Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Coldplaying

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Israel / Lebanon / Iran / Syria - Middle East conflict!

Featured Replies

I agree with that entirely. Just look at how much Dubai and the UAE are flourishing under immense oil profits.

 

As for using citizens as shields, I think this whole thing is blown way out of proportion. Israel's just being very indiscriminant about what and where they attack.

 

No, they are trying their best to increase the amount of Lebonese killed. It's apart of their political war with Israel. But you have a good point, i forgot about Dubai and UAE. The rest of the middle east should follow their lead.

  • Replies 2k
  • Views 110.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Actually Hitler didn't terrorize anyone into voting for him. He was such a charismatic leader that he was easily able to obtain the majority of the vote.

 

Not that I'm saying what he did was right, but that's what comes when you spread democracy through parts of the world like that. Hamas also comes to mind.

 

Very true.

Well theres alot of support in south Lebabon for Hisbollah - the same part of the country that Israel occupied for 20 years. There not as popular nationally and hence why they didnt gain a more important role in the government. As far as i know Hisbollah and Hamas do a lot of local community work - most of it is actually good but its all aimed at gaining support and money. Thats why people vote them. They do nice things at local level.

 

Yes. And they "butterup" the South Lebonese so when war time comes they have supporters.

In 1984 Ronald Reagan won 525 - 13 in electoral votes... even though the popular was ~60 - ~40...

 

Yes but thats the voting system you've always used. Everyone knows the rules. Its very clear both nationally and internationally even if it is a crap system.

 

Has anyone ever tried to change it?

In 1984 Ronald Reagan won 525 - 13 in electoral votes... even though the popular was ~60 - ~40...

 

And he was one of the best presidents the U.S. ever had.

In 1984 Ronald Reagan won 525 - 13 in electoral votes... even though the popular was ~60 - ~40...

 

 

not a fair comparison.. being as we're the only nimrods in the free world who go by electoral votes as opposed to 'real votes'.. :\

And he was one of the best presidents the U.S. ever had.

 

 

 

I liked the guy.... but 'best'??? I highly doubt Reagan-moics and Ollie North were great for his tenure...

not a fair comparison.. being as we're the only nimrods in the free world who go by electoral votes as opposed to 'real votes'.. :\

 

Right, which is why I put the 60% - 40% comparison in there. I think that election, maybe the election of 1936, was the most one sided in American history... but that's still nowhere close to the 95% mentioned above.

 

As for Reagan as a man, I wasn't alive during his presidency, but he sure was an effective speaker. "The Great Communicator" of course. I would say he was one of our best. Not "the" best, but one of them.

 

But we digress. Go back to topic, shall we?

i said what is said because that's what we were taught in civics class. That a party that gets almost 100% of the votes was probably doing something to control the votes, since it's practically impossible to get 100% of the votes since ppl are so different. And that's what we were taught in history about hitler...

 

they said the new democracies, which are only "democracies" always show they get 98% of the votes and not 100 so the world would think it's really a democracy. But i dunno what to think anymore... im so confused...

 

over here it is usually a 60% majoraty (with coalitions alot of the time because there are many many political partied to choose from here)

  • Author

Secret 2001 Pentagon Plan to Attack Lebanon

Plan for "Serial War" revealed by General Wesley Clark

 

by A Concerned Citizen

 

July 23, 2006

GlobalResearch.ca

 

 

"[The] Five-year campaign plan [includes]... a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia and Sudan" (Pentagon official quoted by General Wesley Clark)

 

According to General Wesley Clark--the Pentagon, by late 2001, was Planning to Attack Lebanon

 

"Winning Modern Wars" (page 130) General Clark states the following:

 

"As I went back through the Pentagon in November 2001, one of the senior military staff officers had time for a chat. Yes, we were still on track for going against Iraq, he said. But there was more. This was being discussed as part of a five-year campaign plan, he said, and there were a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia and Sudan.

 

...He said it with reproach--with disbelief, almost--at the breadth of the vision. I moved the conversation away, for this was not something I wanted to hear. And it was not something I wanted to see moving forward, either. ...I left the Pentagon that afternoon deeply concerned."

 

Of course, this is fully consistent with the US Neocons' master plan, "Rebuilding America's Defenses," published in August 2000 by the Project for the New American Century (PNAC)

 

And, as PNAC's website ( http://www.newamericancentury.org ) notes, that the lead author of that plan, Thomas Donnelly, was a top official of Lockheed Martin--a company well acquainted with war and its profit potential.

 

It's no surprise that Republicans are starting to talk about withdrawing troops from Iraq; the troops will be needed in Lebanon. And maybe Sudan and Syria?

gareth. ive only been here a short time but i wanna see some of these predictions come true.... u say they do so i wanna see it happen....

  • Author

Which ones do you want to see come true?

 

Frankly, I want none of them.

 

That's why getting this news out and about is important - it's more likely to put off the criminals who are behind the schemes.

Hmm well this conflict has been described as a "proxy war" between the US and Iran several times... I'd hate to see our stance with Iran get much worse.

