Your Government (as well as mine ans the US) are commiting themselves to a horrible' date=' bloody [i']staged[/i] war.

 

It's tough but true.

 

As an American, I can second this point. It's absolutely true, though my government never told me it was. I wonder why?

Israeli forces Slaughter U.N. Observers

 

Kurt Nimmo | July 25, 2006

 

After Israel bombed a U.N. shelter near Khiam, Lebanon, killing four observers, Daniel Ayalon, Israeli ambassador to the United States, had the audacity to tell Wolf Blizter of CNN he expects an apology from U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan for complaining.

 

Of course, this is nothing new, as the Israelis routinely attack the United Nations and little if anything comes of such murderous crimes against humanity.

 

For instance, on April 18, 1996, in the Lebanese village of Qana, during Israel’s “Operation Grapes of Wrath” invasion, the IOF killed 106 Lebanese refugees seeking protection at a Fijian UNIFIL compound. As usual, the Israeli government expressed regret, but words are cheap, especially considering the fact the IOF consistently issues such meaningless apologies after slaughtering innocents. The Zionist state added insult to injury, or rather mass murder, by not paying compensation to the victims.

 

A few days earlier, on April 12, an IOF attack helicopter fired a missile at an ambulance in the village of al-Mansuri, killing two women and four young girls. On the same day the Israelis killed refugees at Qana, a “helicopter gunship attack on a house in the village of Upper Nabatiyeh on April 18, 1996 … killed nine civilians, including a newborn baby, six children under thirteen years old, and their mother,” according to Human Rights Watch.

 

No word if Daniel Ayalon or his counterpart at the time expected an apology from the families of the victims.

 

Israel’s IOF has engaged in numerous massacres in Bint Jbeil, Khan Yunis, Maaraka, Jibaa, Qibya, Saida, Trqumia, Homeen al-Tahta, Seer al-Garbiah, Yohmor, Sabra and Shatila, on and on, ad nauseam, killing thousands of Arabs, massacres so common we rarely hear about them here in America, what with our “fair and balanced” corporate media.

 

The numbers of United Nations personnel killed by the IOF pales in comparison. However, on 3 December 2002, sixty-four U.N. workers issued a petition demanding the Israeli military stop “beating and killing” them, according to the Memory Hole, an appropriate venue, as the corporate media ignored the petition.

 

“You might think that such a strongly-worded statement sent by more than five-dozen United Nations workers to the ‘Middle East’s only democracy’ would be highly newsworthy. Apparently not. Among the very few media outlets to cover it were Reuters, the BBC, the Independent (London), Ha’aretz (Jerusalem), and the Jerusalem Post. Notice that all these sources are British or Israeli. Not one American media outlet has covered the story.”

 

“[F]or two years United Nations staff have been subject to escalating harassment and violence by Israel’s military, so that the protection supposed to be afforded by the blue letters of the UN is being steadily eroded,” the petition explains. “UN staff—international and Palestinian alike—have been verbally abused, stripped, beaten, shot at, and killed by Israeli soldiers.”

 

Tragically Iain Hook was not the first person working with the UN to die at the hands of the IDF this year. In March, Kamal Hamdan was shot and killed while travelling in a clearly marked UNRWA ambulance in the West Bank. In April, Husni Amer died in Israeli military custody in Jenin after, according to witnesses, receiving a brutal beating by the soldiers at the time of his arrest. From its silence, we presume the Israeli authorities have ignored UN requests for an investigation and report of these two incidents, and have not seen fit to take any disciplinary action against the soldiers involved. To us, this seems to confirm a pattern of utter contempt on the part of the Israeli army for the lost lives of these men, the safety of UN staff or the minimum standards imposed by international law which should protect UN staff and other humanitarian workers.

 

Again, no word if Daniel Ayalon demanded an apology.

 

Addendum

 

It appears the IOF targeted UNIFIL for a very specific reason, namely to send the message the Zionist state doesn’t need no stinkin’ peacekeepers, especially peacekeepers who mostly evacuate citizens from Israel’s killing fields. More specifically, it was a message sent in regard to the prospect of yet another multinational peacekeeping force sent to Lebanon. As Bush, or rather the neocons, tell us, Israel must be left alone to go after Hezbollah, that is to say Lebanese resisting invasion and occupation.

 

It didn’t take long for the corporate media to shellack the murder of the UN observers with sickening excuses. In addition to excuses, the Chicago Tribune felt compelled, as a standard lickspittle for Israeli crimes, to powder puff the invasion:

 

“The experience for the U.N. Interim Force in Lebanon, or UNIFIL, has not been a good one. In place since 1978 and comprising soldiers from France, Poland, India, Italy and a few other countries, UNIFIL was unable to stop the July 12 Hezbollah border raid that resulted in the kidnapping of two Israeli soldiers. It was also unable to block retaliating Israeli troops from entering Lebanon a few days later.”

 

As we know, the Israeli soldiers were captured in Lebanon, as reported by Forbes, the Associated Press, ABC News, the Boston Herald, the Hindustan Times, the Bahrain News Agency, Deutsche Presse-Agentur, AFP, Asia Times, and others. For more on the ever-morphing story, see this blog entry.

 

But then, naturally, the Chicago Tribune would be bucking the pro-Israel corporate media stampede if it told the truth. Imagine Winston Smith rewriting historical documents so that they match the current party line, which changes on a daily basis, over at the Ministry of Truth, and you’ll get a good idea of what’s going on here.

 

One wonders what the response would be if the Palestinians and Lebanese “retaliated” against Israel for kidnapping their citizens, numbering in the hundreds.

 

Finally, according to the Washington Post, the IOF continued firing on the targeted shelter, even as rescue workers attempted to clear the rubble. But then this should not be surprising, as the surviving members of the USS Liberty, the intelligence ship attacked by Israel on June 8, 1967, will likely tell you. In that instance, our “friends” attacked lifeboats with torpedoes and machine gun fire, a war crime.

 

 

It seems the Israeli government are mighty fond of war crimes.

i'd like to know how someone living can ask for someone to stop killing them... its hypocrisy.

I will...

 

Good article:

 

 

 

WWIII and the New Status Quo Ante Agenda

Long term three world war agenda unfolding in the here and now

 

Steve Watson / Infowars | July 26 2006

 

Condoleeza Rice's statement today that a return to the 'political Status Quo Ante' is not an option is very revealing in terms of what we are to expect in the coming weeks months and years.

 

Despite the fact that every nation on the planet, barring the two globalist control centres of the US and the UK wants an immediate ceasefire and an end to the killing, a ceasefire is not what we are going to get.

 

What does this reveal about who is in control of modern political events? The elite few and not the many are running the entire show and what they say goes because they have the international bankers and their long established financial systems of enslavement onside to ply them with endless wealth to fund the killing and reap back the profits.

 

The political world is going to be changed for ever by a totally staged managed escalation of violence that will foment a pre-scripted third world war.

 

 

The US media is for the most part hideously spewing out what will inevitably be written in the history books. Today's Chicago Times editorial succinctly sums up the total falsehood that may become known as the catalytic event after 9/11 that started World War Three:

 

Hezbollah started this conflict by invading Israel and killing and kidnapping soldiers...

 

In reality it is the exact opposite that is the case. Israel sent troops over the Lebanese border into the South of the country and then claimed the captured invaders were "kidnap victims" and launched their attacks.

 

The Associated press reported this, The AFP reported this, the Hindustan Times reported this, the Bahrain News Agency reported this, The Deutsche Presse-Agentur reported this, The Asia Times reported this, voltairenet reported this. in fact every foreign media outlet reported this, yet the US media reports that the exact opposite happened.

 

It has also now been revealed that Israeli spy networks, long in operation in Lebanon, were on alert, scoping out targets to be destroyed four days before the two Israeli soldiers were captured in Lebanon.

 

The Jeruslaem post reported on the 12th of July that only weeks ago, an entire reserve division was drafted in order to train for the operation along the northern border. In the same report a very high ranking military officer said that if the captured soldiers were not returned in good condition, Israel would turn Lebanon back 20 years by striking its vital infrastructure.

 

Clearly whether the vital infrastructure of Lebanon was under the control of Hezbollah or not was not an issue for Israel.

 

"The IDF holds the Lebanese government responsible for any act of terror launched from Lebanon at Israel," a statement released by the IDF spokesperson read.

 

More from the Chicago Times:

 

If Hezbollah wants a cease-fire--and there's little evidence of that--it would be simple to accomplish...

 

Little evidence? What about the fact there was an immediate offer by Hezbollah to release the soldiers, as well as long term hostage and IDF soldier Gilad Shalit, in exchange for thousands of security prisoners? The offer of an immediate truce and talks has again been seemingly snubbed today by Israel.

 

Simple to accomplish? So what about the indiscriminate wiping out by Israel of Lebanese civilians, the airport and even United Nations outposts, killing UN observers ON PURPOSE despite repeated warnings. What about the repeated statements, from the Prime Minister of Israel Ehud Olmert, that the bombing will not stop. Is all that a side issue?

