Lookit how positive he's being. :cheesy: He complimented something and everything.

 

I would post more but it would be a pain in the ass anyway.

 

And it would be totally irrelevant, as I was clearly referring to his attitude towards me, not in general.;)

I used to be fair and reasonable, it was to no avail

 

YOU MADE ME THIS WAY

 

.

If anyone's being fair and reasonable, I'm more than happy to discuss anything with them at any time.;)

That's not really true. I was rational and fair last time when i asked you a question which you avoided to answer even thought i didn't even insult you just because we had differences in the past and then you ignored every single point i made by calling me biased and say it was all irrelevant.

 

I'm sorry, i just had to point that out. You may continue.

if you hate Mark so much, and think he causes too much trouble, then why don't you ban him Ren? :thinking:

if you hate Mark so much, and think he causes too much trouble, then why don't you ban him Ren? :thinking:

 

Retarded logic is retarded

That's not really true. I was rational and fair last time when i asked you a question which you avoided to answer even thought i didn't even insult you just because we had differences in the past and then you ignored every single point i made by calling me biased and say it was all irrelevant.

 

As I said at the time, I had every reason to believe (on past evidence) that you were being facetious (whether you were or not), and therefore I saw no reason to debate with you in public, and still don't.

I also said that if you were serious about addressing any issues you might have in a fair and reasonable manner, you would PM me, which you still haven't done.

Should you wish to do so, then please feel free.;)

Retarded logic is retarded

 

true,

if you hate Mark so much, and think he causes too much trouble, then why don't you ban him Ren? :thinking:

 

He can't ban people whose accounts are older then 30 days(?), plus that would be retarded. He would lose his mod status, and Mark would just come back since he obviously has no life/job/girlfriend/friends/etc.

He can't ban people whose accounts are older then 30 days(?), plus that would be retarded. He would lose his mod status, and Mark would just come back since he obviously has no life/job/girlfriend/friends/etc.

 

Coming from you, that's hilarious!:laugh3:

He can't ban people whose accounts are older then 30 days(?), plus that would be retarded. He would lose his mod status, and Mark would just come back since he obviously has no life/job/girlfriend/friends/etc.

 

yeah... I thought it over and now I agree

Coming from you, that's hilarious!:laugh3:

 

She's a teenage girl, you are a man.

if you hate Mark so much, and think he causes too much trouble, then why don't you ban him Ren? :thinking:

Banning is not the answer. I merely pointed out something that i experienced when i tried to have a decent debate with him some time ago. I think more people would actually like him here if he changed his attitude but that's just my opinion.

 

Now that i read some pages i also have to say that i have nothing against Aleja but i remember that whenever someone had an argument with Mark she'd come out from no where just to say "OMG, LEAVE MARKY MARK ALONE! I DON'T CARE WHAT YOU SAY BUT I'M SURE HE'S THE VICTIM HERE". I don't know If she did that only because Mark contacted her or told her to post that but if she did that without knowing the facts ,then that was a very silly and childish thing to do.

 

Ok, i think i said enough and you can continue debating if you want but be nice kids.

Mark's either a 140 year old man, or a 2 or 3 year old

Banning is not the answer. I merely pointed out something that i experienced when i tried to have a decent debate with him some time ago. I think more people would actually like him here if he changed his attitude but that's just my opinion.

 

Now that i read some pages i also have to say that i have nothing against Aleja but i remember that whenever someone had an argument with Mark she'd come out from no where just to say "OMG, LEAVE MARKY MARK ALONE! I DON'T CARE WHAT YOU SAY BUT I'M SURE HE'S THE VICTIM HERE". I don't know If she did that only because Mark contacted her or told her to post that but if she did that without knowing the facts ,then that was a very silly and childish thing to do.

 

Ok, i think i said enough and you can continue debating if you want but be nice kids.

 

100% agreed

She's a teenage girl, you are a man.

 

Has nothing to do with it, as everyone has an equal right to be on here whatever their age, nationality, religious persuasion, sexual orientation, marital status or line of work.

;)

Coming from you, that's hilarious!:laugh3:

 

You're like 50 years old and you argue with people half your age on a Coldplay forum, yeah that's so like me! :dance:

 

But being serious for a sec, don't you have anything better to do? It's pretty sad for someone your age to be acting as silly as you are right now.

Has nothing to do with it, as everyone has an equal right to be on here whatever their age, nationality, religious persuasion, sexual orientation, marital status or line of work.

;)

 

Way to miss my point, OLD MAN

There are MANY things better to do than trying to do what Mark is doing right now

Banning is not the answer. I merely pointed out something that i experienced when i tried to have a decent debate with him some time ago. I think more people would actually like him here if he changed his attitude but that's just my opinion.

 

And as I said, I responded to that at the time, and I've just responded to it again. The offer's still there.;)

 

Now that i read some pages i also have to say that i have nothing against Aleja but i remember that whenever someone had an argument with Mark she'd come out from no where just to say "OMG, LEAVE MARKY MARK ALONE! I DON'T CARE WHAT YOU SAY BUT I'M SURE HE'S THE VICTIM HERE". I don't know If she did that only because Mark contacted her or told her to post that but if she did that without knowing the facts ,then that was a very silly and childish thing to do.

 

 

And I would say exactly the same thing about certain people who always come out of the woodwork for mobbing/bashing activities, so it works both ways.:smug:

As I said at the time, I had every reason to believe (on past evidence) that you were being facetious (whether you were or not), and therefore I saw no reason to debate with you in public, and still don't.

I also said that if you were serious about addressing any issues you might have in a fair and reasonable manner, you would PM me, which you still haven't done.

Should you wish to do so, then please feel free.;)

I really wasn't , i was only curious and i also said i was going to debate and not insult you and i'm still keeping my word. That thread was public so i don't know why i should ask you in private when you answered others in public too( sara for example). Like i said, it's not really my intention to be best buddies with you, i just wanted to understand your logic and see if this is really how you are or it's just one elaborated online persona. I still keep what i said that time, i don't hold any grudge on you but i dislike your attitude sometimes and i hope you consider having a rational debate in the near future without labelling me as biased or irrelevant. I have nothing more to say here cos it's none of my business but i just wanted to point that sometimes you avoid answering certain individuals like myself just because you don't like them no matter how nice or rational their questions may be.

There are MANY things better to do than trying to do what Mark is doing right now

 

And YOU'RE not doing the same? Actually what I've seen coming from you is a pathetic attempt to prove a point that doesn't exist, with posts that might as well say nothing.

Regardless of who it is. It makes no sense to say "there are better things to do than argue with Mark" when it seems like you couldn't go 5 minutes without doing so.

And YOU'RE not doing the same? Actually what I've seen coming from you is a pathetic attempt to prove a point that doesn't exist, with posts that might as well say nothing.

Regardless of who it is. It makes no sense to say "there are better things to do than argue with Mark" when it seems like you couldn't go 5 minutes without doing so.

 

I didn't mean that,

 

I meant there are MANY things better to do than doing what Mark is doing right now

 

not "there are better things to do than argue with Mark"

I didn't mean that,

 

I meant there are MANY things better to do than doing what Mark is doing right now

 

not "there are better things to do than argue with Mark"

 

The second part wasn't exactly aimed at you.

Oh dear,just the same old here...:lol:

The second part wasn't exactly aimed at you.

 

ah I see