Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Coldplaying

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

North American Union is Replacing the USA *Updated*

Featured Replies

The NAFTA Super Highway

This is a "mind-boggling concept," exploded Lou Dobbs. It must cause Americans to think our political and academic elites have "gone utterly mad." What had detonated the mild-mannered CNN anchor? Dr. Robert Pastor, vice chair of the Council on Foreign Relations Task Force on North America, had just appeared before a panel of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations -- to call for erasing all U.S. borders and a merger of the United States, Mexico and Canada in a North American union stretching from Prudhoe Bay to Guatemala. Under the Pastor-CFR plan, the illegal alien invasion would be solved by eliminating America's borders and legalizing the invasion. We would no longer defend the Rio Grande.

 

 

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/PatrickJBuchanan/2006/08/29/the_nafta_super_highway

  • Replies 122
  • Views 5.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So they're going to spend massive amounts of money on building this highway, and create a union no one wants just so they can eliminate illegal immigration by making it legal? Sounds a bit far fetched.

 

Wouldnt it be cheaper to build a wall between the US and Mexico and have it properly defended? Wouldnt it make it easier for people from other Latin America countries to get to the us?

  • Author

It's not that simple, the sole purpose not just being devised to eliminate America's borders and legalizing the invasion.

This is a big part of it but it's just one facet of the even bigger plan.

 

Huge projects are have already begun where private intrests come in a lobby the government to sign over the existing roads and taxing authority on the roads to then pay for and build even larger toll roads.

All the way from down in southern mexico (this is from offically government plans) right up into Canada, through Minneapolis St. Paul there's going to be these huge NAFTA higways, ok.....and part of these highways will be that each state there will be "corridors"...(i.e the Trans-Texas Corridor or Florida State Corridor)....which sound like small local names but there are international in size and scope.

Cars travelling on these toll roads will be forced to pay bumped up price unless of course they agree to have a transponder installed in their vehicle which allows cheaper, fluent access to the roads....but also will hold information about you as well as being able to track your movements. This a similar scam to the Oyster card travel passes in London where we have been almost forced into using pre-pay Oyster cards (which allow tracking of travellers) by simply making it alot more expensive to travel with out one (i.e bus prices are almost double without an Oyster card).

 

And this is just about the roads....there are other huge implications which go hand-in-hand with what Nick posted about erasing all U.S. borders and a merger of the United States, Mexico and Canada in a North American Union. Allowing the country to be overun by foreigners and this has the potential to cause cival war.....and allow the governmant to usher in martial law, upping the police state to the max.

This stuff is all by design.

I love the way your always going on about how america is turning into a north american union between canada, usa and mexico...

 

...it's happened before, look at the European Union, pretty much there is nothing between countries now, no borders, same money used.

 

In about 20 years time, the uk will be known as the state of britain in the united states of europe, where all our history all our laws will be replaced by europe-wide law, we will have to switch over to driving on the right, and speak french.

 

And isn't Canada still under british rule, with the queen as head of state?

But Oyster cards are great! They are cheaper, saves time queing, much more conveniant. Why should i worry that the government knows i catch a certain bus to and from work or that i once went on the Bakerloo line to Lambeth North?

  • Author

Well, I was just using it as an example comparison of the techinique to persuade people to change their ways and accept a new more intrusive system.

 

However, they do say that the details of travel aren't stored in a database but I really think that this type of information is far too valuable to govenrment and private companys to through away.

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Author

280906union2.jpg

 

Documents Reveal Bush/CFR "Administrative Coup D'etat" of America

Bush 'super-state' agenda to create American Union is now official

 

September 28 2006

 

Journalist Jerome Corsi has received the first documents pertaining to a FOIA request asking for full disclosure of the SPP office in its activities towards creating a Pan American Union.

 

According to a report by World Net Daily, the documents reveal that the Bush administration is running a "shadow government" without congressional oversight in conjunction with Canada and Mexico under the guise of a program "to increase security and to enhance prosperity among the three countries through greater cooperation."

 

Corsi asserts that a wide range of US administrative law is being re-written in stealth under this program to "integrate" and "harmonize" with administrative law in Mexico and Canada.

 

The documents contain references to upwards of 13 working groups within an entire organized infrastructure that has drawn from officials within most areas of administrative government including U.S. departments of State, Homeland Security, Commerce, Treasury, Agriculture, Transportation, Energy, Health and Human Services, and the office of the U.S. Trade Representative.