 

But it will, because Iran's not going to relinquish their uranium enrichment technologies. (why should they anyways?) :rolleyes:

  • Author
(why should they anyways?) :rolleyes:

 

Because Fox News says "they are gonna nuke us". ;)

 

 

I mean it's ok for the US to use Depleted Uranium in it's weapons which is a byproduct of the enriching of natural uranium. When most of the fissile radioactive isotopes of uranium are removed from natural uranium, the residue is called depleted uranium. It causes radioactive problems in the area used for years ans years.

  • Author

Bare in mind that the UK, Germany & the Czech Republic just voted against a imminent cease fire

 

 

 

Israeli opinion after Qana - MIND BOGGLING

 

The Truth Will Set You Free | Aug 1 2006

 

And you thought the massacre was outrageous - you aint seen nothing yet.

 

To underscore Israel’s defiance of international opinion, Mr Olmert declared last night: “The fighting is continuing . . . There is no ceasefire and there will be no ceasefire in coming days.”

 

He added: “We will pursue Hezbollah at any place and at any time and we will not permit it to regain its capacities . . . We are paying a high and sad price in [Lebanese] human lives, in destruction [but] we will not renounce our right to live normally without the threat of terrorism.”

 

Mr Olmert’s defiance is rooted in ROCK-SOLID domestic support. Polls show 80-95 per cent support for continued strikes, with no evidence that the Qana killings or last week’s bombing of a UN observer post caused a flicker of the needle.

Not to be out-done by their madman-in-chief, the Israeli public chimes in with their own fetid quotes. . .

 

“The Israel Defence Forces is the most moral army in the world” Oh dear :stunned:

 

--Eli Yishai, Trade and Industry Minister

 

 

* * *

 

 

“We Won't Fold”

 

--Ma’ariv newspaper

 

 

* * *

 

 

“We are not hesitating, apologising or relenting. If the rocket fire at Israel continues from Qana, we will continue to bomb Qana. Today, tomorrow, the day after that. HERE, THERE and EVERYWHERE. The children of Qana could be sleeping peacefully in their homes now, if the messengers of Satan had not taken over their land and turned our children’s lives into hell”

 

--Ben Caspit, Ma’ariv

 

 

* * *

 

 

“Every air force sortie WAS JUST ASKING FOR an on-camera tragedy like the one at Qana yesterday. IT WAS JUST A QUESTION OF TIME and it is clear that the tragedy is playing into the hands of Hezbollah”

 

--Nadav Eyal, Ma’ariv

 

 

* * *

 

 

Ehud Olmert today faces the first real test of his leadership since the outbreak of the war in Lebanon. Will he panic in the face of the international media lynching over the deaths of civilians at Qana, and order a halt to the war, or ****will he keep his composure and continue with the military action UNTIL HIS POLITICAL AIMS ARE ACHIEVED.**** Ten years ago a panic-stricken Shimon Peres ordered an immediate halt to Operation Grapes of Wrath [after the first Qana disaster]. In the end, the convoluted agreements reached with Hezbollah then were the root cause of the present fighting

 

--Hagai Huberman, Hatzofe newspaper

 

Let's see. I seem to recall our own personal madman declaring that "Terrorists" are people "who will blow up innocent people in order to achieve tactical objectives." It seems fairly obvious that Israelis are terrorists without parallel.

 

“I think the war’s a necessary evil. It needs to happen to make the border safe. Unfortunately the ‘evil’ is innocents getting hurt. But I blame Hezbollah for that”

 

--Stephen Smith, a broker

 

Nevermind that under this financial wizard's twisted cost/benefit analysis it's always the Lebanese people who DIE, for Israel's benefit.

 

And finally, the most DAMNING quote of all . . .

 

“I’M STAYING. [!!!!!!!] I have more chance of winning the lottery than being hit by a Katyusha [missile].[!!!!!!!] We are suffering too much from Hezbollah. They should get in there, finish the whole thing and get it done once and for all”

 

--Freddy Masika, lottery kiosk operator in Kiryat Shemona

BINGO, buddy! You just hit the jackpot!

 

Kiryat Shemona is in the northern-most part of Israel. He just proved that Israel is turning a nation into rubble - right before our eyes - and murdering hundreds if not thousands of innocent civilians to prevent rocket attacks that are less likely to hit one of its citizens - in the northern-most part of Israel - than its citizens are likely to win the lottery.

 

When was the last time any of you won the lottery?

 

I rest my case.

 

The state of Israel is an abject failure - time to go back to the drawing board.

 

Please, spread it far and wide.

Fox News should be banned !

Fox News should be banned !

 

Seconded.

 

Anyone see the interview with Nabih Ayad on Hannity & Colmes? (it was on InfoWars, so I bet Gareth saw it)

 

Hannity disgusts me. *shakes head* "Unbelievable"

I believe they don't like Muslims... those who manage fox news,,, naughty people... hiltlers press were simialr with the jews... hmmmmmm !

