If you all continue to fight:

 

This guy will take you:

 

 

And so will this guy:

 

 

And this guy, yeh him! he will as well - although he might miss you by the looks of it:

 

 

 

 

And well, umm, you could probably take this 'guy':

 

 

lmfao.... this fight is STILL going on!? what round are we on?

lmfao.... this fight is STILL going on!? what round are we on?

 

42

 

I'm considering turning the TV off.

dayum :stunned:

so i guess it isnt "over"

It was till you bumped the thread. :P

^ :lol:

Hahahaha @ Johnny

 

What a deluded little boy.

Hahahaha @ Johnny

 

What a deluded little boy.

 

 

 

will you please stop goading him.

 

I can see no point in this post other than in fuelling the flames.

jen, if you don't want this to continue, why don't you just lock the thread?

Well to be honest, he seems to have missed the point entirely on almost every post and seems to think he is this beacon of peace an hope amongst a forum full of arguing idiots, when in fact he's one of the worst ones.

 

I felt that post was necessary to outline this

 

As has been said many times, he doesn't have to reply to me if he doesn't want to

jen, if you don't want this to continue, why don't you just lock the thread?

 

its getting to that point

Well to be honest, he seems to have missed the point entirely on almost every post and seems to think he is this beacon of peace an hope amongst a forum full of arguing idiots, when in fact he's one of the worst ones.

 

I felt that post was necessary to outline this

 

As has been said many times, he doesn't have to reply to me if he doesn't want to

 

so calling him a deluded little boy will enlighten him? I don't think so.

its getting to that point

 

we'd prefer not to lock threads, as a general rule its counter-productive. if you lock a thread the argument starts up elsewhere.

 

At this stage I'd rather everyone stopped arguing

we'd prefer not to lock threads, as a general rule its counter-productive. if you lock a thread the argument starts up elsewhere.

 

At this stage I'd rather everyone stopped arguing

 

that's what i was thinking. :confused:

we'd prefer not to lock threads, as a general rule its counter-productive. if you lock a thread the argument starts up elsewhere.

 

At this stage I'd rather everyone stopped arguing

Perhaps wise.

The problem is you, I don't see anyone else crying about the good old days of the summer.

 

I miss the good old days of summer!! that was so fun tbh. namely cos i didn't have any school. ah and i could drink when there wasn't anyone home. :sneaky: fun times.... :wacko:

Well to be honest, he seems to have missed the point entirely on almost every post and seems to think he is this beacon of peace an hope amongst a forum full of arguing idiots, when in fact he's one of the worst ones.

 

I felt that post was necessary to outline this

 

As has been said many times, he doesn't have to reply to me if he doesn't want to

 

I did tell him to ignore you on several occasions, but for some reason he decided not to heed my advice.

Whether the powers-that-be then decide you need to tone down your behaviour is another matter entirely, and actually has nothing to do with how he feels about it personally.

If you all continue to fight:[/font][/size][/color]

 

This guy will take you:

 

 

And so will this guy:

 

 

And this guy, yeh him! he will as well - although he might miss you by the looks of it:

 

 

 

 

And well, umm, you could probably take this 'guy':

 

 

[/center]

 

:lol:

 

I don't even know what's going on, and I'm GLAD I don't. Stop fighting, guys. It's just getting pathetic and ridiculous, and this is NOT THE PLACE.

To be honest, it's just because Mark and Nathan won't let this go. And people get involved.

 

Nathan makes blunt comments about things. I think most of them are hilarious, but he'll tell you himself, I've had a go at him before for putting them in threads where it's probably so unnecessary that it annoys people. The way I see it, Nathan shouldn't make comments in threads that involve personal problems/tragedies. But in any other random thread, I enjoy what he says. He makes comments that are so blunt, but everyone else is thinking them anyways. That's why I enjoy it. They're funny.

 

Mark makes his jokes. I personally don't find them very funny, but I can understand when other people enjoy them. They are awful though. That's my personal opinion and I'm not the only person to think that, but whatever. I don't read most of them. I go out of my way to just scroll past most of Mark's posts. Other people like them, I don't, meh. I don't think generally in general threads, I point that opinion out. I think Mark can say himself that I don't randomly point at his jokes like "THAT'S A SHIT JOKE, MARK!!!"

 

The thing here is that Mark can't seem to ignore Nathan's posts, and Nathan can't seem to ignore Marks. That's what started the whole thing between them. Mark was quick to point out where he thought Nathan's posts were bad, and Nathan was just as quick to point out when he thought Mark's posts were horribly unfunny.

