Charlie Brown would have been a better choice for the 2nd single

[Albie]

I think so

[Imke]

Hi Albie

[Albie]

hello

[Destrokk]

Aloha Albie.

[Albie]

damn coldplay its not growing on me like etiaw

[the_gloaming09]

definitely.

 

listening to the song now it's much better than this paradise crap.

[admnistramation]

In the end, it doesn't make the album any better. :(

[anacaren08]

If paradise was not a single, maybe it would have just been the "a whisper" of MX, not saying a whisper is bad though :P . and we could just skip paradise on the album if we don't like it. It just sucks, cuz charlie brown would have represented MX better I think and I would have loved hearing it get played on the radio.

[the_gloaming09]

In the end, it doesn't make the album any better. :(

 

that is true. and after 2 singles I won't be buying the album.

[ja5219]

Maybe, at the very least Charlie Brown seems to be more of the "radio" type they would play here in the US. But I do love Paradise so .. that's a tough choice, still chose no.

[Lore]

I agree

[WeddingDom]

Charlie Brown >>>>>>>>>>>>>>:toilet:>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that crap called Paradise

 

:nod:

[mrman78]

Probably, but that's just because I adore CB. I like Paradise too though. I'm thinking they went with Paradise as it's dare I say slower and more 'epic-sounding' (well at least a decent attempt) than CB... Maybe as ETIAW was so upbeat they didn't want CB.

[yoyo911]

all of the sons that I heard so far 6 or 7 of them are soulless.

 

U might say Charlie Brown would be the best Worst option,? because all are the same for me except" us against the world" but it is only one song.

 

I see how money changed them soooooooooooo much.

[Hartroc]

all of the sons that I heard so far 6 or 7 of them are soulless.

 

U might say Charlie Brown would be the best Worst option,? because all are the same for me except" us against the world" but it is only one song.

 

I see how money changed them soooooooooooo much.

 

Us Against the World is the worst of the new songs. :laugh3:

[Connor!42!]

most definitely..............i have no idea why they chose Paradise instead of CB........

 

 

This sums up how terrible Paradise is: "Life goes on it gets so heavy"

[blankshore]

If they wanted to sell a lot of records, yes. Charlie Brown should have been the second single.

 

If they wanted to stop people in their tracks and say: "what the heck is this?" then they made the right choice.

 

I'm glad they picked the latter.

[w1ll1am7]

In the end, it doesn't make the album any better. :(

 

but it isn't any worse because you haven't heard it as one piece.

 

I'm not making any judgements until I hear it all as one piece.

 

If it's a so called 'concept album' then I am sure it will fit somewhere

[musicman1990]

"Charlie Brown" is too obvious. It's a nice song and very catchy, but it doesn't really bring anything new to the table like "Paradise" does. It's better to leave it for 3rd or 4th single.

 

 

 

Dave

[Jedi Leo]

No. I am so happy Paradise is in my hands now, while waiting for MX.

[ColdplayFanatic16]

I disagree. All of their new songs are FANTASTIC!!! I repeat. ALL.

[bosly1]

Para-Para-Paradise, Para-Para-Paradise, ohhhhh ohhhhhh

[bosly1]

I disagree. All of their new songs are FANTASTIC!!! I repeat. ALL.

 

I'm inclined to agree with this statement.

[FJK_12]

would you say that because CB is not released as a single, we might never hear it on the radio much (which it deserves)?

[eFrK]

Of course Charlie Brown would have been a better second single. I really think Charlie Brown will become the "Clocks" from Mylo Xyloto! :laugh3: