January 30, 200917 yr The Grammys are one of those shows/events I have not watched in a couple years mainly because every attempt I've made to watch it have resulted in frustration. The best artists don't actually win, the performances are borderline annoying, and the acts are usually predictable. Mainstream hip hop and other music that makes me want to cry. But maybe things will be different this year? First of all Radiohead is playing. That has raised my curiousty. Also today they announced that U2 will be performing as well joining artists like Coldplay, Kayne West, and Carrie Underwood. More performers here: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1603763/20090129/rihanna.jhtml
January 30, 200917 yr I dunno. They haven't aired it live earlier so i don't think they'll do it this year either. I think i'll watch it when they'll air it later though..
January 30, 200917 yr oh hellz yeah I am with radiohead and U2 performing I am there for those two reasons alone. I truly hope that Radiohead walks away with at least one out of three grammys. Not that it really matters to them I just think it would be cool..
January 30, 200917 yr I've only watched them once or twice before, and when I have I haven't really paid attention... but I think I definitely will this year, mainly because of all the reasons you mentioned, Briggins.
January 30, 200917 yr Hell yeah, I am watching them! This is the best talent I can ever remember. U2, Coldplay, Radiohead, Robert Plant, Dave Grohl, and Paul McCartney. This is a no brainer.
January 30, 200917 yr mainly for radiohead, not just because of their performance but also to see if they win. also i'm watching to see mccartney play
January 30, 200917 yr its mandatory for music fans to watch the grammys. but only music nerds watch the pre show webcast where they hand out 90 of the 100+ awards. :) i've watched the webcast the last 3yrs and its more intereting than you would think. only two of radioheads 5 nominations will be announced on the night. the other 3 will be handed out in the pre show webcast. it starts approx 4hrs before the actual broadcast
January 30, 200917 yr Im excited to see this years show. I havent felt like Ive really wanted to watch the Grammy's in a while. My 2 favs are playing Coldplay will surely win some as well. U2 is always good to see and the Radiohead appearance almost blows my mind. It will be fun to watch, I think.
January 30, 200917 yr sorry to go off topic a bit for a moment. i was just thinking earlier about the nominations for best new artist. they are an absolute disgrace (even by grammys standards). how can they look over MGMT and Vampire Weekend both groups made brilliant debut albums. i guess fleet foxes didnt receive much prominance until later in the year but still anyone who calls themselves a music expert and cant deny the brilliance of their album. and what about Santogold!! with her incredible ability to combine every genre under the sun effortlessly. who do we get instead??!!?! duffy adele and jonas brothers (the other 2 i dont know so i'll leave them alone) adele i dont mind but she is nothing next to laura marling. i just cant believe that such a great year in music will be remembered by acts like duffy and jonas brothers.
January 30, 200917 yr I'm an awards show junkie, so I'll definately watch it, but as we don't get it live, I'll probably skip loads. I have to say, I've never loved the Grammys. I think they try too hard to please everyone and it's too long. Who will Alicia Keys be duetting with this year? She's a great singer, but does she have to be on every year? Same with John Mayer. The Grammys show is very predictable. It needs to get a bit more edgy... oh, and please, no Grammy Idol this year!
January 31, 200917 yr and i hope jack white makes an appearance. that make the night awesome alongside coldplay, radiohead, U2, paul mccartney and dave grohl.
January 31, 200917 yr Hopefully Radiohead does something edgy, unpredictable, and exciting. show up? :rolleyes:
January 31, 200917 yr This is the first time I really want to watch... what a lineup! All my favorites in one show! McCartney, U2, Grohl, CP and RH... Man, this will be the best in years. :D
January 31, 200917 yr Ugh. No. A fine display of musicians I don't care about. And the odd few I do like, I'll just watch the videos on Youtube or wherever.
January 31, 200917 yr sorry to go off topic a bit for a moment. i was just thinking earlier about the nominations for best new artist. they are an absolute disgrace (even by grammys standards). how can they look over MGMT and Vampire Weekend both groups made brilliant debut albums. i guess fleet foxes didnt receive much prominance until later in the year but still anyone who calls themselves a music expert and cant deny the brilliance of their album. and what about Santogold!! with her incredible ability to combine every genre under the sun effortlessly. who do we get instead??!!?! duffy adele and jonas brothers (the other 2 i dont know so i'll leave them alone) adele i dont mind but she is nothing next to laura marling. i just cant believe that such a great year in music will be remembered by acts like duffy and jonas brothers. The Grammys aren't actually about talent.
January 31, 200917 yr If Radiohead and Coldplay are performing, I'll watch Though Coldplay tends to suck at award show performances, I'm sure Radiohead will have something worth watching.
January 31, 200917 yr I'm going to watch, or at least record it. They seem to be trying to not suck this year. But if even with that lineup and attitude they still end up sucking completely, I doubt I'll ever purposefully watch again. What's the point? As I usually say, it's an ode to irrelevance.
February 1, 200917 yr Author One thing which is a complete joke is the new artists they nominate. I mean last year Feist was nominated for that! Feist! It was her THIRD album!
February 1, 200917 yr Me neither, although Coldplay was never nominated when I was a fan, and they didn't previously have performances of my three favorite bands of all-time.
February 1, 200917 yr i think it should be made very very clear that the actual Grammys broadcast has little to do with whose nominated and who wins. and the grammy organisers realise that which is why less than 10 awards are handed out in the 3.5hr ceremony. its meant to be a showcase of the "best" performers going around at the moment and with the likes of McCartney, Grohl, Radiohead, Coldplay, Plant, U2 and undoubtedly a surprise guest they come very very close to doing just that.
February 1, 200917 yr I'd love to watch it, but: it won't be broadcast on any national TV channel so that means I'll have to watch it on Pro7I don't understand German at allthe show starts at 2 AM on Sunday, wait, that's Monday already, isn't it?I'll have to study for an examI don't know where I'll be that night So yeah, it doesn't seem like I'll be watching it. :disappointed:
Create an account or sign in to comment