GazeboflossUK

A lot of the third world is overpopulated with diseased people and the reason this problem has just been getting worse over our life time is because they have such terrible lives/living conditions. Lack of food, homes, jobs and most of all education must be the main causes behind such diseased populations' continuous growth (and many deaths too of course). If they had lives, jobs and an education then a more safe & modest approach to reproduction would evolve. Children growing up with disease from birth is because of no education and well, boredom. (plus, rape of course). The "money" in the western world (as well as the dictators in money wealth divided countries) have had above and beyond the means to truly help this over the decades of our lives yet they continue to spend wasteful trillions & trillions on the setting up of new military empires around the globe. Then WE the people, who overwhelmingly oppose such wars, surveillance control grids and 'empire building' from our so-called leaders, are asked to give the odd donation here and there to help but in reality, while being a commendable act, is doing so very little to ease the situations in the parts of the world where millions are left to scrape through their lives poor, sick and uneducated about the world - left on the scrapheap. There is plenty of space to go around, it's a myth that there's too many people. The problem is large populations have been herded in large and expanding cities. There are large parts of the earth that have very little population (large sections of Russia and the US too) that over time could have been developed into completely habitable dwellings. While I'm not a buyer of the "Man Made" global warming stock - I do want to see a more sensible effort to curb dumping of waste. I want to see more recycling where it's a "no-brainer" to do so. No point in completely messing up our environment. And I do agree the mass deforestation needs to stop and vast areas of the green belt need to be protected & replenished to help everyones lives. So - You've got to wonder - why are the monies, the wealth, the resources of our planet - Earth - spread out so unfairly and this issue (despite what they say) never genuinely addressed? It's because it's a part, a section of a wider scheme, a vision which the few true modern elite pieces of trash have devised & documented over decades & decades. We all know that the people "in charge" of us aren't fair, good and honest people. You know it, I know it - it's in your bones not to trust them. All givernments governments go bad eventually - FACT. Most of the world are sick of their governments yet sadly most have been conditioned to accept it - while dissenters are increasingly being ridiculed, infiltrated, set up, watched, listened to and jailed - all under the guise of a 'global war on terrorism'. See/Watch ENDGAME -Blueprint For Global Enslavement.

I'm not a believer in man made global warming at all. All the planets in our solar system are heating up - I suppose we are to blame for that!?!? And couples who were sterilised would be eligible for carbon credits under the controversial proposal. The report, written by Perth specialist Professor Barry Walters, also suggests that the government should introduce a "baby levy" in the form of a carbon tax in line with the "polluter pays" principle. The proposals smack of Communist China's one child policy and present a nightmare scenario of authoritarian governmental control. Under such legislation the government would essentially have the power to force people to stop re-producing. You may think such views are extreme and representative of a small minority, and you'd be right. The problem however is that this minority are the ones in power. Similar views have been espoused by UN agencies such as the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), WHO and UNICEF and international NGO's such as the International Planned Parenthood Federation, as well as The US Government for decades. Calls to begin sterilizing the human population have previously been put forward by former secretary of State and high ranking Bilderberger Henry Kissinger in a declassified document of the National Security Council (1974) entitled "The Implications of World-wide Population Growth on the Security and External Interests of the United States". This document lists, as a priority, birth-rate control in 13 key countries in the Third World, especially in South America. Extraordinary resources were allotted to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to implement the policy of birth-rate control. The memorandum basically stresses the need to offer increased aid for third world countries that agree to implement programs of sterilization and depopulation. It also contains sections entitled: Creating Conditions Conducive to Fertility Decline, which calls for, amongst other things, "reducing infant and child mortality" Concentration on Education and Indoctrination of The Rising Generation of Children Regarding the Desirability of Smaller Family Size Utilization of Mass Media and Satellite Communications Systems for Family Planning The memorandum also includes a section that lauds abortion and states that " -- It would be unwise to restrict abortion research for the following reasons: 1) The persistent and ubiquitous nature of abortion. 2) Widespread lack of safe abortion techniques..." The document contains many more hideous passages, read it for yourself by clicking here. Such calls to depopulate are echoed within the western scientific community by prominent figures such as Dr. Eric R. Pianka, who travels around the US speaking of the need to exterminate 90% of the population in order to save the planet. He suggests using the airborne ebola virus to do the job, choosing it over AIDS because of its faster kill period. Ebola victims suffer the most tortuous deaths imaginable as the virus kills by liquefying the internal organs. The body literally dissolves as the victim writhes in pain bleeding from every orifice. Pianka is always keen to stress that his views are not race specific and that he wants to see 90% of all races exterminated. He is quoted as saying "We need to sterilize everybody on the earth and make the antidote freely available to anyone willing to work for it". Pianka was presented with a distinguished scientist award by the Texas Academy of Science in 2006. Pianka is no crackpot. He has given lectures to prestigious universities worldwide. His chilling comments, and their often enthusiastic reception, again underscore the elite's agenda to enact horrifying measures of population control. Dr Pianka's comments are merely echoes of the elite lust for a Malthusian social Darwinist control mechanism. They wish to use the excuse of having to "save the earth" in order to take away freedom and implement a massive authoritarian control grid. These views have also been famously perpetuated by control freaks such as Ted Turner, Jacques-Yves Cousteau and Prince Philip. "The simplest answer is that the world's population should be about two billion, and we've got about six billion now," Turner told E Magazine, an environmentalist publication. Turner went even further in an interview with Audubon magazine, stating that "A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal." That works out to 127,750,000 people per year, and 1.27 billion people over 10 years. In the foreword to his 1986 book If I Were an Animal, Prince Philip wrote, "In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation." The elite are very concerned about their noble effort to cull the population for the "greater good". Throughout history elites have invented justification for barbaric practices as a cover for their true agenda of absolute power and control over populations. Up until the 19th century, the transatlantic slave trade was justified by saying that the practice was biblical and therefore morally redeemable in nature, despite the fact that no such bible passage exists. Today the control mechanism is the continued perpetuation of the myth that humanity is killing the planet. Elite organisations such as the Bilderberg Group, CFR, Trilateral Commission, and their think tanks like the Club of Rome are engaged in selling this myth to the masses. In a report titled The First Global Revolution (1991) published by the Club of Rome, a globalist think tank whose members have included Kissinger, David Rockefeller and Al Gore, we find the following statement: "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.... All these dangers are caused by human intervention... The real enemy, then, is humanity itself." In the past, the Club of Rome has resorted to deceptive tactics in order to support their plans. In 1972, the Club of Rome, along with an MIT team released a report called Limits to growth. The report stated that we were to reach an environmental holocaust by the year 2000 due to overpopulation and other environmental problems. Support for their conclusions was gathered by results from a computer model. Aurelio Peccei, one of the founders of the Club of Rome, later confessed that the computer program had been written to give the desired results. Why is this so concerning? Because groups such as the Club of Rome are contracted out by our own governments and the UN to prepare ‘Policy Guidance Documents’ which they use in formulating their policies and programs. How come the Club of Rome gets the gig? Simply because many high ranking UN and government officials are also CoR members, or have direct corporate ties to members. The same goes for the CFR and the Trilateral Commission. A recently unearthed documentary that sought to expose this agenda at its inception is George Hunt's excellent research piece on the environmental movement. The doomsday warning of the population bomb consistently referred to as justification for depopulation is also complete pseudo-science. Populations in developed countries are declining and only in third world countries is it expanding dramatically. Industrialization itself levels out population trends and even despite this world population models routinely show that the earth's population will level out at 9 billion in 2050 and slowly decline after that. "The population of the most developed countries will remain virtually unchanged at 1.2 billion until 2050," states a United Nations report. The UN population policies seem to be in direct contradiction to THEIR OWN FINDINGS. Conservation International's own study revealed that 46% of the earth's surface was an untouched wilderness, that is land areas not including sea. It is commonly accepted that the entire world population could all fit into the state of Texas and each have an acre of their own land. Once a country industrializes there is an average of a 1.6 child rate per household, so the western world population is actually in decline. That trend has also been witnessed in areas of Asia like Japan and South Korea. The UN has stated that the population will peak at 9 billion and then begin declining. Even if you buy into the propaganda that climate change is caused by man in the face of the facts, and then buy into the propaganda that there are too many people on the planet in the face of the facts, can you justify advocating state micro management of your life down to how many children you are allowed to have? Furthermore, can you justify programs of sterilization? We are being bombarded daily with idiotic notions that the human race and life itself is a virus that has spread all over the planet and that we must consider stemming our own progression to counter it. Meanwhile, as we ludicrously debate culling ourselves, real environmental problems are doing the job for us. Genetically modified garbage is poisoning our very food supply, chemical pollutants are flowing into our water supplies, the disappearance of huge swathes of the bee populations across the world is threatening crop production, deforestation, toxic waste dumping, the list goes on. All these real important issues are being buried in a sea a frothing bullshit. Every time the issue of climate change is raised the we are told that the solution is more taxes and more extreme control over our lives. These things will not reverse the effects of climate change, which has been proven to be a thoroughly natural cycle of our planet since the dawn of time. Instead they will do everything to grease the skids for draconian taxation and control measures that will aid the construction of the prison planet that the elite have planned all along. source

FLASHBACK: Ron Paul House Floor Speech on Iraq (October 8, 2002) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8TZ5cpaPlf4 (C-SPAN) Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) made comments on Iraq during a House floor speech on October 8, 2002. Voted against the 2002 Iraq resolution. Said there is "no convincing evidence that Iraq is capable of threatening the security of this country." Stands against the preemptive strike. In the Christian doctrine of Just War, the proper authority must be responsible for initiating the war, that proper authority cannot be transferred to the President nor to the United Nations. Going to war through the back door (the UN). There's no act of agression. Iraq, an impoverish, 3rd world nation. Congress must assume responsibility for the declaration of war.