 

Corsi has further reported that at a recent high-level confab in Banff, an assistant U.S. secretary of state, Thomas A. Shannon , chaired a panel that featured a presentation by Prof. Robert Pastor, author of a book promoting the development of a North American union as a regional government and the adoption of the amero as a common monetary currency to replace the dollar and the peso.

 

280906Union.jpg

 

The open plan to merge the US with Mexico and Canada and create a Pan American Union networked by a NAFTA Super Highway has long been a Globalist brainchild but its very real and prescient implementation on behalf of the Council on Foreign Relations has finally been reported on by mainstream news outlets.

 

After nearly ten years of reporting by Alex Jones and the rest of the Patriot Movement, the establishment press is finally covering serious reports on the plan for a Pan-American Union, based on recent articles by Human Events columnist Jerome Corsi.

 

Back in June World Net Daily reported ,

 

"The White House has established working groups, under the North American Free Trade Agreement office in the Department of Commerce, to implement the Security and Prosperity Partnership, or SPP, signed by President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin in Waco, Texas, March 23, 2005."

 

The article even carries the admission that the Council on Foreign Relations, often the bane of sophomoric stereotypical caricatures of paranoid conspiracy theorists, played a fundamental role in crafting the policy for the homogenization of the US, Canada and Mexico.

 

"Many SPP working groups appear to be working toward achieving specific objectives as defined by a May 2005 Council on Foreign Relations task force report, which presented a blueprint for expanding the SPP agreement into a North American union that would merge the U.S., Canada and Mexico into a new governmental form."

 

 

This admission is as historical as it is concerning - the CFR moulds the foundational policy for the elimination of American sovereignty and it is passed as executive law within weeks. It is once again evident that the true vestiges of power lie within the ranks of the CFR and the Trilateral Commission who act on policy decided upon by the big brother of multinational semi-secret steering societies, the Bilderberg Group.

 

Up until five or six years ago the CFR largely operated in the shadows, only publishing its mouthpiece Foreign Affairs, and any inference that the group held sway in US politics or even existed was met by heckles of incredulity from the establishment media. Now the Associated Press openly reports their guiding hand in the drives towards global government.

 

 

The framework on which the American Union is being pegged is the NAFTA Super Highway (pictured) , a four football-fields-wide leviathan that stretches from southern Mexico through the US up to Montreal Canada.

 

270906highway.jpg

 

Corsi's work cites government websites which carry full planning details of the Super Highway and its construction has already begun in Texas with no congressional oversight whatsoever. The Trans-Texas Corridor is being overseen by The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) and the contract is owned by the Cintra corporation which in turn is owned by the King of Spain Juan Carlos. The project is being financed by the implementation of a toll that will be collected by means of GPS tracking devices installed in all vehicles and also envelops many connecting roads to the highway.

 

The NAFTA Super Highway will allow vehicles, people and goods to travel from Mexico, into the heart of America and up to Canada with little impediment, effectively erasing America's borders wholesale.

 

Coupled with Bush's blanket amnesty program, the Pan American Union is the final jigsaw piece for the total dismantling of America as we know it.

Why excatley is the north american union bad? and why should we brits care what the yanks do?

Why excatley is the north american union bad? and why should we brits care what the yanks do?

 

Well for me its i dont my country to turn into it. But other then that i dont know of anything bad about it. What is so bad about it Gareth? im being serious when i ask you this. I dont want it, but i haven't a good reason not to.

  • Author

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxCeWQ9Ge38

 

I don't want it because it's all part of the plan by the 'Elite' to destroy 'America' and turn America into a big area that will need a massive Policing due to the great increase in crime which will happen. The US government is already building huge FEMA camps that are for US Citizins - and they'll probably be for people who speak out about government corruption when things in the future get oh so very bad.

 

You see....I don't want the Elite to screw the US over because it's going to have a huge impact on how the people all across the world are controlled. What the Elite can do in America they can do in the UK, France, Germany etc....

 

And the very fact that I have been fighting them so much on 9/11 means I don't want to sit around while it all goes to shit. I'm not just a strong believer in things like 9/11 but everything else the same people are trying to pull on the world - that's what it's about. America is part of my world, part of the planet I live on and I don't want it made into a giant prison. I want to be able to visit someday and not be thrown into a cell because I shouted "9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB" or something similar.

 

It's simply fighting against the extremely bad people.

Here's a random bit of trivia for you...

 

Did you know that HBO is banned in Canada for being too American?

 

Our cultural watchdogs are so paranoid about our country not having an identity that they're constantly imposing random anti-American stuff like this on us to try to keep the American media from brainwashing us. It's actually the sort of stuff being talked about in this thread that fuels this mindset. The only way to watch HBO is to illegally steal US satellite tv (because it's also illegal for the willing to pay for it) or else wait for a Canadian channel to pick up one of the shows.

