Wyrd

Ehehehehehe, the user got blocked.

Her last post on this forum was that she got the scrapbook. That was on 16-12-2011 ... :( It's been over a month now. Ainsley, please let us know why it takes so long! And how far you are.

If this takes any longer I am going to calculate it myself already :| Serious, TS if you're too busy, I don't mind taking over and let Excel do the work :nice: Anyway, something that might be helpful: Final lists of each in this thread David the escapist The Final Track evil cat iPsy winigwl Lore admnistramation Corkus para-para-parrotdies Lukajf squareonefivesix stuardjo Timothy Q. Mouse Famous Old Painter Yggdrasil ivet the gloaming09 Italian Plastic LazyDancerKar Cheese Nip 2 rudy o R Burns rainplay stemot1978 Jack Bauer RazorEye Cyan Kat Baw8cc leodore DundahMifflin MosesTheMarshmallow Wyrd MrMagpie Alien Radio djibou megalomania Saketblitz jcoldplay dreamorlife Braddock domscientist ApproximatelyInfinite mr. x&y tomson101 Cleggy Keddie

I don't know, I just don't feel like bothering them when they are just living their lives. It's different if I'd meet them back stage or something, but in the street or in a park I wouldn't want to bother them.

Hm, okay, I understand the rolleyes now :) I think this thread still applies more to Coldplay as the Gwyneth Paltrow II thread does, haha! And welcome btw as well :hugs: (I think I would pretend to not recognize them if I would encounter them, I already did this while walking by Guy several times :shame: )

______ :thinking2:

That was so cool! Wow, this also makes me looking so much forward to the album top of 2011. Thanks evilcat for doing this! Weird question ... do you still have these data in a Excel sheet? Could you also eg. look for a top of Artists as in how many time people voted for them?

I'd say this thread would fit better in the Coldplay section than in the Lounge :nice: Why the rolleyes, btw?

But do they have huts as well? :thinking:

:awesome: I think I will (even though I am not US hihi) I saw wikipedia.org joins as well :cool: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/English_Wikipedia_anti-SOPA_blackout

Happy birthday!!! I hope you had a better than frengerly birthday :P

Please people, keep up with the time! In order to keep this thing alive it should roll. Don't take ages to do your entry :bigrcry: and keep us updated!

Your musical compatibility with alexainrainbows is Super Music you have in common includes Florence + the Machine, Coldplay, Radiohead, Gotye and Fleet Foxes. My last.fm

I can't do that in any language :( I am so easily frustrated by not being able to express exactly what I mean. Maybe I am expecting too much of language. Even if I would have been able to say exactly what I mean, then it’s still questionable if the receiver also understood it exactly like that.

I thought Grammar Nazi was the term used for anyone correcting or pointing at people's typing, whether it's grammar or spelling? I never heard of a Spelling Nazi.

What do you mean? The article above that you posted says “A song once came to Chris in a dream” Maybe in French it got translated into 'nightmare', but if you read the article without translation you will read 'dream'. :) Hm, it seems your friend did not just translate the interviews but also mingled her own opinion/view into it. For you to understand interviews like these, it might be very helpful to learn English so you can read/listen to what they mean, instead of getting lost in translation. I’m sure you don’t need an expensive course for this, but can find tools online for free. Thank you for that very helpful piece of information. :)

Ah, Ireland :) I have had good experiences with them folks Also, best Irish coffee I had was in Ireland :wacky:

:huh: Not generalize like when you say all models are hens of luxury and superficial?

