i see your point but i still dont think its no good for the sport if the world championships decided that way. i think i made a thread about this while back.

i see your point but i still dont think its no good for the sport if the world championships decided that way. i think i made a thread about this while back.

 

Maybe, but it would be even worse if it was proved somebody won through an illegal advantage.

Hamilton ultimately lost due to a third pit-stop which those other cars didn't appear to need for some reason......................... :rolleyes:

well i doubt hamilton would have been on a three stop stagedy if he hadnt lost that many places

Who can say?:rolleyes:

no one but i imagine mclaren chose soft tyres on his second stint because he had to overtake loads of cars.

no one but i imagine mclaren chose soft tyres on his second stint because he had to overtake loads of cars.

 

True, but that was perfectly legal.;)

don't know much about F1 as only get into it one late night watching the Hungarian Grand Prix in 2006 when most people crashed etc and Jenson Button won.

really thought Hamilton would win oh well.

completely deserved

Hamilton lost when his gearbox played up.

ha! in your face!

ha! in your face!

 

Took him long enough to win it though :P

yesh. he's such an ass.. :D the finnish press is now wondering why didn' t his wife party with him

World's fastest soap opera indeed... :confused: Wonder how long the appeal process is going to take?

 

In the meantime, YAY KIMI! :D

 

Much as I would have liked Hamilton to win it, I've been a fan of Kimi's for way too long not to be really happy for him. And it's probably better for Hamilton in the long run not to win starting out. But who knows...