huh?

learn your fucking history' date=' it was BRITISH land NOT ARAB. so they had no right to kill them.[/quote']

 

 

No,it wasn't

thats the problem, you've been taught all your life it was someone elses land. when it was not

it doesnt matter what will you'll have....its not about will...until you actually do something illegal' date=' which israel didnt do until they attacked...you seem to think its ok to kill if they come close to someones land. and its sick[/quote']

 

 

You always make evasive reply

evasive? its not about people's intentions..because you cant prove their intentions...not until they actually do something.

the land was legally britians....they owned it. its just as much theirs as modern day egypt land is egyptian land......

 

How Britain own it

 

 

The Egyptians own Egypt because they lived on it more than 7000 years

so if you move next to someone and they think you have bad intentions, by your reasoning htey have a right to declare a holly war on you?

they got it from britian.

 

 

I mean when the Jews bought this lands

thats the problem' date=' you've been taught all your life it was someone elses land. when it was not[/quote']

 

 

I think you describe yourself not me

evasive? its not about people's intentions..because you cant prove their intentions...not until they actually do something.

 

 

I can prove people intentions by ther actions

so if you move next to someone and they think you have bad intentions' date=' by your reasoning htey have a right to declare a holly war on you?[/quote']

 

 

They must see a strong remark on my action to know my intention

They must see a strong remark on my action to know my intention

 

 

so if they lived over 60 years before you, how can you say you know their intention?

so if they lived over 60 years before you' date=' how can you say you know their intention?[/quote']

 

What you mean? I didn't get it

I read that more people in Israel die in car accidents than as a result of Hezbollah rockets, but I'm struggling to find any statistics on this.

 

Any ideas?

oh, hang on, I've found it, well, half of it

http://www.cbs.gov.il/publications/acci03/tablch.shtml

stats from the Isreali Central Bureau of Statistics

about 450 deaths due to car accidents per year

 

Now looking for deaths due to Hezbollah rocket attacks

 

You do realise if there are fewer deaths I'm going to demand that Israel declares war on the motor car and bombs all civilian locations that they operate from.

Theres been more car related deaths than there were deaths in world war 2.

 

Your point being?

The perceived threat from Hezbollah to Israel and from global terrorism to the rest of the world is actually miniscule and not worth starting wars over.

 

If Israel feels it has a right and I guess a duty to defend itself from Hezbollah, then the same right applied to them defending themselves against car related deaths. The Israel government has duty to protect their citizens from cars, but instead, they are piling far more money into attacking other nations.

 

Assuming that the percentage of car related deaths is the same in Lebanon, with a population half the size, that'll be 225 deaths per year. Then the current conflict has killed 750 (approx), four times as many people have been killed by Israeli attacks than by cars. So I reckon Lebanon has a bigger right to self-defence and should be attacking Israel now.

 

Terrorism has always been around, and its not going to go away any time soon, but in context cars are far greater threat.

What you mean? I didn't get it

 

 

those people lived before you, how do you know their intention?

those people lived before you' date=' how do you know their intention?[/quote']

 

 

By studing their actions

'Dayside' Audience Laughs at Lebanese Deaths

 

News Hounds | August 8 2006

 

The audience for Fox News' "Dayside" sank to a new low on Tuesday (August 8, 2006) during discussion of the fighting along the Israeli-Lebanese border.

 

Watch the video Here

 

Egged on by substitute host Steve Doocy (or Doocey as the chyron spelled it at one point), the audience literally laughed at the suffering of Lebanese civilians caught between Hezbollah and Israeli bombs.

 

Doocy was interviewing Tania Mehanna, a senior war correspondent for Lebanese Broadcasting Corporation, when he chided Lebanese civilians for not standing up to Hezbollah fighters whom he said are positioning rockets in front of their homes. 'I think I'd be angry as Hezbollah," Doocy said.

 

Listen to Mehanna's answer and to the audience response.

 

Later, a man in the audience claimed that Arabs have made up the idea that Israel is bombing Lebanon.

 

Chilling.

 

 

 

There's something deeply disturbing about this. I keep thinking about what that last man said and it really has me worried on many levels.

By studing their actions

 

and so anyone that buys land legally has the intention of making a nation and taking over a region? because those are the only action they did.....so by your reasoning anyone who buys land is trying to steal more land and create a nation.

and so anyone that buys land legally has the intention of making a nation and taking over a region? because those are the only action they did.....so by your reasoning anyone who buys land is trying to steal more land and create a nation.

 

 

No of course, but in Israel case.Jews migration in hight number [ exactly Palestine ] and it's not normal thing.Don't forget the Britain decleration too

 

Don't forget also Theodor Herzl when he founded the Zionist Movement and called to establish the Jewish State

 

Jews make many aliyah to Palestine in order way

No of course' date=' but in Israel case.Jews migration in hight number [ exactly Palestine '] and it's not normal thing.Don't forget the Britain decleration too

 

Don't forget also Theodor Herzl when he founded the Zionist Movement and called to establish the Jewish State

 

Jews make many aliyah to Palestine in order way

 

they didnt conquer or steal land, they did it peacefuly and legally. so if someone does it peacefuly and legally should they be killed for that? if you move somewhere peacefuly and legally should you be murdered because of that?

they didnt conquer or steal land' date=' they did it peacefuly and legally. so if someone does it peacefuly and legally should they be killed for that? if you move somewhere peacefuly and legally should you be murdered because of that?[/quote']

 

 

Legally yes,peacefuly no

 

I showed you their bad intention by shoing you their actions

Legally yes,peacefuly no

 

I showed you their bad intention by shoing you their actions

 

 

they had no bad intentions, they set up a nation legally and peacefuly....how is that bad intentions? they did it all legally and peacefuly and were attacked because of that....