De-Facto One Child Policy Urged in Australia Tamara McLean AAP Monday December 10, 2007 COUPLES who have more than two children should be charged a lifelong tax to offset their extra offspring's carbon dioxide emissions, a medical expert says. The report in an Australian medical journal called for parents to be charged $5000 a head for every child after their second, and an annual tax of up to $800. And couples who were sterilised would be eligible for carbon credits under the controversial proposal. Perth specialist Professor Barry Walters was heavily critical of the $4000 baby bonus, saying that paying new parents extra for every baby fuelled more children, more emissions and "greenhouse-unfriendly behaviour". Instead, it should be replaced with a "baby levy" in the form of a carbon tax in line with the "polluter pays" principle, he wrote in the latest Medical Journal of Australia. "Every family choosing to have more than a defined number of children should be charged a carbon tax that would fund the planting of enough trees to offset the carbon cost generated by a new human being," said Prof Walters, an obstetrician at King Edward Memorial Hospital. Sustainable Population Australia suggested a maximum of two, he said. By the same reasoning, contraceptives like diaphragms and condoms, as well as sterilisation procedures, should attract carbon credits, the specialist said. Full article here.

You don't like Interpol.

Now, look at this trading card game by Steve Jackson from 1995. Just a bit concerning, huh? I mean, look at those cards on display below.....look at the events!! Twin Towers, Pentagon, Hurricane and Tidalwave/Tsunami. Not saying there's anything in it but it sure gives you chills....:stunned: Just like when you see Neo's Passport in the film "The Matrix". Oh, and it's called Illuminati: New World Order :(

Haha, indeed....losing an eye is always a sure fire way to spoil things.

Haha, I know - I wasn't making a point with it....haha, I was just mentioning it.

Ok, yeah....that boundary is yours to own and if you thinks it's been crossed then I guess nobody can argue. But I will say it really amounts to nothing in my eyes.....and I think most people don't even care. Anyway - I won an award......didn't even know a thing about it or visit the voting thread either!

Hey Mark, From what I've read it seems you don't like what has come to pass in this thread - and that's fair enough, it really is - but I honestly believe nobody was really making a bit deal out of this..I mean....there's no real malice, from what I've learned. :sneaky: I guess it's just down to how the individual sees this site as part of their life...and you have invested a lot of time and posts here. So things like this seem major - when they really aren't - there's not a mass effort to piss you right off for example....it's your activity on here that has led to some minor spoofing - and Nothing more - not really. I use this forum to gather bits of information about many bands, spread news I think is important, find interesting downloads and that's about it. And I do that across MANY sites on the Internet... I have no problems with you most of the time - and certainly not personally - because that would be crazy, I don't even know you. You have every right for images of you to be taken down if you did not post them publicly, of course, BUT.... "LIFE ISN'T MEANT TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY" - your signature.. And I think you live by that phrase far too seriously at times - until the playfighting comes back towards you - when you don't appear to take it too well...(based on you recent posts). I have nothing invested here - I could leave this minute - but I use that site for my own personal gain and quite like it (some of it).....but it doesn't rule my mood. Josh is even considering leaving over this tiny spec of data on a coldplay fan site. This whole thing amounts to someone standing on you foot in a club....and shouldn't be made into Hatton vs Mayweather because it just isn't.

Not sure how well it will turn out - doing the eyes black and pupils white.... Hmmmmmmmm, I just quickly done that....Might do another, better one, later.

:) It actually suits him!

Come on....it's not that bad. It's so light hearted...

Hahaha, that's amazing Josh!! If it hadn't have been snowing a lot here then it would have been my favourite thing of the day......but I love the snow so....:)

Here's a free for all Flickr link incase you aint a Facebook member.

wow, I did see a blue van parked outside of my house earlier and thought it might have been a delivery but he was going next door. Anyway...it better come soon because I've held off downloaded the second disc, thinking I would have it myself already...

Why a blue car??

Me too....I got a "Discbox Dispatched" late night on the 3rd December........but still nothing.

People are sick of them at all times.....I've noticed.

I don't like X&Y so much but.... What the fuck are you talking about! *out of character comment of the day*

Yep. It is annoying and most of the time the venue staff don't understand - they don't care because they have to work. If I went to the supermarket checkout with my trolly full and just went straight to the front past 10 people in the queue - I'm sure I wouldn't be there for long before the staff did something.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FnUd0K1-2Y&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zs99gLc9b0M&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXvky3mgDq4&feature=related

Best Wishes on your Birthday David. I've sent you these to help on your big night out....you're welcome!!!!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6G4I4JkDkI :laugh3:

I didn't buy a ticket for London in protest of the ticket prices. Although now I'm almost so pissed off at not getting one yet that I might get one when they go on general sale....:confused: But I'd still rather see them in a slightly smaller venue (like I did last time in Wolverhampton) because anything other than the front is just horrible and it's so much stress trying to get a decent spot. I seem to always manage it but I end up hating the fans around the front of the queue.....they are just mindless sycophants. It's quite creepy.