would you pay for a cping subscription?

[*MX*ColdplayObsess3d]

I wouldn't pay, then I would see this site in a light of "All they want's my money now. What a shame."

[busybeeburns]

Ian I said it was just hypothetical, I was just wondering if people would pay for posting here :P

I was talking about this quote below, not yours :P

 

I have been hearing some rumors about the forum closing because of the lack of sponsorship.

hence: I don't know where that story came from, there is an abundance of sponsorship to keep the site running :)

[mc_squared]

I was talking about this quote below, not yours :P

 

That's why quotes from old threads shouldn't be dug up and re-used, as it just confuses everyone. At the time that particular thread was created, there was a lot of uncertainty and rumour flying around.;)

[Prince Myshkin]

That's why quotes from old threads shouldn't be dug up and re-used, as it just confuses everyone.;)

 

Not always. Sometimes they are useful in seeing how people have or haven't changed.

[mc_squared]

Mostly they are just a form of unnecessary sh*t-stirring.

[Prince Myshkin]

Mostly they are just a form of unnecessary sh*t-stirring.

 

It's hardly a board meltdown, and this thread is quite an interesting concept.

[*MX*ColdplayObsess3d]

Heh "concept" :awesome:

[mc_squared]

It's hardly a board meltdown, and this thread is quite an interesting concept.

 

The thread topic in itself is fine.

[Megalomania]

Not always. Sometimes they are useful in seeing how people have or haven't changed.

 

Oh shnap. :lol: :thumbsup:

 

 

 

Is Mark going to convert this thread into another one of his "CERTAIN members shouldn't be on here and obviously cause all this shit :rolleyes: ;)" threads? :sick:

[fietssleutel]

Subscription kills forums. I've seen it happen before and it's not pretty. :(

 

I don't know where that story came from, there is an abundance of sponsorship to keep the site running, even during the quiet times. This situation has never been anything to the contrary :)

Good. :nice:

[xxKels]

:rolleyes: time for the old shriveled fucks to go to bed.

 

BUT- I would pay a nominal fee here IFFFFFF..... Ian added a built in instant chat box.

Just mho, fanks, bye.

[Reilly]

That's why quotes from old threads shouldn't be dug up and re-used, as it just confuses everyone.

 

Let me get this straight, because there was a little bit of confusion between Ian and Lore, we should just forget about every old thread?

[Lore]

Not always. Sometimes they are useful in seeing how people have or haven't changed.

 

this.

 

And no one was quoting an old thread, I just posted a link. Since when is that a big crime?

 

And both Ian's post and the first post of the thread are very clear, this won't happen it's just hypothetical

 

some people is just seeking attention as always

[Reilly]

some people is just seeking attention as always

 

Hahaha! I hope you're kidding Lore, that's like the mantra for users who are generally assholes on here. If they ever disagree with someone, then that person is attention seeking and a troll, forget their actual opinion, that's all they are, dismissed, irrelevant and biased. ;)

[Lore]

no in this case, as always mark didn't say anything related to the topic and came to tell us how things should be done according to him, of course he's trying to seek attention.

 

Luckily he's not an admin because in that case we'd have a 600 page book about stupid forum rules.

[a_face_of_light]

you forgot to mention nearly everyone would be banned too:P.

[Reilly]

I can see what you mean, especially as he wanted to enforce this rule based on very vague information.

 

If you don't like people digging up old threads, you have something to hide.

[hotdensestate]

no, to be honest I would be better off without procrastinating here anyway :P

[Megalomania]

no, to be honest I would be better off without procrastinating here anyway :P

 

Very true. :disappointed:

 

I waste so much of my time on here. . . .:P

[eff-exx]

No