All you have to do is report the post, doesn't matter if you can see us or not :)

 

 

 

Then why wasn't that thread locked? I know it's not being posted in anymore,but that is not the point.....

Just because it wasn't locked doesn't mean we weren't around...

 

And if it's not being posted in any more then that's exactly the point :)

No,it should have been locked as my report was received.

we are always here, we discuss about the board all the time, if you can't see us, it's a different thing :P

 

 

Do you discuss how amazing I am?

No,it should have been locked as my report was received.

 

we are the ones who decide that :P, and sometimes we take a time to remove spam and things like that because we all have jobs/school/etc

 

Do you discuss how amazing I am?

 

all the time my dear! :lips:

Not when the thread has my name on it.

This is one of the most negative, angry threads I have ever seen. Everyone here should do yoga or something. Breathe. I realize the mods here have difficult jobs, and everyone here has about an equally fair point. I don't think Nathan (IF he was banned specifically over this) should be banned over the discussion going on here. Just my two cents.

 

That being said, you mods do work very hard and put a lot of effort & love into this forum. Thank you.

 

(By the way, I think if you added up all the "just two cents" on this forum, you would have... like, probably a dollar. Which actually isn't very much, so nevermind.)

Also I love the fact that anyone who has an opinion that agrees with mine is a "Nathan Fangirl" I guess I'm a Jack fanboy cos I tend to agree with him on a lot of things. You must be a "Ren fanboy" as well, or have you crawled out of his bum for this conversation? Ren is the biggest hypocrite of the lot though, he'll pretend to have his own opinions and then just turn his back on them as soon as he is criticised for it. The best example is "The Usual Suspects" Ren was "rebelling" by joining that group but then as soon as Mr Logic and Reason (Mark) made a statement which insinuated that Ren was wrong to be in that group, Ren then left that group and proceeded to lick the bum of Mark. At least Lore realised it was ok to be in that group as it was completely tongue in heek and not malicious at all.

 

I'll reply this the same way you've done so many times in the past: You don't fucking know me so stop pretending you do. I do have my own opinions and i get in trouble for expressing them sometimes and other times i just don't say anything at all and ignore all the crap some people say because I'm a mod after all and i have to be neutral or at least try.

 

It's not the way you put it in that example. The argument that time was taking over the whole forum and we were fighting in several threads and i wanted to put an end to that. I'm a mod and can't go around insulting people the way you do all the fucking time. Was i not rebel enough for your standars for not calling him names? Too bad then. We actually talked in a public thread and we both agreed to ignore each other , he took back all the things he said and asked me to please quit that group if i actually meant what i said ( stop fighting and ignore each other in peace) so i did it to put an end to that and honestly i was sick and tired of all that crap anyway. So what's the big deal? I'm best friends with mc now? No i'm not, i don't really like him and that's no secret but i can be civilized.

I don't think Nathan (IF he was banned specifically over this) should be banned over the discussion going on here. Just my two cents.

 

And nor would he be. We don't like banning people and very rarely do it.

I can think of only 4 people in the last 7 years, and Nathan is one of those 4.

I GOT IT WRONG.

 

I = not everyone.

 

I = a fraction of total members! Total members = 40,329

 

I = 1/40329

 

General = applies to no paricular party = applies to everyone = applies to 40,329 members = applies to 1/40,329 members

 

I can has gold star?

 

 

 

But of course. I was simply stating Lore's quote could be used against her with those lines, because technically, we aren't supposed to be posting that stuff.

 

I realize that. I wasn't referring to Lore's post in the context of anyone's reactions to it.:) Gold Stars for all!

And nor would he be. We don't like banning people and very rarely do it.

I can think of only 4 people in the last 7 years, and Nathan is one of those 4.

 

Wow, I only remember one other regular member getting banned. It can't be an easy choice for the Mods.

Not when the thread has my name on it.

 

There you are Rick, I've binned the thread in question. I would have done it earlier but I didn't see it before, and when the reported posts forum has 20 or so new threads in, I don't visit them all due to a lack of time.

Thanks David..:D

So, someone got banned. Shouldn't we now like... have a few moments of silence?

Yeah...

 

 

.....................................................................

Yeah true,peace can now resume..

Don't you guys do temp bans? Those aren't too big a deal, but can serve as a warning...

 

I'm not referring any user in particular or anything. Just wondering.