May 17, 200620 yr there's a lot of articles about this, but here's one http://www.fox21.com/Global/story.asp?S=4914714&nav=2KPp Uhm.... wow. How is supposed to "quiet down" conspiracy theorists? The footage is pretty much exaaaacctlly the same as the ones conspiracy theorists used to show that... from the footage you can't see a plane. At all. The "nose" of the plane they're talking about in the released video is wayyyyy to skinny to be of a commercial jet. Commercial jets have shorter, rounded noses. (haha, that sounds funny)...........anyways... It's either a small jet, NOT a commercial jet, or a missile. Whattevaaaa....
May 17, 200620 yr That white object is too small to be a plane, and also look at the angle of approach, pretty much along the X-axis, so unless the terrorists managed to get that low in the space between the fence and the building, I don't think it is the plane
May 17, 200620 yr I know....it's a joke isn't it....although if they DO come out and show a good quality version of a plane hitting the Pentagon and it is a commercial plane then we all need to remember that it doesn't clear the government from involvement AT ALL.....This plan to release good quality footage MIGHT actaully happen in an attempt to overshadow all the other damning points people like myself make. I waited last night for the Footage to appear on the news and I was pretty anxious actually......but when it was basically the same old footage with a few extra frames added I just couldn't believe it....... Just think how many people will hear "Pentagon show actual footage of plane hitting the building" and will believe it without even SEEING the supposed "new" footage. It's classic evil tatics.....don't let their (global elite) assumption of our stupidity apply to you......and well done to everyone who sees it for what it really is.....
May 17, 200620 yr I'm still trying to find this 'so called plane'.... what appears to be the 'nose' then the body... completely disappears before the impact!!! bollocks.
May 18, 200620 yr Yeah perhaps, but if they DO release clear cut footage (from the 84 tapes snatched on 9/11) that flight 77 DID hit the pentagon then we need to remember that this doesn't clear them of envolvement. It only goes to show that they are purposely using this footage to hide all the other smoking guns relating to that horrid day in sept 2001. Releasing more bits of bad footage which spark more conspiracy talk - then attempting to quash the whole truth movement by releasing a tape with more clear evidence of flight 77 while ignoring all the other lies they have been called on is a likely tactic. If they have the other 84 tapes then they need not have released that last joke of "video footage"..... I dunno, I might be wrong and they might not be able to show the world that flight 77 hit the Pentagon.....but if they do.....it's all been planned in an attempt to hide all the other lies. It's fucked up, either way. *un-suprised*
May 19, 200620 yr This is bollocks. It proves nothing. If anything, it furthers our argument that it wasn't a plane. If this is the best that the government can come up with, then we know that's a lie. There was more than two cameras. At some point. What about the cameras when the "plane" swept over the interstate? Did none of the gas stations catch the "plane" flying in low?
May 19, 200620 yr Author Yeah. All the videos were confiscated that captured the "plane" (whatever it was) on film. There's many cameras around the Pentagon, I'd expect, and nearby gas stations would of caught it also. The government is quite obviously hiding something, I believe.
May 19, 200620 yr You believe' date=' that changes my mind then. you believe something.[/quote'] Are these song lyrics? I don't quite understand...
May 20, 200620 yr Author Haha, sorry mrcool--I didn't mean to completely screw up your rep. O.o It did a lot more damage than I thought, so I'll up your rep back up... even though you called me a bitch and a whore. :idea2:
May 20, 200620 yr Haha' date=' sorry mrcool--I didn't mean to [i']completely[/i] screw up your rep. O.o It did a lot more damage than I thought, so I'll up your rep back up... even though you called me a bitch and a whore. :idea2: Did he really call you that??? :angry:
May 20, 200620 yr Author Haha, I guess it was somewhat reasonable. I completely ****ed his rep. :laugh3:
May 20, 200620 yr And that undefined thing should be a plane :thinking: Yes of course :dozey: Maybe I should wear my glasess and try to focus better
May 20, 200620 yr there's no plane hitting the pentagon!this image is false.i think were kamikazes or bombs into tne building...........but is it possible?
May 20, 200620 yr I'm sure if there was no quality footage on the twin towers there would be people all over claiming how it can't be an airplane how the towers where bombed, how it would be impossible for the towers to collapse, the same is with the Pentagon, but hey if it's something you want to believe in,ok whatever... The basic principles of conspiracy theories is, that the less likely it is people will be more convinced and zelaous about it...
May 20, 200620 yr you're right but in this years we've not seen ONE image that erased the doubts about the pentagon.Anyway sometimes the less likely thing is the real one....
May 20, 200620 yr Yeah and where there's doubt there are conspiracy theories, but many conspiracy theories are based on lies, misconceptions or some data that just isn't mentioned but denies the conspiracy theories, of course this data never actually reaches the conspiracy theorist, or if it does he disregards it because he would rather believe into a flash movie he saw on the web...
May 21, 200620 yr Did he really call you that??? :angry: Your avatar forces me to never watch LOTR in the same way again.
Create an account or sign in to comment