The problem with intellectually insecure whites

 

Kevin MacDonald

 

January 19, 2009

 

America will soon have a white minority. This is a much desired state of affairs for the hostile elites who hold political power and shape public opinion. But it certainly creates some management issues — at least in the long run. After all, it’s difficult to come up with an historical example of a nation with a solid ethnic majority (90% white in 1950) that has voluntarily decided to cede political and cultural power. Such transformations are typically accomplished by military invasions, great battles, and untold suffering.

 

And it’s not as if everyone is doing it. Only Western nations view their own demographic and cultural eclipse as a moral imperative. Indeed, as I have noted previously, it is striking that racial nationalism has triumphed in Israel at the same time that the Jewish intellectual and political movements and the organized Jewish community have been the most active and effective force for a non-white America. Indeed, a poll in 2008 found that Avigdor Lieberman was the second most popular politician in Israel. Lieberman has advocated expulsion of Arabs from Israel and has declared himself a follower of Vladimir Jabotinsky, the leading pioneer of racial Zionism. The most popular politician in the poll was Benjamin Netanyahu — another admirer of Jabotinsky. Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni are also Jabotinskyists.

 

The racial Zionists are now carrying out yet another orgy of mass murder after a starvation-inducing blockade and the usual triggering assault designed to provoke Palestinian retaliation — which then becomes the cover for claims that Israel is merely defending itself against terrorism. This monstrosity was approved by overwhelming majorities of both Houses of Congress. The craven Bush administration did its part by abstaining from a UN resolution designed by the US Secretary of State as a result of a personal appeal by the Israeli Prime Minister. This is yet another accomplishment of the Israel Lobby, but one they would rather not have discussed in public. People might get the impression that the Lobby really does dictate US foreign policy in the Mideast. Obviously, such thoughts are only entertained by anti-Semites.

 

But I digress.

 

In managing the eclipse of white America, one strategy of the mainstream media is to simply ignore the issue. Christopher Donovan (“For the media, the less whites think about their coming minority status, the better”) has noted that the media, and in particular, the New York Times, are quite uninterested in doing stories that discuss what white people think about this state of affairs.

 

It’s not surprising that the New York Times — the Jewish-owned flagship of anti-white, pro-multicultural media — ignores the issue. The issue is also missing from so-called conservative media even though one would think that conservatives would find the eclipse of white America to be an important issue. Certainly, their audiences would find it interesting.

 

[...]

 

http://theoccidentalobserver.net/articles/MacDonald-Hsu.html

Some people think in racial terms; I only think in people terms. What does exist are ethnic flavors and traditions; the rest is a figment of imagination. One has only to consider that we are all in essence "out of Africa", and the minor variations are so subtle as to be only cosmetically significant; that is to say, our appearances, and those subtle variations with the degree of cells with melanin in the skin, or the minor differences in our features.

I've moved past the whole thing, but I do think there's still a need for some method to ensure that unchecked discrimination based on appearance does not occur; it's hard to detect, except by statistical measure, and we need to ensure that by reducing affirmative action, we're not inadvertently allowing some bad practices to resurface.

The problem with nationalism is that it almost always floats towards one group ism, or one idea ism, where most modern Western nations have rejected such absolutes, and believe in a system which allows a diversity of opinions and cultures, provided we adhere to respecting everyone's basic rights. To co-exist is essential, and if anyone thinks they have the exact perfect way, their either nuts or the next messiah. And attempting to label things as "Western" or "Eastern" is yet another oversimplification. Things can be within a continent or geographic region; cultural region or language grouping; Nation-State or Tribal Area. But there is no real "West", only points on a compass, and a planet with a magnetic forcefield provided by an iron-nickel core and magma. States of mind, not states of matter.

Finally, Subprime Foreclosure Rates by Race

 

...

Race is sort of an artificial construct anyway. Plus it's not healthy for a population to breed only among themselves for a long period of time.

 

Wendy, you should ask yourself why you fear being a minority. Is it because you're afraid the new majority will take your rights away?

Race doesn't matter, what matters is that everybody is human.