Yes, Simon. I'm sorry.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nina, your sig just made me laugh so loud in here!!! :laugh3: I tried to be a bit serious in this situation but that Balack's quote messed it up! :lol:

You couldn't make Coldplaying any better than it already is. =[

Hahaaaa, Balack - the other word for messing things up.

 

 

I'm sorry, but that quote is funny :embarassed:

Anyone misses that Balack guy??? :wink3: :wacky:

You can't make Coldplaying any better than it already is. =[

 

Of course you can! Attend the meeting on Satarday and you will see! ;)

you are funny

you are funny

 

:thinking:

I think I'll do something else.

 

I just don't see the point in doing all this in a forum that is already run perfectly, that already has fun scheduled events for everybody to participate in. Everybody can suggest things to Ian and everybody can hold their own events like arcade tournaments or whatever...I don't understand the purpose of this.

I think I'll do something else.

 

I just don't see the point in doing all this in a forum that is already run perfectly, that already has fun scheduled events for everybody to participate in. Everybody can suggest things to Ian and everybody can hold their own events like arcade tournaments or whatever...I don't understand the purpose of this.

 

Well okay, thats your opinion, we are not shoving it in peoples faces but the meetings are a nice place to brainstorm ideas AND we can help organise things ;)

Ill try and be there simon but I can't promise anything.

Anyone misses that Balack guy??? :wink3: :wacky:

 

 

 

Yeah i do,he was a blast,he was never really offensive towards me,i reckon it was a current/previous user,cos he was mean to some people and not others.

:thinking:

 

The thing is that people were asked on whether the committee was a good idea and the majority of the votes said No and you still went on with it.. it is what is making people upset. There is no need to have nicknames such as chairman to have something approved because you do know they have to be approved by someone correct and not by the chairman right? I think that you should removed all the names, remove CC at the top because it is confusing people with CCC. I understand that the committee supports the CCC which is all of us (we all support CCC) that's why there's a section for it but if you would really like to help the forum there is no need to have nicknames.. and there are ways to contribute to the forum. Anyone can contribute to the forum.

 

 

On the logos, I kinda like the red butterfly but that is just so similar to the postcards from far away logo.

^thats the reason why she has been here for so long. She has good opinions

Amen to that.

Indeed,you must listen to her now simon.

The thing is that people were asked on whether the committee was a good idea and the majority of the votes said No and you still went on with it.. it is what is making people upset. There is no need to have nicknames such as chairman to have something approved because you do know they have to be approved by someone correct and not by the chairman right? I think that you should removed all the names, remove CC at the top because it is confusing people with CCC. I understand that the committee supports the CCC which is all of us (we all support CCC) that's why there's a section for it but if you would really like to help the forum there is no need to have nicknames.. and there are ways to contribute to the forum. Anyone can contribute to the forum.

 

 

On the logos, I kinda like the red butterfly but that is just so similar to the postcards from far away logo.

My thoughts exactly! Well said Josce :D

well why don't we all vote for the worst one?

Sounds like a plan jack.

Great idea!

count me in

which one then?

How about the Pepsi/Korea logo?

count me out.

this one

 

 

 

 

 

 

those eyes scare me :bigcry:

I like the pacmen trying to eat the words "omittee" and "oldplaying"