April 4, 200917 yr :laugh3: I'm about to go to bed anyway... I'll probably be here only for a couple of minutes.
April 4, 200917 yr It's 4:30 pm here. I wanted to play tennis now but my one of my friends is sick and the other one just got busted by his mom for having salvia. (She was looking through his trash and found a bag - how freakish is that?!)
April 5, 200917 yr Good sound "texture". I don't like a song that sounds too smooth or too rough. It's got to make my ears feel different.
April 5, 200917 yr Yea, I see that as true as well - good "texture" as in opening up a new surprise as each page is turned.. and the music itself can't be too "pure" sine wave - I agree, nature uses the same devices. Bird songs as well - the liquid melodic sounds that capture our attention are best if there's imperfections of sorts, and variations.. And yes too - a buildup is essential, and I think a changeup too - it almost has to transition into something different after the climax, or it lacks greater staying power in the imagination. Just listening to Paul McCartney's 'Baby I'm Amazed', it's really an interesting piece, as is Coldplay's Life in Technicolor. But some songs work well without the changeup, if they're not too long; probably the repeating of "sweet notes" works very well, with subtle variations (meadow lark, enter's stage left)..
April 5, 200917 yr That's something too - music is better (at least initially) as simply music! I think the power of music and imagination by far outweighs visuals; in fact, the visuals often diminish the music, unless the song's been 'out there' for so long, and then the video offers something new to explore.. lest I think so - it seems that way. I can see the original artists performing the song, but something about the music as it's own. In art, less is more.
Create an account or sign in to comment