Nathan seems to have toned down with Mark, and Mark keeps on attacking him.

Nathan seems to have toned down with Mark, and Mark keeps on attacking him.

 

Mark seriously has a problem. I tried to call a truce and be civil with him and he is incapable of being nice.

I have to admit. You crack me up when you argue with him. Pretty classic:laugh3:

Mark it almost seems like you try to bait Nathan to be rude to you.

 

You could easily argue it's the other way round. I've always said that if he puts a sock in it once and for all, I'll be happy to call it quits. However, I know that won't happen.;)

Mark seriously has a problem. I tried to call a truce and be civil with him and he is incapable of being nice.

 

Actually, it's the other way round, especially as you keep getting involved in things that have nothing whatsoever to do with you.;)

You could easily argue it's the other way round. I've always said that if he puts a sock in it once and for all, I'll be happy to call it quits. However, I know that won't happen.;)

 

I haven't seen him attacking you lately. Seems like you are going after him more.

I haven't seen him attacking you lately. Seems like you are going after him more.

 

Check the "Funniest Poster" thread and you will see that isn't the case. He's at it all the time.;)

And with all due respect, you're actually not around that much.

Hey Mark ":rolleyes:"

Check the "Funniest Poster" thread and you will see that isn't the case. He's at it all the time.;)

And with all due respect, you're actually not around that much.

 

Mark, the beginning of it was pretty crazy. However, even though I am not around that much, Nathan seems to be toning it down yet you call him out when he is not even conversing with you.

Mark, the beginning of it was pretty crazy. However, even though I am not around that much, Nathan seems to be toning it down yet you call him out when he is not even conversing with you.

 

Well he definitely isn't "toning it down", that's for sure. However, I'm prepared to see what happens, even though I have stated this on numerous occasions in the past and nothing's changed.

As long as you come back and point it out the next time he (or one of the others) transgresses (and believe me, it won't take long), it's fine by me.;)

Well he definitely isn't "toning it down", that's for sure. However, I'm prepared to see what happens, even though I have stated this on numerous occasions in the past and nothing's changed.

As long as you come back and point it out the next time he (or one of the others) transgresses (and believe me, it won't take long), it's fine by me.;)

 

We'll see what happens. Aside from Nathan being rude to you and others I really do find his blunt honesty refreshing.

We'll see what happens. Aside from Nathan being rude to you and others I really do find his blunt honesty refreshing.

 

As long as it doesn't descend into personal insults/attacks, then I don't have a problem with it.;)

fair enough.

fair enough.

 

Fine. Now you're around again, perhaps we'll finally make some progress.

I've always said you can disagree with people's opinions without being personally insulting.

That's what many on here seem to forget.;)

I'll try and be on here as much as I can. working a bunch really fucks up my ability to be here consistently.

I'll try and be on here as much as I can. working a bunch really fucks up my ability to be here consistently.

 

As I said, that's a great pity. I'm pretty confident things would have been much better if you'd been around over recent months.;)

As I said, that's a great pity. I'm pretty confident things would have been much better if you'd been around over recent months.;)

 

I missed this place man.

The thing is Mark, I don't attack you in conversations that have nothing to do with you, I respond directly to your posts.

 

Whereas you are attacking me when (often especially) when I am not there.

The thing is Mark, I don't attack you in conversations that have nothing to do with you, I respond directly to your posts.

 

But your comments are still predominantly personally insulting (either explicitly or implicitly, which is totally uncalled for, especially when it's in response to an opinion.

 

Whereas you are attacking me when (often especially) when I am not there.

 

As I said, if your behaviour remains unchanged, it's fair game IMO. Otherwise, I would probably only comment if I felt you were being vindictively rude or insulting.

 

So in other words, you can't have it both ways. The choice is yours, as it always has been.

I'm easy.;)

Aaron is right. Nobody (except for Ian and Jen) has a right to dictate to somebody about how they post, but that includes you.;)

Oh, and if you are really intent on doing something to change it, you could change your sig and refrain from posting facetious remarks in threads which are clearly to do with me.

That's where this latest round all started.

Aaron (who even agrees himself the "c" word is totally unnecessary) will then see what happens, so there won't be any doubt from this point onwards, and his opinion is actually one I respect, which makes a big difference.

So let's see if this makes a difference.;)

Hahahahahaha

 

Can you do a post that isn't full of hypocrisy and delusion?

 

Also nice grammatical errors there ;)

Hahahahahaha

 

Can you do a post that isn't full of hypocrisy and delusion?

 

Also nice grammatical errors there ;)

 

Aaron will see after my comment that this was completely unnecessary and inciteful, so if you continue like this, you will only help to prove my point.;)

You know mark you wouldn't look like such a douche if you didn't use the winking smiley everytime you try to prove something.;)

You know mark you wouldn't look like such a douche if you didn't use the winking smiley everytime you try to prove something.;)

 

This has nothing to do with you, and further serves to prove my point.;)

Aaron will see after my comment that this was completely unnecessary and inciteful, so if you continue like this, you will only help to prove my point.;)

 

I don't really care what I prove to anyone, I just think you are one of the most ridiculous human beings I've ever "met" and you continue to be as ridiculous as you always are, that post doesn't even deserve a reasoned response because of how ridiculous it is and even if I did you'd just ignore the points I made or misunderstand the points I made (since you are doing that a lot lately)

 

That is no more "inciteful" (which I am pretty sure is not a real word btw) than anything you've posted towards me, you attack me for my typos and call that "grammar" so when you make grammar mistakes I take some small pleasure in pointing out that you make them. Especially in the case of the ellipsis (which is what I was mocking you for in the other thread that you never worked out) and now you are making up words apparently.

Aaron will see after my comment that this was completely unnecessary and inciteful, so if you continue like this, you will only help to prove my point.;)

 

Mark, man, I understand your issue with the C word. True, I do not like the word. You still seem to be antogonizing Nathan. I understand also that you think he is doing the same thing to you. Why not just let it go. I am all about peace and love. I am the eternal pacifist. If someone pisses me off, I usually walk away. Why not just let it go.