Space Cadet

Little darling, the smiles returning to the faces Little darling, it seems like years since it's been here Here comes the sun, here comes the sun and I say it's all right :sunny:

Which is why it's best to ignore it all and let it die out (or at least down...) I don't like the fighting because it usually sends the most interesting people into hiding or onto other boards. And we all suffer for their absence. (And then I get caught up in the silly fights because it's the only time some of them show up again or that something happens. :thinking: Gah. Internet. :dozey:) That said I think I've made my opinions on a couple of the instigators abundantly clear. And since one of them has gone back to old habits, consider some of my complaints about that person renewed. Again my advice being DON'T FREAKING FEED THE FREAKING TROLL, not "mob". Meh... this is boring. Goodbye :escaping:

If you can manage to ignore 2 or 3 certain people, all of the conflicts are usually invisible. Actually I've found that ignoring you-know-who completely for the last couple of weeks has lowered my blood-pressure significantly.

Yeah, David will definitely always be my Doctor, but Matt is growing on me a little more every time I see him. He's very, very good. I really liked how Patrick Troughton-y (sp?) he was in the Beast Below. (But he still really bugs me out of character for some reason.) Heh Neil Gaiman (who is currently working on the script for episode 3 of next season...*squee*) was talking about Matt's audition on his blog recently: "I loved the episode -- I'd spent some months telling people that Matt would be excellent (Admission: I'd seen his audition tapes and completely understood why he'd won the part) and that they should trust Mr Moffat..." http://journal.neilgaiman.com/2010/04/how-to-mortify-your-daughter.html They HAVE to put that audition on the DVD. I never would have guessed what he was capable of from everything else out there. I really want to see what he did that was supposedly so amazing. ...Oh dear... :lol: [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Z1BBX4slv4]YouTube- What's that behind Amy's wall?[/ame]

[random] @*Sarah*: I love your sig! :nice: [/random] And oh yeah, Moo.

dp. And Moo.

Ok, do I need to come in here and start "Moo-ing" at people again? :angry:

^Nice pic. :D

Well then it's a pity they couldn't back it up with an actual non-fabricated story. :rolleyes:

I believe you.

The Prisoner! I've been obsessed with it since I was about seven. It's the reason my brain is so warped. [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29JewlGsYxs]YouTube- I am not a number![/ame]

The thread titles have been good for a few laughs, but I'm too lazy to read any of the actual threads. :shrug: :lol:

(I wondered how long it would take for the latest bout of manufactured moral outrage to show up here. :rolleyes: Too bad the moral police aren't capable of doubling as the logic police) Please will someone find a way to end the media echo chamber that lets manufactured stories be taken as fact.

Hmm... did anyone else notice that the door on Amy's house is very Tardis-like?

He will do just fine. :D Also now have a mega girl-crush on Amy. She's awesome. Favorite line: "...strange box comes crashing out of the sky, strange man comes out of box, strange man eats fish custard. That didn't scare you at all... So you know what I'm thinking?...That must be a hell of a scary crack in your wall."

Hmm... sounds like I ought to get to work on finishing that font...

No the point is that the prunes editing the Daily Mail forgot how to have any sort of fun at all, clean or otherwise, so they don't think anyone else should either. By shaming anyone who doesn't come across as perfect, bland, and perfectly conforming they can remake the entire planet in their morose clone-like image and rule the world as supreme leaders, accepting every sigh of deep unfulfillment as holy sacrifices to their godhood. That's the point. :smug: It's a conspiracy. ...because seriously. They can't possibly be that constipated, can they?

Wait, so 5000 people are being treated as irresponsible, suicidally drunken idiots because of all of that 5000, 0.18% of them went too far. Less than 0.2%!!! Um that's statistically nothing. Any typical frosh week party usually has more like 10% maybe 20% that are nearly that bad? A lot. Sounds to me like somewhere roughly between 3000 and 4990 mature, responsible vacationers/partiers deserve a pat on the back and an apology from the Daily Mail. (Bwahaha :laugh3: Like that's ever going to happen. :rolleyes:)

Ok, I've been looking at that street on google maps trying to find that house... (which is now in 3D :wtf:) anyway, whoever zoned that place was on crack. There are so many weird little houses. It's like they built normal duplexes but then kept building other houses into the ever narrower alleys between them. :huh: It's kinda cool, but really weird. Yeah, there's just one major problem with that house. It's in Toronto. :tongue: :sneaky:

^The first 3 series of the new show were co-produced by the CBC. I heard that it was going to be shown here and was still so confused about what the show was about that I started watching just to find out. I first heard about Doctor Who when I was about 19 and had just started reading Douglas Adams. It said in his bio that he used to write for the show. I asked my Dad what Doctor Who was about and his answer was "Oh, that show. That was weird." "But what is it about?" "I don't remember, it was just really weird." And I had been confused ever since.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBHRauwOTJ4]YouTube- Vampires of Venice - Doctor Who Episode 6[/ame]

:huh:

^He really does. (Have you seen the clip with the vampires?) It should be interesting, especially with Moffat writing his dialogue. Tardis! :dance: http://www.radiotimes.com/content/features/galleries/doctor-who-exclusive-look-inside-the-new-tardis/02/

^But this is real news. It's important and must be known. How else will we shame those heathen celebrities into silence and defend true British morals? :smug:

^Ah. Try the women's section (yes, they actually still have one) ironically the most misogynistic section of the whole paper. Nothing like listing which woman celebrities have celulite (with close up photos) to prove your solid journalistic skills.