Mark or Nathan.

 

I'll set voter identity to public so we can discout people who don't deserve to have opinions.

 

 

 

 

Disclaimer: this is all in the name of fun, and shouldn't be taken as an indirect nor direct insult to either party. It should also not be taken down "proper channels" that would result in either party (or more likely one party) moaning about injustice and the fact that people can openly express their disliking for someone else until a neutral but slightly less than neutral third party named Jack is banned from the forum and "justice is done :smug:"

what can i say, man. This is a matter of Luuv (as Nathan would spell it.. cough) :heart:

...Without a doubt.

Nathan!:D

Mark!

 

 

LOL the irony. I said Mark but voted Nathan.

 

That makes me two faced........:rolleyes:

How about neither? How about both?

unanimus so far. i see.

just voted...

 

anyway, Jack, get ready to have your post reported to the mods and stuff

^ :laugh4:

Ah, decisions decisions.

 

Either someone who I find very funny and is a great guy, or someone who makes terrible puns, has been rude to me on several occasions and thinks my body consists of mainly haggis.

 

I just cant decide! Oh wait..I have already done so! LOLOLOL

What if I selected the third option? :lol:

 

 

Would I be in trouble? :uhoh:

You'd be like Julia. And by that I mean, ignorant to rules made by someone without any authority to make rules.

 

And thusly, uncool.

lol Oh Jack, you clever monkey. I voted just for the fun of it, but I'd never ban either of them if I were a mod. Which I am thankfully not, because I'm an anarchist.

I know! I'm going to start another poll just in fun too!! *skips off*

I'd say none!

12 no. 1 yes (it says 2 but one is an anonymous so it doesn't count.)

maybe is Mark logged out

moved to wheelie-bin

cheers :D just got in to PM's

Jack's still bitter about having his 'friend' banned I see...