Wow,I didn't know from where you get this information.But I challenge you if you can tell where,when and why Arab Nations treat palestinians people badly

 

If we hate the jews as you say,why we only attack them just in Israel

I mean we can attack them in USA or any place there are everywhere and there are jews in many arab countries,did we attack them?

 

Because its a jewish state, why bother with a few minor jews when you're at war with a whole country. the fact is, arab nations treated AND treat palestinians just as badly as Israel but no palestinians fight or try to stop the arab nations.....hmmm wonder why...

Because its a jewish state' date=' why bother with a few minor jews when you're at war with a whole country. the fact is, arab nations treated AND treat palestinians just as badly as Israel but no palestinians fight or try to stop the arab nations.....hmmm wonder why...[/quote']

 

 

Show me a proof that saying we treated Palestinians bad as Israel

 

By the way,you confess that Israel treating Palestinians bad [ in fact inhumanity ]

They dont treat them well, but palestinians could have such better lives if not for the terrorist and their goverment. they spend so much time and money on terrorism that the average palestinians is poor. if they were to put as much time and money into their peoples society and education great things could be accomplished. it is the corrupt palestinian leaders and politicians and terrorist who are holding them down.

They dont treat them well' date=' but palestinians could have such better lives if not for the terrorist and their goverment. they spend so much time and money on terrorism that the average palestinians is poor. if they were to put as much time and money into their peoples society and education great things could be accomplished. it is the corrupt palestinian leaders and politicians and terrorist who are holding them down.[/quote']

 

Really,I think the Palestinians spend millions on struggle actions;)

 

Did you know or listen about the Israeli siege?

The result of Israeli siege and cut of aid from Euorpe and USA:

 

1- The Palestinian economy shrunken27%

2- The unplyment dubling

3- The poverty reach to 50%

4- The individual income decrease 30%

5- More than 150,000 didn't get their salaries

Really,I think the Palestinians spend millions on struggle actions;)

 

Did you know or listen about the Israeli siege?

The result of Israeli siege and cut of aid from Euorpe and USA:

 

1- The Palestinian economy shrunken27%

2- The unplyment dubling

3- The poverty reach to 50%

4- The individual income decrease 30%

5- More than 150,000 didn't get their salaries

 

If they would spend more money and time on building a better goverment and on the people instead of corrupt politicians and terrorism, many more people would have better lives.

 

The "Siege" was a good thing, were not sending money to terrorist.....We dont have to, nor should we ever pay terrorist money.

Maldini... no offense... but I can barely read some of your posts because of the grammar. So, I'm going to bow out of this argument. Take it away, mrcool.

If they would spend more money and time on building a better goverment and on the people instead of corrupt politicians and terrorism, many more people would have better lives.

 

The "Siege" was a good thing, were not sending money to terrorist.....We dont have to, nor should we ever pay terrorist money.

 

 

Corrupt polticians and terrorism:uhoh:

again without one little proof:sleeping:

 

Do you want to read some scandals of Israeli leaders?:sneaky:

Back to the beginning of this thread - lately I've been hearing of a ramping up to the possibility of the US bombing Iran. A friend suggested this might be about to start, owing to a pattern of behavior seen before previous attacks - rumors of plans, placement of the fleet, and denial by the US administration.

Apparently a well-respected veteran reporter at the NY Times wrote something about serious plans being laid out, and another source mentioned it as well..

Any comments?

As far as I`m involved in observing the world`s politics I think I have to share my opinion with you. There is no military will of invading Iran neither in USA or in any other country (for exapmple Israel I will explain why). USA has large profits on sucking out the iraqi petrol but in the country itself this war has major social disapproval. Now the people of the United States are fairly aggresive (the most of them) and their opinions on worlds politics vary between "We should invade this or that country" and "We should nuke this or that country". If you look at the statements of Osama you will see his suggestions that violence is legitimate in order to protect "our lands", these are the lands which he considers as muslim lands: Iraq, Egypt, Iran, Afghanistan etc. On the other hand Bush and Blair are saying: "Violence is legitimate in order to protect our lands". The only difference is that when they say "our lands" they mean the whole world. USA stopped caring about international law and treaty obligations a long time ago and started dealing as the world`s policeman- choosing which regimes to overthrow and which not. There are many political and social crimes which have been left aside for example the turkish strategy to use force to get the Kurds out of their lands and homes. There was an exreme aggressiveness during the execution of this strategies but off course many of you have not even heard about it. Why? Minimum of 80% of the turkish weapons come from the USA and if you check their armed forces you will see what I`m talking about. Turkey doesn`t have a strong economy but it does have several hundreds of F-16s, F-4 Terminator, C-275 and now they are buying new attack helicopter.

With all this said you are wondering what is my point. My point to give you a very basic picture of how the world functions nowadays. But why isn`t it possible to invade Iran? First of all of economic reasons- the US Goverment will hardly approve next operation in the next 2-3 years. Many generals stated at the end of 2006 that if there is a new operation this time against Iran they will withdraw from the army. After that comes the question about the power of Iran. Iran is may be the leading country of the region (Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Lebanon EXCLUDING Israel) and the losses of US military will be even more greater than these in Iraq. The population is very sensitive to new losses since this is one of the prime themes on the social agenda in the USA. Their population (as well as any other for example Adolf Hitler got the most public approval rate in history of Germany until Germany conquered land after land and it declined not so significantly afterwards) is happy as far as nobody talks about US soldiers killed, about US vehicals destroyed off coure except when the numbers are insignifficant. BUT these numbers will be greater than the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan combined. Now it is a pattern that each US president starts at least one war (Bush- Clinton- Bush) during his presidentcy. I think that if the invasion occurs it will happen not sooner than 2010. Israel is not capable of air strike just because their jets F-15I and F-16 do not have that range to fly over several hostile countries whole Iraq and than strike Iran. If there is some action it will be handled by MOSAD. As some of you know may be GWBush ordered the CIA to take care of operation which purpose is to take out the iranian goverment by using propaganda, desinformation etc. This just prooves that USA will not invade Iran during the presidentcy of GWBush.

Personally I`m not an admirer of any political regimes or ideas I`m just an observer. In my post there are some quotes by Noam Chomsky.

You make some very good points there. Thanks for that.

 

I agree that a war with Iran is more likely to happen in a few years - for the reasons you stated.

 

However, the complete and utter madness within the Anglo-American regime means that there's always a chance of something ridiculous happening.

 

I mean - I even think 9/11 was a step too far.

 

Sure, plenty of people have fallen for it and there have been some terrible freedom snatching and illegal wars carried out all in the name of 9/11 - but I feel there are far too many people who haven't been suckered - which increases the possibility of another major false flag "attack" to dwarf 9/11 and attempt to mute the horrible truth.

 

And because of a major film release, 9/11 Truth will hit a huge peak in September this year.....which makes me very nervous indeed.

 

I'm sure some of the 9/11 perpetrators have been mulling this over all weekend at the annual Bilderberg meeting, which was held in the Ritz Carlton Hotel in Istanbul, Turkey.