has it occured to anyone that half this thread is off topic? lol it was bound to happen but it occured so quickly.

has it occured to anyone that half this thread is off topic? lol it was bound to happen but it occured so quickly.

 

That's because certain people got unnecessarily personal and insulting (again), and one person in particular stuck his nose into something that had nothing to do with him (again).;)

has it occured to anyone that half this thread is off topic? lol it was bound to happen but it occured so quickly.

 

mc_squared makes every single topic where he posts in, off topic ;)

 

also, his abilities to start Britney Spears or Michael Jackson related threads are unquestionable, he is coldplaying.com's starter of worst threads, obviously.

 

his arguments are pretty weak, always. when he feels he's losing in a debate he's starting to attack people with "how arrogant are you", "Coldplay slagger" or "you are negative" and stuff like that.

mc_squared makes every single topic where he posts in, off topic ;)

 

also, his abilities to start threads like Britney Spears or Michael Jackson related threads are unquestionable, he is coldplaying.com's starter of worst threads, obviously.

 

his arguments are pretty weak, always. when he feels he's losing in a debate he's starting to attack people with "how arrogant are you", "Coldplay slagger" or "you are negative" and stuff like that.

 

No - everything was fine until you started getting insulting in this thread (as usual).

You just can't keep your nose out of things.;)

Insulting fellow members isn't a debate. It's just being unncecessarily provocative - and you have shown yourself to be a master at that.;)

And you wouldn't know an argument if it jumped out and hit you.;)

No - everything was fine until you started getting insulting in this thread (as usual).

You just can't keep your nose out of things.;)

Insulting fellow members isn't a debate. It's just being unncecessarily provocative - and you have shown yourself to be a master at that.;)

 

my first post in this thread (despite, the GWB related):

 

 

first time that i agree with you

 

i wasn't even talking to you hahaha

 

your reply to my post:

 

As I've said before' date=' what you say doesn't matter. [b']You're just as idiotic[/b] as he's being.;)

 

 

pwned :wacky:

my first post in this thread (despite, the GWB related):

 

 

 

 

i wasn't even talking to you hahaha

 

 

It doesn't matter who you were talking to. Once again it was in PUBLIC, and it was referring to ME. Hence my response was justified. You just won't learn.:smug:

It doesn't matter who you were talking to. Once again it was in PUBLIC' date=' and it was referring to ME. You just won't learn.:smug:[/quote']

 

hahaha you see i pwned you again ;)

hahaha you see i pwned you again ;)

 

Little things please little minds. Being obsessed with some lame "gamers" term definitely falls into that category.;)

As I've said before' date=' what you say doesn't matter. You're just as idiotic as [i']he's [/i]being.;)

 

So in Mark terms an idiot is someone who does not believe rumors? :\

 

I think the REAL idiot would be you, grow the fuck up

So in Mark terms an idiot is someone who does not believe rumors? :\

 

I think the REAL idiot would be you, grow the fuck up

 

Saddam Hussein having "weapons of mass destruction" was just a rumour (which was never proved to be fact), and countless people (very probably including you) believed it at the time. In which case, this would make you a total hypocrite.:laugh4:

Saddam Hussein having "weapons of mass destruction" was just a rumour (which was never proved to be fact)' date=' and countless people (very probably including [i']you) [/i]believed it at the time. In which case, this would make you a total hypocrite.:laugh4:

 

 

Really? we had satellite photo's and lots of physical intel pointing to he had them...was not just what ONE person said but lots of experts that had tangible evidence....nice try

 

that would make you a total moron;)

Really? we had satellite photo's and lots of physical intel pointing to he had them...was not just what ONE person said but lots of experts that had tangible evidence....nice try

 

that would make you a total moron;)

 

Nothing was ever found, and still hasn't been to this day. So guess again!!

You're just believing everything you were fed by the spin-doctors.;)

Nothing was ever found, and still hasn't been to this day. So guess again!!

You're just believing everything you were fed by the spin-doctors.;)

 

I believe in facts and evidence not hear say, unlike you. And you believed a rumor with no evidence or anything tangible, while i believed it based on tangible intel backed up by alot of hard evidence....

So one one side we have you; believing a hear-say rumor with no tangible evidence or facts

 

on my side a rumor that was backed up by TONS of tangible evidence but later turned out to be false....not even similar

I believe in facts and evidence not hear say' date=' unlike you. And you believed a rumor with no evidence or anything tangible, while i believed it based on tangible intel backed up by alot of hard evidence....[/quote']

 

Which appears to have all been fabricated as a means to an end. Admit it, you were duped like millions of others.;)

So one one side we have you; believing a hear-say rumor with no tangible evidence or facts

 

on my side a rumor that was backed up by TONS of tangible evidence but later turned out to be false....

 

Whereas my "supposed" rumour turned out to be TRUE. Go figure!;)

Whereas my "supposed" rumour turned out to be TRUE. Go figure!;)

 

This has nothing to do with truth. It has to do with believing childish hear-say rumors. Some times they will be correct, but most the time they will be wrong. this is not about the end, but how you find it out.

NIXON!

 

don't think anybody in the US should have a say unless they know the history of our presidents really well...they don't even know half the crap that other jackass presidents have done.

This has nothing to do with truth. It has to do with believing childish hear-say rumors. Some times they will be correct' date=' but most the time they will be wrong. this is not about the end, but how you find it out.[/quote']

 

EVERYTHING is rumour until proven. There STILL hasn't been any proof of any "WOMADs"!!;)

We know Iraq had weapons of mass destruction - we gave them to them!

 

Iran-Iraq war people??

 

Were we satisfied that Iraq had got rid of them? No

remember folks, Saddam several times prevented UnN inspection teams from several sites.

We know Iraq had weapons of mass destruction - we gave them to them!

 

Iran-Iraq war people??

 

Were we satisfied that Iraq had got rid of them? No

remember folks, Saddam several times prevented UnN inspection teams from several sites.

 

Still doesn't prove he had them, though.;)

well in my opinion i'm against bush for the iraq war...

 

there is the right principle behind it, but i still dont like the fact that one mans decision to go to war can cost the lives of thousands of soldiers. it plain sucks.

 

still saddam had to go. its more the preventable deaths of US soldiers that makes me dislike bush.

well in my opinion i'm against bush for the iraq war...

 

there is the right principle behind it, but i still dont like the fact that one mans decision to go to war can cost the lives of thousands of soldiers. it plain sucks.

 

still saddam had to go. its more the preventable deaths of US soldiers that makes me dislike bush.

 

I'm not saying Saddam is innocent, and even that it was wrong to depose him. I was merely making the point that nobody can EVER be sure what's true and what isn't.

You just have to go with your gut instinct, as I did in the case of "Pastor Ted".;)

Still doesn't prove he had them' date=' though.;)[/quote']

 

Its common knowledge.

Its common knowledge.

 

That isn't "proof".:rolleyes: