Evolution could have never been proved since it was said. All the evolutionists showed some unrelated facts as a proof or they made their proof themselves. we believed them many many years and we put evolution -unless the not found evidences- at the base of science.

Today; as the scientific development it is obvious that we are living in a world, in a universe which is created perfectly by God.

Every little detail, first the human body proves us this truth. If we look around we will understand nothing can not happen as a result of some coincidences. The living life can not start by a non living…

The aminals living in the sea can not be transformed into (by coincidences)reptiles. This is completly imposibble. A little fish can not decide to go out of water to find food(!!), it can not change it gills into lungs. İt can not start an evolution. If there had been an evolution we could find half fish- half reptile creatures’ fossiles. But noone could achieve this. Also this brings a question to the minds: why did evolution stop? Why there are still millions of fish swimming in the seas? Why didn’t they all become reptiles after evolution?

Evolutionists said that the proof of evolution will be found in the future. But as it is clearly seen evolution wasn’t proved many many years ago, is not being proved nowadays and will never be proved sometime in the future. Science should bury evolution in history as a funny fable of funny men.

Mate this the Coldplay section. You should maybe take your theories to the lounge.

Nice first post... :stunned: :huh:

:lol:

How does this relate to Coldplay?

 

and sorry buddy maybe you should take an extensive course on evolution before you state such a boldly incorrect entry.

 

'Evolution could have never been proved since it was said.'

Your first sentence is completely wrong right off the bat.

Evolution is a theory. Maybe you should check out the definition of a theory ahead of time. You can't prove or disprove a theory. You can either have evidence that supports or refutes it.

 

:dozey:

uhhhhhhhhhmmm....

Now, now, now.

 

 

It's so obvious, you guys. The first man and woman emerged from Tom Cruise's vagina. Don't you all know that????

 

 

 

 

 

 

What? Tom Cruise doesn't HAVE a vagina? PSH! *makes it a religion*

:lol:

I like chocolate.

I like... cheese.

Bump!:)

People who debate against evolution generally know nothing about it. They have a really basic idea of what it is in their head, which is an incorrect idea. I strongly suggest reading one of Richard Dawkins' many books on the topic as he is the best modern writer on the subject.

 

Evolution is such a fascinating and amazing thing, I feel sorry for people who don't believe it or even lack proper knowledge of it.

If jumping genes jump, then can one species be related to another without mating?? When DNA moves across lines not normally crossed, it leads on to wonder..

I always found it fascinating how niches are followed in isolated regions of the globe. How the marsupials could have evolved and a Tasmanian Tiger resulted, which is remarkably unrelated to the big cats of Africa and Asia.

Some Christians believe in Evolution, you can believe in both. Evolution is scientifically false, that is why I don't believe in it, for me religion is immaterial. I cannot deny simple science proving it false.

Sorry but how is it false?

Better question is how is it correct? I've seen no logical or scientific evidence to prove it while I've seen a lot to disprove it. It should be all about science and evolution is all about wishful thinking, it's a insult to science. The whole theory of evolution is unscientific. We once thought the world was flat and the center of the universe some day we'll realize evolution is just a boring story made up by bored men.

I always objected to the whole science vs. religion, evolution vs. creationism debate. It's a false dualism. Proving or disproving one does not prove or disprove the other. There's no conflict when someone believes in both God and evolution (with the exception of staunch fundamentalists), or neither. They are independent issues.

this argument will never be proved.

 

you're all wasting your time.

 

everybody has different beliefs.

and as long as you have them, why try to prove the other side wrong?

 

I like to sit on the fence.

I think both sides offer valid arguments.

but i like to live my life, and not worry why i'm here

because I won't be here forever.

you should do the same.

this argument will never be proved.

 

you're all wasting your time.

 

everybody has different beliefs.

and as long as you have them, why try to prove the other side wrong?

 

I like to sit on the fence.

I think both sides offer valid arguments.

but i like to live my life, and not worry why i'm here

because I won't be here forever.

you should do the same.

 

 

Thankyou sir, well said.

Better question is how is it correct? I've seen no logical or scientific evidence to prove it while I've seen a lot to disprove it. It should be all about science and evolution is all about wishful thinking, it's a insult to science. The whole theory of evolution is unscientific. We once thought the world was flat and the center of the universe some day we'll realize evolution is just a boring story made up by bored men.

 

I've never seen any of this apparent mass of evidence against Evolution, please do elaborate or at least link me to a source with this "proof"

 

The proof is in animals, if you understand evolution, it's quite easy to see how it works

 

it's not a case of one minute being one creature then all of a sudden ZOMGZZZ you have a long neck, that's not how it works at all and I can see why people wouldn't think it was a great theory if all they knew about it was they primary school level of understanding that they teach you in school

 

I'm sorry if I'm patronising you here, but natural selection makes absolutely perfect sense and accounts for a lot of the animals alive today, I am on and off reading a huge account of Evolution called "The Ancestor's Tale" It's main goal is to go back and find the oldest common ancestor of all living things today, it's an amazing read but sadly not many people will read it.

I like to sit on the fence.

I think both sides offer valid arguments.

but i like to live my life, and not worry why i'm here

because I won't be here forever.

you should do the same.

 

I know you mean well here but that last paragraph really annoyed me, Fuck knowledge lets just have a laugh? I completely disagree, the world/universe is such a fascinating place, learning about it is one of the joys of life as far as I am concerned

Why was this bumped anyway??

 

There's a "FRIENDS" episode for almost every topic:

Ross & Phoebe: Evolution

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nfcs3BBrRbU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nfcs3BBrRbU[/ame]

(Haha, "Yellow" is in there as well :lol: )

I've never seen any of this apparent mass of evidence against Evolution, please do elaborate or at least link me to a source with this "proof"

 

The proof is in animals, if you understand evolution, it's quite easy to see how it works

 

it's not a case of one minute being one creature then all of a sudden ZOMGZZZ you have a long neck, that's not how it works at all and I can see why people wouldn't think it was a great theory if all they knew about it was they primary school level of understanding that they teach you in school

 

I'm sorry if I'm patronising you here, but natural selection makes absolutely perfect sense and accounts for a lot of the animals alive today, I am on and off reading a huge account of Evolution called "The Ancestor's Tale" It's main goal is to go back and find the oldest common ancestor of all living things today, it's an amazing read but sadly not many people will read it.

 

It's an insult to science, with nothing scientific in it. I simply cannot believe in something without any facts or good theories behind it.

Not trying to be stupid or naive.. But what facts are there to back creationism. Nathan made a good point with the animals. That is something we can see with our two eyes, something that has been proven. I dont care what people beleive in, but I cant deny how much we resemble apes.. some people think it has nothing to do with evolution, and i just dont know really what to think... but I do believe there is a connection.

 

But, yes, for those who believe in creationism lend me some facts, and theories that support the idea. The only ones I ever hear are ones from the bible...

We were never apes though, that is a HUGE confusion people have, In very very simple terms there was an animal that due to various factors ended up splitting off into 2 different species before dying off itself, Humans and Apes were those 2 branches, we are related in that sense, but it's not like it is so often incorrectly stated that we evolved from apes.

 

MrNick please, read a modern book on evolution, like I said earlier Dawkins has the best accounts of it. The theory itself has evolved from Darwin's original thesis. I dunno how you can sit there and claim there to be no proof and for there to be no solid theory. It's ridiculous.