Well she's unveiling in London so I assume they will be available here too, just at whatever department store/boutique sells that particular label.

 

I found this: http://www.start-london.com/shop/zoe-tees-collection-m-111.html

 

Wow...not cheap.

 

oh god, if i like what she has to offer, i'm going to have to super-save my university allowance money in england...:dead:.

 

i also thought i'd say that tracy anderson scares the crap out of me :uhoh:

I read somewhere that her line of clothes was something to do with raising money for a kids charity... does anyone know if this is true?

Zoe tees? *feels special* That's my name! :cheesy:

 

Anywayyy, I had a feeling that she would do something like this, what with all of those fashion editions of GOOP...

I read somewhere that her line of clothes was something to do with raising money for a kids charity... does anyone know if this is true?

 

yeah it's true. you can read it here

 

http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/33543343.html

 

The line is still very much still under wraps, but we can tell you that the proceeds from every piece sold will be donated to a charity close to Gwyneth's heart - London's Kids Company.

Apologies for the dredging up of an argument several pages gone, but I wanted to add my opinion, because this is a hot topic as of late.

 

I know that it won't stop the paps from taking pictures, but we should have the decency and the class not to post them. Just because they have been taken doesn't mean that they need to be posted here. Just like in the Guy thread, they have a rule that no Nico or Joanna pictures can be posted, and you have to go off site to see them. It should be the same situation here. I'm not going to do my whole rant again because I've already done it in the Apple thread, so everyone knows how I feel about it.

 

I said in the Apple thread nothing would be done about it, and nothing was done. Just because a group of girls set a rule in place for a thread they and few others visit does not mean a) it can be done and agreed to by all visiting this thread; and b) I don't see how it'll make a difference. Last bit on this subject:

 

I think they'd probably be more concerned with certain other threads where girls who are barely at the age of consent write stories about sleeping with the boys. :confused:

 

This. If you're fretting about a couple of pictures and not keeping in mind the other content posted on here like the above mentioned, your argument is already flawed. (And I really don't care if I am part of the group used as an example, so no offense taken there Mims)

 

Back onto the newer subject of Gwyn's own line of clothes, I personally don't think they'd be that cheap, perhaps a bit more on the expensive side.

Was this mentioned here?

-->

Edith Bowman

26/03/2009

New music and chat with Edith, plus James King chats to Nicolas Cage and Gwyneth Paltrow.

You can listen to it on the BBC iPlayer here.

(starts at 1h10mins)

 

They just mentioned "Two Lovers" a few minutes ago as well. It got 2 stars in the review I think.

I didn't listen to yesterday's show yet because I'm waiting to hear today's interview with James McAvoy :)

Gwyneth Paltrow has hip-hop counsellor

 

 

Gwyneth Paltrow gets marriage advice from Jay-Z.

 

The 'Two Lovers' star - who is married to Coldplay frontman Chris Martin - revealed she has turned to the hip-hop music mogul for marital guidance.

 

Gwyneth - who has an agreement with Chris that they won't publicly speak about their relationship - said: 'Jay-Z, who I love, once said, 'You know, a relationship is hard enough without telling 80,000 people about it.' I thought that was good marriage advice.'

 

Speaking about her marriage to 32-year-old Chris - with whom she raises two children, Apple, four, and two-year-old Moses - the blonde beauty admits they work hard to avoid living in the spotlight.

 

She explained: 'When it comes to our private lives, we're private - him even more so than me. A relationship is a complicated thing, and to invite the whole world into it on purpose seems crazy. People are going to talk about it and gossip about it and speculate about it.'

 

Despite her Hollywood achievements, the 36-year-old actress says having children was the best thing she has ever done.

 

She added: 'To be honest, the most euphoria I've ever experienced was having my babies - and that's something most women can and will experience during their lives. I think God did a good job with that one!'

 

http://news.id.msn.com/entertainment/article.aspx?cp-documentid=2956903

Gwyneth would GET.IT :P

aww, that last part is so nice :nice:

 

i love how the media blows everything out of proportion, though :lol:. i swear i've heard that jay-z quote before as relayed to gwyneth, so i'm pretty sure this isn't new news, and it doesn't sound like she repeatedly goes to him for advice or anything :rolleyes:.

 

however, for my own selfish purposes, i wish gwyneth and chris were a little more beyonce and jay-z...private and out of most of the harsh gossip, but willing to admit they're married and occasionally going out in public together :P

Oh really? Sorry, I hadn't heard it before. :disappointed:

 

Oh and me too, I know they hate attention, but I'd love just ONE picture of them together, it's been YEARS and YEARS. I wish they'd put their rings back on too, it doesn't make us forget. :rolleyes:

 

You can admit you love someone without inviting them in to your world.

Video Interview of James King w/ GP.

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/radio1movies/2009/03/gwyneth_paltrow_and_me.shtml

aww, that last part is so nice :nice:

 

i love how the media blows everything out of proportion, though :lol:. i swear i've heard that jay-z quote before as relayed to gwyneth, so i'm pretty sure this isn't new news, and it doesn't sound like she repeatedly goes to him for advice or anything :rolleyes:.

 

however, for my own selfish purposes, i wish gwyneth and chris were a little more beyonce and jay-z...private and out of most of the harsh gossip, but willing to admit they're married and occasionally going out in public together :P

 

You're right - i've heard it too. It's an old quote from Jay-Z tagged on to a newer quote from Gwyneth.

