Matter-Eater Lad Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 Quietest Hurricane Season in 10 Years Quietest Hurricane Season in 10 Years Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 9:07 AM But the beauty of global warming is that you can blame anything on it! It's just like Bush. Warmer than usual? Global warming! Colder than usual? Global warming! That little irony caused the enviros to change the "it" term to "climate change." More hurricanes than usual? Climate change! Fewer hurricanes than usual? Climate change! Someone accused me the other day of being "anit-science" when it comes to global warming. Nah, not anti-science, but I am pro-skepticism, and climate change fanatics really push the envelope when it comes to narratives I'm willing to buy. The idea that every single change in the environment and weather patterns can be attributed to global warming and human activity despite the fact that we've only been measuring such changes reliably for a couple of generations is about as believable as the idea that Bush is to blame for every single unfortunate incident to befall the United States and its denizens over the past six years. Of course, it's the same people who believe both, which makes me even more skeptical of the climate change fanatics. If your neighborhood climate change activist is wearing a "Buck Fush" T-shirt, it makes him somewhat less credible. Anyway, no matter the cause, the good news is-- fewer hurricanes: Barring a last-second surprise from the tropics, the season will end Thursday with nine named storms, and only five of those hurricanes. This year is the first season since 1997 that only one storm nudged its way into the Gulf of Mexico... Storms were starved for fuel after ingesting masses of dry Saharan dust and air over the Atlantic Ocean. Scientists say the storm-snuffing dust was more abundant than usual this year. In the season's peak, storms were curving right like errant field goals. High pressure that normally hunkers near Bermuda shifted far eastward, and five storms rode the clockwise winds away from Florida. Finally, a rapidly growing El Nino, a warming of water over the tropical Pacific Ocean, shifted winds high in the atmosphere southward. The winds left developing storms disheveled and unable to become organized. Update: Global warming causes alarming nationwide outbreak of on-time flights over holiday weekend! A dry and relatively mild weekend made for calm airports, railyards and roadways from Boston to Atlanta to Chicago to Dallas. http://www.netscape.com/viewstory/2006/11/27/quietest-hurricane-season-in-10-years/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.townhall.com%2Fblog%23dfb1bdfa-0158-4495-87be-251c5fce5c93&frame=true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazeboflossUK Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 Yes, it's true that we are in a 10 year cycle of increased activitiy. Notice that last year, when there were many large and devastating storms, 'Global Warming' was overly presented to everyone as a huge and imminent threat to all life, using the storms as evidence that 'it's just going to get worse'. Now, this year..we hear what?...nada. Don't get me wrong....I would actually like to have more enviromental and "human friendly" fuels used as it's an obvious health benefit to everyone.....however, the current scam of Global Warming is getting irritating. We have Climate Change and they aint anything we can do about that specific eventuality. It's alot to do with he Solar Cycle of The Sun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brandon313 Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 that whole section about the global warming fanatics being the same people who dont support Bush is retarded. Why would it make their arguement less credible if they are wearing a "Buck Fush" T-shirt? so what they dont care for bush or his politics, that doesnt make them any less credible. So now if you dont support Bush your arguements on anything are automatically less credible? In my opinion the person who has their "W 2000" and "W 2004" on it are less credible, because they are the ones who voted this loser into office. and secondly obviously STILL support him after all that has happened but the rest of it is fairly decent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matter-Eater Lad Posted November 27, 2006 Author Share Posted November 27, 2006 that whole section about the global warming fanatics being the same people who dont support Bush is retarded. Why would it make their arguement less credible if they are wearing a "Buck Fush" T-shirt? so what they dont care for bush or his politics, that doesnt make them any less credible. So now if you dont support Bush your arguements on anything are automatically less credible? In my opinion the person who has their "W 2000" and "W 2004" on it are less credible, because they are the ones who voted this loser into office. and secondly obviously STILL support him after all that has happened but the rest of it is fairly decent Well they are more credible then anyone who voted for Bill twice.;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brandon313 Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 haha once again, because bill is so hated these days. You know that polls show that over 75% of the people wish he was back in office? so even after all the HORRRRRIBLE things he did like that "recession" and what not, people still prefer him over bush agh nvm im not even gonna get into this again, neither of us are going to dissuade the other, why bother? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matter-Eater Lad Posted November 27, 2006 Author Share Posted November 27, 2006 haha once again, because bill is so hated these days. You know that polls show that over 75% of the people wish he was back in office? so even after all the HORRRRRIBLE things he did like that "recession" and what not, people still prefer him over bush agh nvm im not even gonna get into this again, neither of us are going to dissuade the other, why bother? some polls yes. but americans were stupid enough to vote him in the first place. anyways americans are short term people...bill did good in the short term so they liked him...bush is doing bad in the short term, so they'd want Bill over Bush. Thats all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ondes Martenot Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 maybe we should ask China, South Korea or let's say Japan what they think about this? i believe they had a quite strong typhoon season this year... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matter-Eater Lad Posted November 27, 2006 Author Share Posted November 27, 2006 maybe we should ask China, South Korea or let's say Japan what they think about this? i believe they had a quite strong typhoon season this year... Global warming So if it was that, we would have been affected in america too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Rose Posted November 28, 2006 Share Posted November 28, 2006 And ask mr toilet that it's been a quiet year for tornadoes http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/hampshire/6190026.stm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazeboflossUK Posted November 28, 2006 Share Posted November 28, 2006 that whole section about the global warming fanatics being the same people who dont support Bush is retarded. Your right. I think Bush and his pals should be locked up in a cell for the rest of their lives for what they have done......yet I think global warming is a scam.....and there's many, many more people who have this view. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ugadawg5 Posted November 29, 2006 Share Posted November 29, 2006 Yes, it's true that we are in a 10 year cycle of increased activitiy. Notice that last year, when there were many large and devastating storms, 'Global Warming' was overly presented to everyone as a huge and imminent threat to all life, using the storms as evidence that 'it's just going to get worse'. Now, this year..we hear what?...nada. Don't get me wrong....I would actually like to have more enviromental and "human friendly" fuels used as it's an obvious health benefit to everyone.....however, the current scam of Global Warming is getting irritating. We have Climate Change and they aint anything we can do about that specific eventuality. It's alot to do with he Solar Cycle of The Sun. I'm shocked, but I totally agree. Never thought I'd see the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazeboflossUK Posted November 30, 2006 Share Posted November 30, 2006 Now this is a petition... http://www.oism.org/pproject/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mc_squared Posted November 30, 2006 Share Posted November 30, 2006 And ask mr toilet that it's been a quiet year for tornadoes http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/hampshire/6190026.stm I reckon that might have been the result of a different sort of "wind"!!:rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matter-Eater Lad Posted November 30, 2006 Author Share Posted November 30, 2006 Add something to the debates marky or leave...no one likes you're shitty jokes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mc_squared Posted November 30, 2006 Share Posted November 30, 2006 Add something to the debates marky or leave...no one likes you're shitty jokes 1. Get lost. 2. There are plenty who do. 3. You really do need to lighten up.;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matter-Eater Lad Posted November 30, 2006 Author Share Posted November 30, 2006 1. Get lost. 2. There are plenty who do. 3. You really do need to lighten up.;) Name 2 people who do and if you can i can name 90 who dont You're a moron who cant debate and who runs at the site of using any intelligence i love jokes, so i have no need to lighten up, just not shitty jokes. You never try to debate or use your mind. Its quite sad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mc_squared Posted November 30, 2006 Share Posted November 30, 2006 Name 2 people who do and if you can i can name 90 who dont You're a moron who cant debate and who runs at the site of using any intelligence i love jokes, so i have no need to lighten up, just not shitty jokes. You never try to debate or use your mind. Its quite sad I can name plenty of people who think you're bigoted, biased and won't accept any opinion that's contrary to YOURS (e.g. abortion). You don't debate - you just PREACH, which is completely wrong.;) The worst thing of all is that you appear to think you're better than everyone else. If you want to PREACH, go and write a blog (which nobody will read).;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matter-Eater Lad Posted November 30, 2006 Author Share Posted November 30, 2006 I can name plenty of people who think you're bigoted, biased and won't accept any opinion that's contrary to YOURS (e.g. abortion). You don't debate - you just PREACH, which is completely wrong.;) The worst thing of all is that you appear to think you're better than everyone else. If you want to PREACH, go and write a blog (which nobody will read).;) Funny you nor most people wont accept opinions contrary to yours....guess you're a bigot too:shocked2: I debate...you just dont wanna try to use any facts to debate. It takes too much intelligence for you to do such a simple thing. how sad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mc_squared Posted November 30, 2006 Share Posted November 30, 2006 Funny you nor most people wont accept opinions contrary to yours....guess you're a bigot too:shocked2: I debate...you just dont wanna try to use any facts to debate. It takes too much intelligence for you to do such a simple thing. how sad You don't "debate" at all. You just preach and hurl insults, plus your "facts" are actually propaganda. Unfortunately your head is stuck too far up your backside for you to realise it.;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matter-Eater Lad Posted November 30, 2006 Author Share Posted November 30, 2006 You don't "debate" at all. You just preach and hurl insults' date=' plus your "facts" are actually propaganda. Unfortunately your head is stuck too far up your backside for you to realise it.;)[/quote'] And you're so ignorant you dont realize thats what everyone does in a debate.:laugh3: Atleast i have facts to debate with, when it comes time you turn your brain off and just throw insults and when science if presented like a true fool you just ignore it. truly pathetic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now