MrMagpie Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 I don't hear it. I probably should listen to the album version more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tnspieler1012 Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Chris's "ooooh" after the first chorus, some more prominent backing vocals after that, and I think the high tremolo picked solo part at the end is a bit clearer, which I like. It's not a huge difference, but definitely a better mix. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LiquidSky Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 You are not alone, Briggins. I cant hear the difference either.. :earmuffs: :huh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMagpie Posted November 24, 2008 Author Share Posted November 24, 2008 Okay good haha. Why did they put it on the EP? haha they could have put something better in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Escapist Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Its no different at all! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coldplay101 Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 sheesh whats the deal...i thought this would be a lot different.... but i love LIJ...so i dont mind it lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PolitikClocks Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 I've replaced my album version with this version. Although it's not too much of a noticeable alteration, it's just enough to breathe some life back into this much-overplayed favourite of mine :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panicked Posted November 27, 2008 Share Posted November 27, 2008 ^Same here. I think it's much a cleaner, smoother version. It's hard to explain, but it seems less 'noisy' than the album version. I think this mix turns down some of the guitars in places, and brings out some of the separate rhythms in places also. I like it better than the album version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FixYougirl Posted November 27, 2008 Share Posted November 27, 2008 I like this version too, both are great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
escapist001 Posted November 30, 2008 Share Posted November 30, 2008 So there is no definite difference in the two versions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panicked Posted December 1, 2008 Share Posted December 1, 2008 ^See post #2! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mig-El Posted December 1, 2008 Share Posted December 1, 2008 I also think it's not worth it to have it in the EP come on just for those minimum details... they could have included anything else Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrsSeverusSnape Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 I swear to god i see no difference Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
мaямellata Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 I also think it's not worth it to have it in the EP come on just for those minimum details... they could have included anything else i agree.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tauiwi Posted December 10, 2008 Share Posted December 10, 2008 Oracle says there is a difference in tempo. Respect the oracle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*CoLdPlaY.4.EveR* Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 They are similar, I can't see (well, listen) the difference... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gotcheese2768 Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 ^Same here. I think it's much a cleaner, smoother version. It's hard to explain, but it seems less 'noisy' than the album version. I think this mix turns down some of the guitars in places, and brings out some of the separate rhythms in places also. I like it better than the album version. i agree 100 percent... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
green eyes88 Posted December 21, 2008 Share Posted December 21, 2008 im glad to hear no one else can hear the difference... i thought it was just me !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loco Posted January 5, 2009 Share Posted January 5, 2009 The differences are: Will and Guy backing Chris up with a harmony Chris singing the Wooooohh after the first chorus After the second chorus Johny tremelo picks (very fast strumming) on a higher octaves compared to the 3rd time it repeats, whereas the original version the guitar just gets louder with more distortion on the 3rd repeat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparks22 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 I can also hear a slight difference between the songs. I like the version on the lp better because it's more dynamic and a bit clearer and colder, if you know what I mean. You can hear Chris' singing better on this version. In my opinion the Osaka sun mix is noisy and not so clear. But the Osaka Mix has also its advantages. The additional backing vocals are great and the guitar is louder I think and it's better that there is no Reign of love after the song. Anyway the best version of Lovers in japan is the acoustic one. The should have put this version on the ep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mig-El Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 It took me a little time to notice the backing vocals on the osaka sun version haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Navegador Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 Let an audiophile speak for you guys. * The mastering is different: you can hear more of the background keyboards. * The hi-hat is louder. * New backing vocals. * The OSM is slightly (2-4%) faster, which makes the song proper for radio listeners (in its original version, it might sound a little "slow"). * The "hiatus" between each chord of the honky-tonky intro is shorter (about 7%). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparks22 Posted January 25, 2009 Share Posted January 25, 2009 Let an audiophile speak for you guys. * The mastering is different: you can hear more of the background keyboards. * The hi-hat is louder. * New backing vocals. * The OSM is slightly (2-4%) faster, which makes the song proper for radio listeners (in its original version, it might sound a little "slow"). * The "hiatus" between each chord of the honky-tonky intro is shorter (about 7%). wow you are a extremely close listener :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 wow you are a extremely close listener :D nice analysis thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batmotor Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 i don't understand they have put this on the EP there is not really diffrence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now