 

Trivial in the extreme? Definatly. If the last hundred years of threats and nightmares about the US taking over take place, will it matter? Probably not. Does the average Canadian actually want to have the option to watch HBO? Probably yes. If Maclean's magazine's whining is anything to go by, definatly yes.

 

But if history has anything to say on the matter, empires have a nasty habit of jumping over the boulders only to trip on a tiny patch of gravel. If there are actually people plotting this, I get the impression it hasn't occured to them that this sort of institutionalized anti-americanism is as deep rooted as it is. Because for the last 50 or 100 years or so, (possibly even as far back as the war of 1812), this sort of thing has been threatened as an excuse to forcefully develop some sort of Canadian culture.

  • Author

It's happening alright.

 

And, I didn't know HBO was banned in Canada.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxCeWQ9Ge38

 

I don't want it because it's all part of the plan by the 'Elite' to destroy 'America' and turn America into a big area that will need a massive Policing due to the great increase in crime which will happen. The US government is already building huge FEMA camps that are for US Citizins - and they'll probably be for people who speak out about government corruption when things in the future get oh so very bad.

 

You see....I don't want the Elite to screw the US over because it's going to have a huge impact on how the people all across the world are controlled. What the Elite can do in America they can do in the UK, France, Germany etc....

 

And the very fact that I have been fighting them so much on 9/11 means I don't want to sit around while it all goes to shit. I'm not just a strong believer in things like 9/11 but everything else the same people are trying to pull on the world - that's what it's about. America is part of my world, part of the planet I live on and I don't want it made into a giant prison. I want to be able to visit someday and not be thrown into a cell because I shouted "9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB" or something similar.

 

It's simply fighting against the extremely bad people.

 

 

Good Video

  • Author

North American Union threat gets attention of congressmen

Resolution aimed at blocking merger, funding of 'NAFTA superhighways'

 

World Net Daily | October 2 2006

 

WASHINGTON – While several members of Congress have denied any knowledge of efforts to build "NAFTA superhighways" or move America closer to a union with Mexico and Canada, four members of the House have stepped up to sponsor a resolution opposing both initiatives.

 

Rep. Virgil Goode Jr., R-Va., has introduced a resolution – H.R. 487 – designed to express "the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System or enter into a North American Union (NAU) with Mexico and Canada."

 

"Now that Congress is preparing to take up the issues of the North American Union and NAFTA superhighways, we are moving out of the realm where critics can attempt to disparage the discussion as 'Internet conspiracy theory,'" explained Jerome Corsi, author and WND columnist who has written extensively on the Security and Prosperity Partnership – the semisecret plan many suspect is behind the efforts to create a European Union-style North American confederation and link Mexico and Canada with more transcontinental highways and rail lines. "This bill represents a good first step."

 

Corsi explained to WND that the Bush administration is trying to create the North American Union incrementally, under the radar scope of public attention.

 

"Even today," said Corsi, SPP.gov has a 'Myths vs. Facts' section that denies the administration is changing laws or working to create a new regional government. Unfortunately, the many references on SPP.gov to Cabinet-level working groups creating new trilateral memoranda of understanding and other trilateral agreements makes these denials sound hollow."

 

The resolution introduced by Goode had three co-sponsors: Reps. Thomas Tancredo, R-Colo., Ron Paul, R-Texas, and Walter Jones, R-N.C.

 

The "whereas" clauses of the resolution lay out the case against the North American Union and NAFTA Superhighways as follows:

 

 

Whereas, according to the Department of Commerce, United States trade deficits with Mexico and Canada have significantly widened since the implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA);

 

Whereas the economic and physical security of the United States is impaired by the potential loss of control of its borders attendant to the full operation of NAFTA;

 

Whereas a NAFTA Superhighway System from the west coast of Mexico through the United States and into Canada has been suggested as part of a North American Union;

 

Whereas it would be particularly difficult for Americans to collect insurance from Mexican companies which employ Mexican drivers involved in accidents in the United States, which would increase the insurance rates for American drivers;

 

Whereas future unrestricted foreign trucking into the United States can pose a safety hazard due to inadequate maintenance and inspection, and can act collaterally as a conduit for the entry into the United States of illegal drugs, illegal human smuggling, and terrorist activities;

 

Whereas a NAFTA Superhighway System would be funded by foreign consortiums and controlled by foreign management, which threatens the sovereignty of the United States.

