Jayzo Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 :laugh3: :laugh3: :laugh3: I really hope Nadal don't win :\ Agreed :D!! I want Fed to win overall :dance:. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mc_squared Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 Agreed :D!! I want Fed to win overall :dance:. Yup - if he doesn't win, we'll all be totally fed up.:rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudy_o Posted January 29, 2009 Author Share Posted January 29, 2009 I'd go with Fed. I hope Verdasco can smash Rafa :smash: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saffire Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 Ditto. His playing style is far too "brutish".:dozey: Fed, on the other hand, is poetry in motion.:D Federer is a bore. You might as well be playing against a Nazi computer. Anyway, I can't wait to see the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle (Nadal) beat him again in the final. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudy_o Posted January 29, 2009 Author Share Posted January 29, 2009 Wooo~~ Raphael Nadal~!!! :clap: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tnspieler1012 Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 I much prefer Fed to Nadal, but it sucks that it's these two again and again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudy_o Posted January 29, 2009 Author Share Posted January 29, 2009 ^ Yeah. I want to see.. err maybe Djoko vs Murray? Or Roddick, Simon, Gasquet, Tsonga or anyone else; other than Fed & Rafa! :\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mc_squared Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 Federer is a bore. You might as well be playing against a Nazi computer. You obviously don't understand tennis. Federer is the most skilful player ever. He has every shot in the book and makes most other players look ordinary. Nadal is admittedly great too, but the way he plays he'll have burned himself out in a few years as he's far too intense.;) That's basically what happened to Lleyton "Blew It" Hewitt.;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saffire Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 You obviously don't understand tennis. Federer is the most skilful player ever. He has every shot in the book and makes most other players look ordinary. Nadal is admittedly great too, but the way he plays he'll have burned himself out in a few years as he's far too intense.;) That's basically what happened to Lleyton "Blew It" Hewitt.;) I understand tennis. I'm just bored with watching Federer. He doesn't really have a "style" like other players do. I might as well watch Pong. Although I do enjoy seeing him get frustrated. For me, tennis is about the human element - something you don't often see from Federer, who was undoubtedly a straight-A student. Plus he looks like his mother dressed him to go on the court, "Now honey, I want you to finish up this match before 1:00 and when you get back there's a ham & cheese sandwich waiting for you next to your algebra textbook. Also, don't forget to study your vocabulary." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tnspieler1012 Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 Yes, but that was before his rebel streak... "No tea and crumpets for me today mum, I'm off to play the grand piano!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i'maveryneatMonster.' Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 I think Federer has style, unlike other players, and he's very precise and even if you call him "ballerina", he's very elegant. Let's just stop talking shit about the ones we dislike and just see what happens, at least, that's what ill do, and even if Fed loses (again:rolleyes:) you can't deny he's one of the greatest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tnspieler1012 Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Make fun as I might, Federer is truly one of the most amazing players to watch because every stroke looks absolutely effortless. No other player can cover ground as seamlessly and gracefully as federer, much less place the ball as well. Problem is he's too good. He has a better win record in majors than Tiger Woods. We're so used to seeing him win, that we get bored as :censored: !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudy_o Posted January 30, 2009 Author Share Posted January 30, 2009 Federer is just amazing. No one can deny that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i'maveryneatMonster.' Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 And no one voted for Davydenko :rolleyes: I think it's sad that people support players because of the rankings.. I'm not pointing anyone, but it's always the same, let's pretend for a moment that the next year "A" dude is world no. 1, then, everyone supports the dude. He messes up, and then "B" dude is no. 1 and then everyone loves him. That's sad.. very sad. You can see that with Jankovic u_u Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*CoLdPlaY.4.EveR* Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 What a great game Verdasco-Nadal!!!!! :clap: Verdasco is doing really good, fantastic!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i'maveryneatMonster.' Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 What a great game Verdasco-Nadal!!!!! :clap: Verdasco is doing really good, fantastic!!! Indeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mc_squared Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 What a great game Verdasco-Nadal!!!!! :clap: Verdasco is doing really good, fantastic!!! Yes. It's a fantastic semi, and the commentators are now calling Verdasco "Superman"!!:P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mc_squared Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Federer is just amazing. No one can deny that. Yes. The reason why the Aussie fans love him so much is because he's a joy to watch every time he plays, whether he wins or loses. Plus any player who beats him has to play out of their skin, so you know that whenever Fed does lose a "big" match, the match itself has to have been something special (even usually when Nadal beats him). Players like Djoko and Tsonga come along and cause upsets from time to time, but they can't keep it going tournament after tournament as Fed and Nadal can. That's why when it comes to the majors, the two of them are still pretty much untouchable. Any other player who wants to win one of the big tournaments knows he will more than likely have to beat both Fed and Nadal to do so, and to do that you have to be virtually superhuman. Even when Fed and Nadal have "off" days they can still usually beat 80% of the rest.;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[email protected]. Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Fed, on the other hand, is poetry in motion.:D :lol: totally agree. yes he is. wow, nadal vs verdasco was such a great match. set 3,4 and 5 were poetry in motion too! ;) verdasco would have deserved the entry of the final on sunday. he fought very hard! that were amazing 5 hours! 193 : 192 points.... but no nice end. hard to loose with a double fault i think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mc_squared Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 :lol: totally agree. yes he is. wow, nadal vs verdasco was such a great match. set 3,4 and 5 were poetry in motion too! ;) verdasco would have deserved the entry of the final on sunday. he fought very hard! that were amazing 5 hours! 193 : 192 points.... Fed is now going to have a big advantage in the final though, as Nad is going to be hurting after that marathon!!:stunned: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[email protected]. Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Fed is now going to have a big advantage in the final though, as Nad is going to be hurting after that marathon!!:stunned: fedex is now in nadals position. when fed was no.1 nadal always had one day more to rehabilitate.. its just fair :smug: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudy_o Posted January 30, 2009 Author Share Posted January 30, 2009 And the Williams sisters won the 'women' doubles title. :angry: I wanted Hantuchova-Sugiyama to win :bigcry: And no one voted for Davydenko :rolleyes: Davydenko was injured and didn't play. :D What a great game Verdasco-Nadal!!!!! :clap: Verdasco is doing really good, fantastic!!! :clap: Bravo Fernando!!!!! Fed is now going to have a big advantage in the final though, as Nad is going to be hurting after that marathon!!:stunned: Definitely :D :dance: :dance: :dance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mc_squared Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 And the Williams sisters won the 'women' doubles title. :angry: It's about time those two were sex-tested.:dozey: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudy_o Posted January 30, 2009 Author Share Posted January 30, 2009 lol :laugh3: I'd go with Federer & Safina. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mc_squared Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 lol :laugh3: I'd go with Federer & Safina. Go where? To Dubai??:rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now