 

 

My problem with Mark is that he's saying Nathan does things, and trying to portray Nathan as the bad guy, when Mark's doing everything he's complaining about. In all honest, you could look through the posts in random threads and this thread, this week, and you'd find Mark has mentioned this situation and taken a sly dig at Nathan way more than Nathan has to Mark.

 

I don't like this stuff about how I'm supposedly just standing up for my friend. It makes no difference whether I'm Nathan's friend or not. The same for Lore and Ren. Ren's barely spoken to Nathan at all before this. And the only contact he's had with Lore is to be told off for unappropriate comments. I just happen to agree with Nathan's notion that Mark tells jokes and they have no point to me. And I disagree with Mark's behaviour here.

 

He's been claiming that Nathan's been getting people to gang up on him, when it's not true at all. Nathan never once asked me to agree with him. Never went reporting him to mods or admins (did Mark do this? I know he's mentioned that he was going to...) He claimed that Nathan's part of a group, when he keeps mentioning his award and how many "fans" he has. He's said that Nathan keeps bringing it up again, when I've been in numerous threads where Mark's said "wait for a certain troublemaker to come and ruin your thread! ;)" even though neither Nathan, myself, anyone else has even been in the thread. It's just goading, is he surprised threads like that get ruined? When it's him bringing that tone in to it? But he proceeds to act like it's all Nathan's fault when it happens.

 

 

Aside from Mark's contradictions, his friends are just as bad. Simon just wants to apologise for everything, and expects everyone to do the same. When Nathan doesn't feel he's done anything wrong, he's not going to apologise. That's the problem you're bringing on yourself, Simon. By apologising just to get it over with, you're showing yourself as a weak person who'll say he's done something wrong even when he doesn't believe he has. You'd gather a lot more respect for yourself by not giving up like that.

 

Johnny... I'm not sure what to think about you. It's unfortunate to see that you're one minute claiming everyone should stop fighting and that Nathan's wrong for insulting you, before you do it again. Then when your reasoning for that is "if everyone else is doing it, why should I just sit there and be an angel?!" it's just like... you're destroying your point. If you're going to claim to be the peacemaker and bigger man, at least stick to it. You're really not doing yourself any favours and it gives your percepted level of maturity a big hit, too.

 

 

Anyways that's just my opinion. And I don't think I've been abusive in any way in this post. Mark said to me a few days ago that I'm no saint, but aside from Mark, Johnny and Simon, how many people have had any problems with the way I talk to people on this site?

very well said.

very well said.

 

.

I did tell him to ignore you on several occasions, but for some reason he decided not to heed my advice.

Whether the powers-that-be then decide you need to tone down your behaviour is another matter entirely, and actually has nothing to do with how he feels about it personally.

 

 

this power-that-be thinks you're all as bad as each other. not one of you will stop, and you all keep posting to say why the others are at fault, or to post another veiled remark. I've read both of these argument threads in the cold light of day, after the event as an uninvolved bystander, and they don't portray any of the participants in a flattering way.

 

you all need to take a step back and act more maturely. the he-said/she-said thing doesn't fit with anyone's other postings.

 

 

 

The thing here is that Mark can't seem to ignore Nathan's posts, and Nathan can't seem to ignore Marks.

 

which is strange seeing as though there is a tool built into the forum for doing exactly that.

if people would use it, and not keep turning it off for a peek at what's being said, there would be no problem.

 

I don't expect everyone to get along, and I don't expect that everyone will kiss and make-up after this argument. What I would expect is a gentleman's agreement to put this behind us, and agree to co-exist for the sake of the whole community. Its currently very divisive, and there is no need for it to be that way.

Yeah but I've only ever used the Ignore feature once. MAFE I think it was. And it wasn't cause we'd had an arguement, it was just cause she wrote things in a way my eyes couldn't stand reading.

 

The problem is curiosity. If they both put eachother on ignore, they'd end up checking every post just on the off chance they'd spoke about eachother.

Yeah but I've only ever used the Ignore feature once. MAFE I think it was. And it wasn't cause we'd had an arguement, it was just cause she wrote things in a way my eyes couldn't stand reading.

 

The problem is curiosity. If they both put eachother on ignore, they'd end up checking every post just on the off chance they'd spoke about eachother.

 

I know. They'll have to work on their willpower. :) Its hard but it is possible.

 

I would love to be able to use the ignore feature some days, but it would defeat the object of my job description. :laugh3:

.

 

But please note Jen said everyone, and that includes you and Ren.;)