 

I kind of agree with you about the privacy thing. It's great to be private about your relationship but I can't help feeling it must make it almost just as hard trying to keep it so very separate and private. Hard work! It sounds like it is more Chris' choice to have it that strict. Gwyneth seems more open to talking a little about her private life. I guess she's more used to managing the media, having grown up with it.

I for one am for their privacy from the paps and tabloids, but I would really like to see a recent pic of them together, it seems so odd to me that they can't even go to an event together, like the Grammys, they show up in seperate cars, go to seperate parties, then leave seperatly, I mean that gives the public an impression that not all is good, altho i do believe it is.

Ok i dont mind that they dont go to events together but i dont get why they cant walk around together or even go to dinner without going in different cars and what not!

 

It also sucsk that their kids cant go out with their parents at the same time

as much as i understand their desire for privacy i think they (or chris) is a bit too militant about it. it's been proven before that you can be a celebrity couple without letting the media invade your lives and being a brangelina or a tomkat and without being seen as working off of each others' successes. chris must understand that they're going to be majorly papped either way, and that not being seen together or speaking about one another only puts them in the media's bullseye MORE.

 

of course, most of my reasons for wanting them to acknowledge each other more are selfish :disappointed:

as much as i understand their desire for privacy i think they (or chris) is a bit too militant about it. it's been proven before that you can be a celebrity couple without letting the media invade your lives and being a brangelina or a tomkat and without being seen as working off of each others' successes. chris must understand that they're going to be majorly papped either way, and that not being seen together or speaking about one another only puts them in the media's bullseye MORE.

 

of course, most of my reasons for wanting them to acknowledge each other more are selfish :disappointed:

 

 

I agree and I am right there with you... SELFISH:) Just one pic of them, just one, that's all I am asking for:bigcry::baby::hug:

as much as i understand their desire for privacy i think they (or chris) is a bit too militant about it. it's been proven before that you can be a celebrity couple without letting the media invade your lives and being a brangelina or a tomkat and without being seen as working off of each others' successes. chris must understand that they're going to be majorly papped either way, and that not being seen together or speaking about one another only puts them in the media's bullseye MORE.

 

of course, most of my reasons for wanting them to acknowledge each other more are selfish :disappointed:

Absolutely MY POINT!!!

 

I mean, I do understand their wish for privacy, but trying to avoid being seen in the public together only incites the paps to get a picture taken of them together. It's kind of a race for this particular picture. Which pap will have it first, so to speak ...

I guess if they would 'feed' the paps every now and then, they will become less attractive for the paps.

 

Well, that's what I think at least but of course this is only my opinion :confused:

Maybe we should find Chris and explain our reasonings:idea2::smash:

I kind of agree with you about the privacy thing. It's great to be private about your relationship but I can't help feeling it must make it almost just as hard trying to keep it so very separate and private. Hard work! It sounds like it is more Chris' choice to have it that strict. Gwyneth seems more open to talking a little about her private life. I guess she's more used to managing the media, having grown up with it.

 

It does sound very much Chris' idea to strictly not be seen together and not Gwyn's. She's rather willing to talk about it but has to stick by what Chris has set. And it hasn't always been that way either, he used to be a bit more open, perhaps it's the effect of having the kids and then being able to spend time with baby Apple and not being able to spend time with baby Moses that much when they were newborns due to the tour.

as much as i understand their desire for privacy i think they (or chris) is a bit too militant about it. it's been proven before that you can be a celebrity couple without letting the media invade your lives and being a brangelina or a tomkat and without being seen as working off of each others' successes. chris must understand that they're going to be majorly papped either way, and that not being seen together or speaking about one another only puts them in the media's bullseye MORE.

 

of course, most of my reasons for wanting them to acknowledge each other more are selfish :disappointed:

 

I agree...and with Emma too. Chris didn't used to be so strict, during the early days he'd speak a little about her without it being such a huge deal.

 

I don't like it when Gwyneth says "I can't/shouldn't have said that because my husband will kill me/be absolutely fuming." I'm sure by that she means he just raises his voice a little, but it makes him sound so (to use Chelsea's word) militant.

 

I think it may have stemmed from all the arrests/slap wrists/warnings that came from him freaking out at the paps, maybe the only way he feels he can control himself is to take himself out of that situation completely. The thing is the more enigmatic they become the more the interest will rise.

I think it may have stemmed from all the arrests/slap wrists/warnings that came from him freaking out at the paps, maybe the only way he feels he can control himself is to take himself out of that situation completely. The thing is the more enigmatic they become the more the interest will rise.

Totally agree with the last sentence :)

 

But even if Chris tries to stay away from the paps to avoid having an outburst again ... you know what the paps are like. :( They will provoke Chris as much as possible to get another picture of him ranting or freaking out ...

That's always the big story, unfortunately.

 

So if they 'do' the 'public couple' and dose their appearance a little, maybe they will become less interesting for the paparazzies?! :confused:

So if they 'do' the 'public couple' and dose their appearance a little, maybe they will become less interesting for the paparazzies?!

 

If they do that, then there's a very good chance they will be labelled as hypocrites, and some sort of backlash would arise. :(

 

It looks like a lose-lose situation.

They could just step out of the house together once in a while though, without the kids, in case the paps descend. Just a walk in the park. Would be a novelty for the paps at first, but if they saw it enough it would become less of a huge deal.

@ Mich

 

Exactly! :)

I have just read the whole interview - think it's in Look magazine...there is a bit where she says she never can decide what to wear which drives a certain someone mad....

I soooo can see that - as clearly he is not bothered what he wears!!