The resolution calls for the House of Representatives to agree on three issues of determination:

 

 

The United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System;

 

The United States should not enter into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada; and

 

The President should indicate strong opposition to these or any other proposals that threaten the sovereignty of the United States.

"As important as this resolution is," Corsi said, "we need still more congressional attention. Where is congressional oversight of SPP? We need congressional hearings, not just congressional resolutions."

 

H.Con.Res.487 has been referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and to the Committee on Internal Relations for consideration prior to any debate that may be scheduled on the floor of the House of Representatives.

  • 3 weeks later...

Just so you know - I researched the National ID cards that he was talking about in the library of congress. It's all there. I couldn't believe it.

  • Author
^^That video doesn't prove anything. All it does is show a man spouting about things he offers no proof of. That WND article similarly does nothing to prove the case that the government is moving to form a North American Union. All it does is say that four congressman have sponsored a bill against things that are just rumors.

 

No, no....go find out it's true. It's all happening and you can find out for yourself.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Author

THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION.

 

http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2006/aug06/06-08-23.html

 

Some info.

 

 

AND THIS...

 

The NAFTA Superhighway

 

Ron Paul / LewRockwell.com | October 31 2006

 

By now many Texans have heard about the proposed “NAFTA Superhighway,” which is also referred to as the trans-Texas corridor. What you may not know is the extent to which plans for such a superhighway are moving forward without congressional oversight or media attention.

 

This superhighway would connect Mexico, the United States, and Canada, cutting a wide swath through the middle of Texas and up through Kansas City. Offshoots would connect the main artery to the west coast, Florida, and northeast. Proponents envision a ten-lane colossus the width of several football fields, with freight and rail lines, fiber-optic cable lines, and oil and natural gas pipelines running alongside.

 

This will require coordinated federal and state eminent domain actions on an unprecedented scale, as literally millions of people and businesses could be displaced. The loss of whole communities is almost certain, as planners cannot wind the highway around every quaint town, historic building, or senior citizen apartment for thousands of miles.

 

Governor Perry is a supporter of the superhighway project, and Congress has provided small amounts of money to study the proposal. Since this money was just one item in an enormous transportation appropriations bill, however, most members of Congress were not aware of it.

 

The proposed highway is part of a broader plan advanced by a quasi-government organization called the “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America,” or SPP.

 

The SPP was first launched in 2005 by the heads of state of Canada, Mexico, and the United States at a summit in Waco.

 

The SPP was not created by a treaty between the nations involved, nor was Congress involved in any way. Instead, the SPP is an unholy alliance of foreign consortiums and officials from several governments. One principal player is a Spanish construction company, which plans to build the highway and operate it as a toll road. But don’t be fooled: the superhighway proposal is not the result of free market demand, but rather an extension of government-managed trade schemes like NAFTA that benefit politically-connected interests.

 

The real issue is national sovereignty. Once again, decisions that affect millions of Americans are not being made by those Americans themselves, or even by their elected representatives in Congress. Instead, a handful of elites use their government connections to bypass national legislatures and ignore our Constitution – which expressly grants Congress the sole authority to regulate international trade.

 

The ultimate goal is not simply a superhighway, but an integrated North American Union – complete with a currency, a cross-national bureaucracy, and virtually borderless travel within the Union. Like the European Union, a North American Union would represent another step toward the abolition of national sovereignty altogether.

 

A new resolution, introduced by Representative Virgil Goode of Virginia, expresses the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a NAFTA superhighway, or enter into any agreement that advances the concept of a North American Union. I wholeheartedly support this legislation, and predict that the superhighway will become a sleeper issue in the 2008 election.

 

Any movement toward a North American Union diminishes the ability of average Americans to influence the laws under which they must live. The SPP agreement, including the plan for a major transnational superhighway through Texas, is moving forward without congressional oversight – and that is an outrage. The administration needs a strong message from Congress that the American people will not tolerate backroom deals that threaten our sovereignty.

  • Author

More information on the incremental dismantling & takeover of the USA. This type of thing will eventually effect everybody.

 

MINUTE MAN PROJECT

The Minuteman Project (MMP) is a citizens' Vigilance Operation monitoring immigration, business, and government.

 

http://www.minutemanproject.com/

 

 

STOP SPP.COM

Counting on all Americans to join us in battle against the North American Union!

 

http://stopspp.com/stopspp/

 

This page from the site is interesting.

  • Author

The more people who know about what's happening the better chance there can be 'something' done. It also helps people to see what a low, dirty and disgusting government they have.

I think most people know how low and dirty their government is, its just they dont want to mess with it for fear of something worse.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.