http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/4206450.stm

 

possibly at the 2006 world cup

 

:stunned:

Boo.

you no agree?

I agree with Reilly....

 

its loses is 'human touch' by adding all this fancy schmancy stuff. Footbal can't go all ArnIe on us.. its just not right!! :angry:

i'm not entirlly for it but then again if england lost after having a goal dissalowed in the world cup final i'm sure i'd change my mind

^ good point..

its a bad idea.. the lottery of in different decisons... makes the game better...

The majority of people (and especially those in the game) agree that goal line technology would improve football because there have been some extremely contentious decisions made concerning "goals" over the years.

A decision as to whether a ball has crossed the line or not could be made very quickly and wouldn't affect the flow of the game.

It works in cricket (with stumpings), so I don't see why it shouldn't prove invaluable in football.

I don't agree that video technology should come into play for ALL decisions, but in terms of the goal line it will be very useful indeed and is long overdue!!

damm I would give her one

:huh:

The majority of people (and especially those in the game) agree that goal line technology would improve football because there have been some extremely contentious decisions made concerning "goals" over the years.

A decision as to whether a ball has crossed the line or not could be made very quickly and wouldn't affect the flow of the game.

It works in cricket (with stumpings), so I don't see why it shouldn't prove invaluable in football.

I don't agree that video technology should come into play for ALL decisions, but in terms of the goal line it will be very useful indeed and is long overdue!!

 

I say go for it, it is used in rugby as well to determine if it was a Try or not.

The majority of people (and especially those in the game) agree that goal line technology would improve football because there have been some extremely contentious decisions made concerning "goals" over the years.

A decision as to whether a ball has crossed the line or not could be made very quickly and wouldn't affect the flow of the game.

It works in cricket (with stumpings), so I don't see why it shouldn't prove invaluable in football.

I don't agree that video technology should come into play for ALL decisions, but in terms of the goal line it will be very useful indeed and is long overdue!!

 

I say go for it, it is used in rugby as well to determine if it was a Try or not.

 

Good call!! I also like how in rugby the game continues while injuries are being treated on pitch.......................................

:huh:

 

 

we agree... :huh: x2

It's about time... Though I will miss all the gabble that surrounds controversies over goals that should/should not have been :D

It's about time... Though I will miss all the gabble that surrounds controversies over goals that should/should not have been :D

 

I don't think I'll miss it, somehow - that Man U incident last season was ridiculous and made a mockery of football.........................

finally, this would end all that crap if a shot was a goal or not.... although as the article says: "This goal-line technology is enough. Football must keep its human face and must accept errors. If we start to make it too scientific this game will lose its fascination"

It's about time... Though I will miss all the gabble that surrounds controversies over goals that should/should not have been :D

 

I don't think I'll miss it, somehow - that Man U incident last season was ridiculous and made a mockery of football.........................

 

Which one was it again, I'm embarassed as a Man U fan I can't remember :embarrased: Well, I suppose there'll always be the off-side rule to start the tongues wagging :lol:

It's about time... Though I will miss all the gabble that surrounds controversies over goals that should/should not have been :D

 

I don't think I'll miss it, somehow - that Man U incident last season was ridiculous and made a mockery of football.........................

 

Which one was it again, I'm embarassed as a Man U fan I can't remember :embarrased: Well, I suppose there'll always be the off-side rule to start the tongues wagging :lol:

 

*If I remember correctly, Roy Carroll was in goal, it was against Spurs?, a long shot? and the ball was so far over the line even Carroll couldn't believe it hadn't been given??

finally' date=' this would end all that crap if a shot was a goal or not.... although as the article says: "This goal-line technology is enough. Football must keep its human face and must accept errors. If we start to make it too scientific this game will lose its fascination"[/quote']

 

I would be happy to stick with the goalline cameras.................

It's about time... Though I will miss all the gabble that surrounds controversies over goals that should/should not have been :D

 

I don't think I'll miss it, somehow - that Man U incident last season was ridiculous and made a mockery of football.........................

 

Which one was it again, I'm embarassed as a Man U fan I can't remember :embarrased: Well, I suppose there'll always be the off-side rule to start the tongues wagging :lol:

 

*If I remember correctly, Roy Carroll was in goal, it was against Spurs?, a long shot? and the ball was so far over the line even Carroll couldn't believe it hadn't been given??

 

Oh yeah... Now I remember... T'was something like that. It was quite unbelievable