I believe they don't like Muslims... those who manage fox news' date=',, naughty people... hiltlers press were simialr with the jews... hmmmmmm ![/quote']

 

Well I do know they are all about oil, so I wouldn't doubt it. I never really watched Fox News but my boss watches it at work... I never realised how many commercials for oil companies they show. "This show brought to you by...BP!" ... :rolleyes:

  • Author

010806girl2.jpg

 

Another Israeli Myth Exposed: There Were No Hezbollah Rockets In Qana

Meanwhile, northern Israeli residents say they have more chance of winning the lottery than getting hit by a Katyusha missile

 

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | August 1 2006

 

There were no Hezbollah rockets and no Hezbollah militants in the village of Qana that was leveled by the Israelis on Sunday night, according to village residents and Red Cross workers stationed in the area. Another apologist fabrication to justify Israeli atrocities has been exposed as a total fraud.

 

Prime Minister Ehud Olmert claimed Sunday Hezbollah were, "hiding places for rockets inside the village and the village itself is a safe haven for those who launch rockets."

 

Israeli media mouthpieces and drooling Neo-Cons have repeatedly tried to portray Israel's rampant war crimes as a right to self-defense, even in light of mounting atrocities and the deliberate targeting of aid workers, ambulances, UN observers, and women and children who slept in their beds and never woke up.

 

"There were no Hezbollah rockets fired from Qana - this was the justification given by the Israelis for bombing the shelter and again carrying out a massive bombardment all that night long and well into the next day of that entire village," Dahr Jamail told the Alex Jones Show.

 

Jamail is a Christian Lebanese American independent journalist who has worked for the Guardian, the Independent, and the Sunday Herald.

 

"They claim that it was Hezbollah's fault, that they were forced to murder these innocent people because Hezbollah continues to fire rockets into Israel."

 

"I spoke with two residents at the scene of the bombing, two people who were nearby, who lived in the village and they said of course there were no Hezbollah rockets fired from this village because when Hezbollah does that all of the villagers clear out immediately because people are well aware that once those rockets are fired Israel is going to retaliate with a massive air strike on the entire area."

 

"So no rockets were fired according to the residents there."

 

Jamail also verified this contention by speaking to aid workers in the nearby city of Tyre.

 

010806girl.jpg

 

"These claims were backed up not only by residents but when I talked to the Lebanese Red Cross they said the same thing - they said no when we go into these villages usually we can find evidence if there is any - we will find rocket launchers, we will find guns, we will even find some Hezbollah fighters," said Jamail.

 

"One of them who was actually the training manager of the Red Cross down there, he said there was 100 per cent no evidence - that city was clear - there was no evidence of any rockets fired from there whatsoever."

 

Jamail said that "without a doubt" Israel was intentionally targeting civilians, with a particular focus on medical workers and rescue workers.

 

He said that the policy was based on blood thirst and collective punishment with an overarching agenda to pull Iran and Syria into the mire so Israel can justify subsequent attacks on those countries.

 

For those still choosing to live in cloud cuckoo land and believe the fallacy of the 'right to self-defense' argument - consider the words of one resident of Kiryat Shmona, a town on the northern most border of Israel.

 

“I’M STAYING. [!!!!!!!] I have more chance of winning the lottery than being hit by a Katyusha [missile].[!!!!!!!] We are suffering too much from Hezbollah. They should get in there, finish the whole thing and get it done once and for all.”

 

More chance of winning the lottery than being hit by a Hezbollah missile. Compare that to the untold horror that has been inflicted on a nation of innocent people whose very day to day existence has been turned into simple question of survival.

 

Prison Planet.tv members can listen to the entire interview with Dahr Jamail by clicking here. Please consider becoming a subscriber by clicking here.

I was not laughing at your post !

010806girl2.jpg

 

Another Israeli Myth Exposed: There Were No Hezbollah Rockets In Qana

Meanwhile, northern Israeli residents say they have more chance of winning the lottery than getting hit by a Katyusha missile

 

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | August 1 2006

 

There were no Hezbollah rockets and no Hezbollah militants in the village of Qana that was leveled by the Israelis on Sunday night, according to village residents and Red Cross workers stationed in the area. Another apologist fabrication to justify Israeli atrocities has been exposed as a total fraud.

 

.

 

Does not suprasie me....

They will pay for their crimes against Humanity

They will pay for their crimes against Humanity

 

Hmmm this statement reminds me of something... oh yeah. :)

 

"Muse - Take A Bow"

 

Corrupt

You're corrupt

Bring corruption to all that you touch

Hold

You behold

And beholden for all that you've done

And spin

Cast a spell

Cast a spell on the country you run

And risk

You will risk

You will risk all their lives and their souls

 

And burn

You will burn

You will burn in hell, yeah you'll burn in hell

You'll burn in hell

Yeah you'll burn in hell

For your sins

 

And our freedom's consuming itself

What we've become

It's contrary to what we want

 

Take a bow

 

Death

You bring death, and destruction to all that you touch

Pay

You must pay

You must pay for your crimes against the earth

Yeah hex

Feed the hex

Feed the hex on the country you love

 

Now beg

You will beg

You will beg for their lives and their souls

 

Now burn

You will burn

You will burn in hell, yeah you'll burn in hell

You'll burn in hell

Yeah you'll burn in hell

You'll burn in hell

Yeah you'll burn in hell

For your sins

 

 

They will ALL pay for their crimes against the Earth.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.