1 Apparatjik 141 2 Coldplay 68 3 Lana del Rey 36 4 Jonas Bjerre 25 5 Yann Tiersen 22 6 Kaiser Chiefs 20 7 Underworld 18 8 Sigur Rós 16 9 The National 13 9 Miles Kane 13 :wacky:

Radiohead versus Muse

Hahaha, I don't even know why I made that typo because I just copied it from the paper ... in which it said 'organisatie' so :bigcry:

Dear Lory, here's a video for you :kiss: [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEAyHkFd6F4&feature=related]Kitten Duet: Spooky Halloween Music on Keyboard Piano - YouTube[/ame]

Okay, I only know the story from your point of view but reading the story I think most in here are right with saying that she’s an attention whore and not genuine interested in you. ”The night ends with her agreeing to break up with the guy (who she said she only got with because she was lost after she assumed I lost interest in her) and begin our relationship. We get together on December 12th, but due to the recent boyfriend, we couldn't be public unless she wanted to be viewed as a whore.” Here she sounds like an attention whore and not sincere. It’s kind of hypocrite don’t you think? She doesn’t want to be public with you as a boyfriend because it would make her look like a whore, you who her heart really belongs to ... yet, with some random dude she just got together with because she was lost (which is a really bad reason to get with someone anyway) she DID show to people she was with him. Why would you hook up with some random dude anyway when you feel bad because the guy you really like seems to have lost interest. Would you do that, go and hook up with some random girl because this girl is a bitch to you? I think she’s bullshitting here. And if she really means it, then she’s screwed up anyway for dealing with matters in this way. Which brings me to the next point: When she said she thinks you guys have communication problems, I think she was right. But it seems to be due to her. Just think about it, when she started ignoring you, she said afterwards it was because she thought you developed feelings for someone else. First, if she suspected that, she should have told you that, so you could say if it is true or not. Maybe not even that, but at least a wrong thing to do in response is ignoring you. If she’s afraid of losing you, then shouldn’t she try to keep you interested? Instead of ignoring you? Wouldn’t ignoring you be the exact opposite thing to her preventing losing you? To me it doesn’t make sense. I don’t understand why she had that idea anyway. Just because you didn’t contact her for a week? :S No reason to think so, did she contact you several times that week? Also, her not telling you about her seeing other guys is also a communication problem that’s there just because she doesn’t tell you this shit. If she doesn’t want communication problems between the two of you, she should have put more effort in being honest herself. It’s not fair of her to throw this at your feet. I think there's truth in what Blakexy1125 said: "pain for now and no pain in the future>lingering pain for months or years" At least for me it worked like that with the first guy I was really with (not just a kiss ;) ). He was an assh*le and it hurt me so much for months. We then broke up and I still tried to be friends with him but he just abused that I still had so much feelings for him. When I realised that (and that the hurting still hadn’t stopped) I cut him out of my life for a while. I hoped I could become friends again with him once I was over my romantic feelings for him. I got over him, the hurting stopped ... and I felt that I didn’t feel the need to even be friends with him, because now I also finally seem to be able to see him for what he really is. An ass. So as long as you still love her, be careful not to fall into the same trap as I did. She might take advantage again of your feelings for her. Her words say she loves you but her behaviour (constant flirting with other guys and even dating other guys while she was with you) shows otherwise. And I hope you will meet a girl that’s way better to you than this one. :hugs:

Just digging this thread up, because I have been a grammar Nazi again (at least in Dutch). Some newspaper I was reading started the article with saying 'The organisation literally swept the rules under the carpet' (vrije vertaling van 'the organizatie lapt letterlijk de regels aan haar laars'). I got so annoyed by it, how can you say it's literally? Did they lift up the carpet and swipe with a broom the rules underneath it? I assume they didn't. So I replied to the paper saying that they shouldn't make big mistakes like that in the article, because it's BAD. It's not a forum, it's a newspaper ffs. Urmh, yeah. :| I don't know, I like to be corrected when I make mistakes, but I guess this just doesn't happen enough. For me and for others. If people would just say journalists to not make mistakes like that, then maybe they wouldn't as much as they do now? :S

Eeeeeh, hahaha, you guys :laugh3: Rainplay, the dress looks great! It's nice/hot without being near trampy. As long as the dress covers your shoulders as it does and is long enough (so not what Macky would like to see, haha!) it is classy and you're perfectly fine in it (less covering can be classy too but is general easier seen by some as more vulgar). The color looks great too, because most might go for a dull 'color' like grey or black or brown, but colors spice up your appearance :D If you think it's still too exposing/revealing then you can wear a little jacket over it. That would still look very good.