Really

 

 

If the open desert a perfect buffer zone,so why the built Bar-lev Line.If the open desert a perfect buffer zone [ it's mean this land a military land ] why they make many civil projects there

 

I don't think that they will make the tourists spent their vacation among a war

 

Its no use having a buffer zone if you dont defend it. Please use your brain.

Because they wanted to be cautious. wanted to put all the defence up that they could. They wanted to be prepared if Egypt did attack again. They added the Bar lev line to add to their defence, the more the better. the desert itself wouldnt be a bufferzone they'd need a military there.

 

Civil projects? like what? examples...

 

 

Make all these defensive zones and you tell me that they intent to give back Sinai.This preparing of someone who decide to stay his rest life on this land

 

 

Civil project like this resort

 

Its no use having a buffer zone if you dont defend it. Please use your brain.

 

explain

Where military's are their is civil things like that to make money. Like i said if Israel was interested in the land it wouldnt have GIVEN it back. that right there proves my whole point

Maldini you dont have a military mind. this is easy to understand!

Where military's are their is civil things like that to make money. Like i said if Israel was interested in the land it wouldnt have GIVEN it back. that right there proves my whole point

 

What you know about Taba?

Its a Egyptian village near the Gulf of Aqaba. Other then that, nothing.

That was a border issue about the fine print in the treaty. what's your point about it?

 

 

Maldini you dont have a military mind. this is easy to understand!

 

 

Really Mr.Erwin Rommel

You know of Rommel, im impressed. He was a good commander. Hitler was a fool to make him commit suicide.

That was a border issue about the fine print in the treaty. what's your point about it?

 

 

 

 

I would like to say that Israel didn't want to leave Sinai but after the defeat in war and defeat in battel of Laws.Israel left Sinai

haha they werent defeated, they were under control of most of the sinia when they gave it up. They left on their own free will for the promise of peace, they were not forced to do so.

You know of Rommel' date=' im impressed. He was a good commander. Hitler was a fool to make him commit suicide.[/quote']

 

 

Why you imrpessed:rolleyes:

 

 

Why you put Abu Dhabi flag

Well your education is lacking in history and about other nations. I didnt know you knew about him.

haha they werent defeated' date=' they were under control of most of the sinia when they gave it up. They left on their own free will for the promise of peace, they were not forced to do so.[/quote']

 

 

So why they composed an international commission for this case as a arbitrator

To settle the conflict. Its late im going to bed. Goodnight Maldini, we'll debate later

Well your education is lacking in history and about other nations. I didnt know you knew about him.

 

 

My education is lacking:laugh3: :laugh3: :laugh3:

 

What about Abu Dhabi flag

To settle the conflict. Its late im going to bed. Goodnight Maldini' date=' we'll debate later[/quote']

 

 

Goodnight Nick

My education is lacking:laugh3: :laugh3: :laugh3:

 

What about Abu Dhabi flag

 

I liked the way it looked. See you later. have a good day

who was won by land after war?egypt or isreal

Israel.

Military Orders Suggest Iran Attack

 

Newsmax | September 18 2006

 

Two recent orders by the American military have led some observers to conclude that the U.S. is preparing for an attack on Iran.

 

One order was a "Prepare to Deploy" command sent to a submarine, an Aegis-class cruiser, two minesweepers and two mine hunters, telling the ships’ commanders to be ready to move by Oct. 1.

 

The other was a request from the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) for a fresh look at long-standing U.S. plans to blockade two Iranian oil ports on the Persian Gulf.

 

The orders created a buzz within the military because there are few places in the world where minesweepers could be significant – chief among them, the Strait of Hormuz in the Persian Gulf, where about 40 percent of the world’s oil passes each day.

 

 

"Coupled with the CNO’s request for a blockade review, a deployment of minesweepers to the west coast of Iran would seem to suggest that a much discussed – but until now largely theoretical – prospect has become real: that the U.S. may be preparing for war with Iran,” according to a special report in Time magazine.

 

 

The U.S. military routinely makes plans for many different scenarios, and the vast majority of them will never be carried out.

 

"And yet from the State Department to the White House to the highest reaches of the military command, there is a growing sense that a showdown with Iran – over its suspected quest for nuclear weapons, its threats against Israel and its bid for dominance of the world's richest oil region – may be impossible to avoid,” Time reports.

 

The magazine’s reporters interviewed dozens of experts and government officials to find out what an attack on Iran would consist of – and what its repercussions might be.

 

First of all, most observers believe the attack would not involve ground forces and would instead be a massive air campaign against Iran’s 18 to 30 nuclear-related facilities.

 

 

But many of the targets are hardened, and would have to be struck repeatedly to ensure that they were destroyed or severely damaged. Some sites are in populated areas, and civilian casualties would be a certainty, according to Time. And there would be no guarantee that the strikes would destroy all nuclear-related sites, because some sites could be undiscovered.

 

What’s more, the attacks would spark retaliation from Iran that could include ordering a Hezbollah attack on Israel and stepping up the funneling of money and weapons to the Taliban in Afghanistan and insurgents in Iraq.

 

The likelihood that Iran would also seek to close the Strait of Hormuz is high, and a disruption of the oil supplies flowing through the strait could send oil prices skyrocketing. That in turn could spur a stepped-up military effort by the U.S. that could even include the "worst case” use of ground forces in an effort to topple the Iranian regime, retired Marine General Anthony Zinni told Time.

 

For that reason, Zinni believes an attack on Iran is a "dumb idea.”

 

 

And that is why the U.S. has sought to emphasize a possible diplomatic solution, Time concludes. One Bush administration official told the magazine:

 

"Nobody is considering a military option at this point. We're trying to prevent a situation in which the President finds himself having to decide between a nuclear-armed Iran or going to war. The best hope of avoiding that dilemma is hard-nosed diplomacy, one that has serious consequences."

We better attack Iran soon

Ive been reading that Bush and the military are sending covert teams into Iran to scope out airstrike targets. Its looking like we might start bombing them sometime soon. Its looking like most of Europe does not want to deal with Iran's threat, so the US or Israel are going to take action.

We better attack Iran soon

 

I presume your gonna volunteer for the army then?