mc_squared Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 U.S. school used secret laptop webcams to spy on pupils and parents at home By Mail Foreign Service Last updated at 4:14 PM on 19th February 2010 Comments (15) Add to My Stories A U.S. school district used laptop webcams to spy on students at home, potentially catching them and their families in compromising situations. Officials in Philadelphia can activate webcams on the computers without students' knowledge or permission, a lawsuit alleges. Plaintiffs Michael and Holly Robbins suspect the cameras captured students from Harriton High School and family members as they undressed and in other embarrassing situations, it has been alleged. Enlarge Harriton High School in Bryn Mawr: A family alleges that the suburban Philadelphia school district used school-issued laptop webcams to spy on students at home Lower Merion School District officials said the laptops 'contain a security feature intended to track lost, stolen and missing laptops,' and that the feature was deactivated yesterday. 'We can categorically state that we are and have always been committed to protecting the privacy of our students,' he said. Tom Halpern, a 15-year-old from Wynnewood, said students are 'pretty disgusted' and have started putting masking tape over their computer webcams and microphones. 'This is just bogus,' Halpern said. 'I just think it's really despicable that they have the ability to just watch me all the time.' The accusations amount to potentially illegal electronic wiretapping, said Witold J. Walczak, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, which is not involved in the case. Enlarge The Robbinses only learned of the alleged webcam images when an assistant high school principal told them their son that school officials thought he had engaged in improper behaviour at home 'School officials cannot, any more than police, enter into the home either electronically or physically without an invitation or a warrant,' Walczak said. A school district statement released late yesterday said the tracking feature would not be reactivated 'without express written notification to all students and families.' The affluent district prides itself on its technology initiatives, which include giving laptops to each of the approximately 2,300 students at its two high schools. Superintendent Christopher W. McGinley did not immediately return a message left yesterday. The Robbinses said they learned of the alleged webcam images when Lindy Matsko, an assistant high school principal, told their son that school officials thought he had engaged in improper behavior at home. The behaviour was not specified in the suit. Matsko 'cited as evidence a photograph from the webcam embedded in minor plaintiff's personal laptop issued by the school district,' the lawsuit states. Matsko later confirmed to Michael Robbins that the school had the ability to activate the webcams remotely, according to the lawsuit, which was filed Tuesday and which seeks class-action status. The Robbinses declined to speak with an Associated Press reporter at their home Thursday. Their lawyer, Mark S. Haltzman, did not return messages. The U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed the privacy of the home when it ruled in 2001 that police could not, without a warrant, use thermal imaging equipment outside a home to see if heat lamps were being used inside to grow marijuana. Technology or no, Supreme Court precedents draw 'a firm line at the entrance to the house,' Justice Antonin Scalia wrote, quoting an earlier case. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1252234/U-S-school-child-porn-probe-revealed-laptops-used-spy-pupils-home.html#ixzz0g0hFknG7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
an angel Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 That's creepy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_gloaming09 Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 wow... talk about privacy issues. that's so wrong what they did, if i was a parent or kid going to that school i'd be super pissed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mc_squared Posted February 19, 2010 Author Share Posted February 19, 2010 wow... talk about privacy issues. that's so wrong what they did, if i was a parent or kid going to that school i'd be super pissed Countless lawsuits to follow, I suspect............................... :rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Final Track Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 SPY School? April POLLS Day? CRY of the Tiger? Mark, is it you or Daily Mail who's making up these titles? :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pseudonym Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 It's Mark, that's why they're so bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mc_squared Posted February 19, 2010 Author Share Posted February 19, 2010 It's Mark, that's why they're so good. Correct.:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reilly Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 You never fail to hit new lows Mark. That was awful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mc_squared Posted February 19, 2010 Author Share Posted February 19, 2010 ^If you don't like it, it was clearly a classic.:lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Final Track Posted February 20, 2010 Share Posted February 20, 2010 Correct.:D :laugh3: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reilly Posted February 20, 2010 Share Posted February 20, 2010 I'm a cock Ho-ho..ha... :\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pseudonym Posted February 20, 2010 Share Posted February 20, 2010 Mark's a cock Yup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noonsun Posted February 20, 2010 Share Posted February 20, 2010 The U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed the privacy of the home when it ruled in 2001 that police could not, without a warrant, use thermal imaging equipment outside a home to see if heat lamps were being used inside to grow marijuana. I loved this little aside, really helped me understand the whole situation around this case more thoroughly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Final Track Posted February 20, 2010 Share Posted February 20, 2010 I loved this little aside, really helped me understand the whole situation around this case more thoroughly. *scanning for sarcasm* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobalt Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 No sarcasm, I had to read that two or three times to figure out how it was related to the rest of what I just read, and then realised it wasn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.28f6dfef0fe08bf9d6e4caa55d014e7d.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now