is :wink: you're always talking about the usual suspects.. if you wouldn't do that probably we shouldn't have to talk to you.. c'mon express your own ideas!
November 27, 200817 yr your group? c'mon :lol: Yup. It was only formed as a direct response to the negative one and to prove an important point, which was that far more people appreciate me here than don't, whatever you and your buddies might suggest. ;)
November 27, 200817 yr Yup. It was only formed as a direct response to the negative one and to prove an important point, which was that far more people appreciate me here than don't, whatever you and your buddies might suggest. ;) You know that arrogance thing you keep accusing people of...
November 27, 200817 yr we never created a group against you... we don't need it and it's childlish.. I think that everyone has the right to express their opinion and don't be tagged because of that.. if I agree in one thing with another person doesn't mean I agree in everything and it's not a "i'm more popular than you" thing.. that's a bit unnecesary but anyway from what I can see you're not mr coldplaying or the friendliest user :wink:
November 27, 200817 yr Tunak Tunak is so 5 years ago then this means you had 5 years to learn the dance. where are the moves? where are the moves?
November 27, 200817 yr then this means you had 5 years to learn the dance. where are the moves? where are the moves? :bigcry: why did I never see that before?
November 27, 200817 yr :bigcry: why did I never see that before? Lore, I have a video of me and and my best friend's bf dancing it. no, it's not pretty. :laugh4:
November 27, 200817 yr Lore, I have a video of me and and my best friend's bf dancing it. no, it's not pretty. :laugh4: send it :bomb:
November 27, 200817 yr Author then this means you had 5 years to learn the dance. where are the moves? where are the moves? :lol:
November 27, 200817 yr send it :bomb: Noooo, you'll get your own video when you dance it with me!! :laugh4:
November 27, 200817 yr Noooo, you'll get your own video when you dance it with me!! :laugh4: you should come here someday.. we could dance it in the mountains :wacky:
November 27, 200817 yr I bet that if I were saying that nathan is pathetic, you would be just saying nice things to me No, because I know the only reason you're siding with him is because he's having a go at me. It's very transparent and doesn't carry any weight, I'm afraid. I also have an opinion and people is free to express their opinions :wink: True, but continually attacking members just because you don't like them or disagree with them is totally against the spirit of a forum, especially when you're supposed to set a good example.
November 27, 200817 yr Speaking of awesome asian music videos [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZA1NoOOoaNw]YouTube - Crazy Indian Video... Buffalaxed![/ame]
November 27, 200817 yr especially when you're supposed to set a good example. I think you are confusing "mod" with "parent"
November 27, 200817 yr No, because I know the only reason you're siding with him is because he's having a go at me. It's very transparent and doesn't carry any weight, I'm afraid. True, but continually attacking members just because you don't like them or disagree with them is totally against the spirit of a forum, especially when you're supposed to set a good example. you are also doing that I'm afraid.. you started with the usual suspects thing in another threads... if you would had keep your mouth shut I wouldn't even reply to this.. but you think that you can attack and then complain if you feel attacked... and that's just not fair... you hate us because we liked reilly... and that's quite sad i think
November 27, 200817 yr bus as a member, replying when you're talking about us is :wink: you're always talking about the usual suspects.. That's because it's true.;)
Create an account or sign in to comment