 

The activities of Israel are a fuse that has been lit to ignite the order out of chaos agenda in the middle east that will eventually lead to all out war, the systematic destruction of sovereignty throughout the region and endless globalist occupation and plundering. No one can now deny that the level the violence has been taken to is totally out of all proportion to the events used to justify it. Anyone can see that this has gone beyond a matter of destroying a loosely organized foreign movement. Even State leaders admit the leadership of Israel is pursuing wider agendas.

 

 

The globalist agenda for a third world war focused on the middle east has been long spoken of and written about.

 

In 1826; Captain William Morgan published an exposure of the powerful masonic movement that had been long infiltrated at the highest levels by the European Illuminati movement. Morgan decided it was his duty to inform all Masons and the general public what the full proof was regarding the Illuminati, their secret plans, intended objectives, and to reveal the identities of the masterminds of the conspiracy.

 

Morgan wrote:

 

World War III is to be fomented, using the so-called controversies; by the agents of the Illuminati operating under whatever new name; that are now being stored up between the political Zionists and the leaders of the Moslem world.

 

That war is to be directed in such a manner that all of Islam and political Zionism will destroy each other while at the same time; the remaining nations, once more divided on this issue, will be forced to fight themselves into a state of complete exhaustion; physically, mentally, spiritually, and economically.

 

Zionism at this time was not an established term or movement, it was unheard of yet here we have a Mason writing openly about it as a future force in the world.

 

The writing of Albert Pike, the Grand Commander of American Freemasonry, later in 1871 also reveals the same Masonic/Illuminati agenda. Predicting both the first and second world wars would lead to the break up of Germany, the expansion of Communist Russia and the establishment of the State of Israel. The next 75 years and beyond unfolded exactly as Pike described.

 

 

Pike wrote:

 

The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World,

 

The [third] war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. The rest of the world will be drawn in. "Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion...

 

Pike stated that after World War III is ended; those who will aspire to undisputed world-domination will provoke the greatest social-cataclysm the world has ever known, an all powerful malevolent unipolar world order. He stated that the agenda was to "unleash the nihilists and the atheists" and bring this about via "a general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and Atheism; both conquered and exterminated at the same time."

 

Essentially Pike foresaw that in order to bring about the Illuminati vision of an all conquering world government, the previously established strong hold religions must be pitted against each other AND against Atheist Communism, exhausting all beliefs and political systems to the point where the world cannot look back to the former Status Quo Ante and must await a new beginning.

 

The turmoil in the Middle East is the start of this new beginning.

 

The centre of power amongst the globalists, or "those who will aspire to undisputed world-domination" as Pike put it, may have shifted, evolved, grown and changed over the last century, but it seems that the overall order out of chaos agenda is still as it was.

 

 

typical lefty. a cease fire plays right into the terrorist stratigy. they want ot be able to attack israel anytime and kill people and as soon as israel strikes back they want to hide and beg for a cease fire. this would only help them, they would rebuild and attack israel again. israel has a right AND A DUTY to make sure this doesnt happen again.

 

im sick of anti semetism, they were attacked first and they respond and are the evil ones? hizabollah is laughing right now because it has the support of the world. truly sad. all hizabollah has to do is play into the middle east and european anti semetism and it wins. but its what i expected, its what europe and the middle east do, and the terrorist know how to play everyone, and sadly europe is full of people like you who buy into their b.s.

As an American' date=' I can second this point. It's absolutely true, though my government never told me it was. I wonder why?[/quote']

 

Oh so bush called up the terrorist and said attack israel?

i never said that. the arabs are trying to do a holocaust on the jews.

 

oh, well u shouldnt say that either.

I live here and i dont think that. After learning so much about it, and having grandparents that are ww2 survivors, i know that there's no way we can even compare

oh, well u shouldnt say that either.

I live here and i dont think that. After learning so much about it, and having grandparents that are ww2 survivors, i know that there's no way we can even compare

 

im not saying its like that, but its what many of these extremist want. and wish could happen again and are trying to make it happen, but since israel is so powerful they cant come close.

u know gazeboflossUK, u keep acting like you're showing the full picture, like u know everything that's going on and so u made up your opinion about things reading through articles like the ones u present here.

And u claim others are lead by wrong information?!

Half of that article is lies!

And, u only present one side of the story, and u say u know all the information- how come u neglect the fact the 8 isreali soldiers were killed yesterday?

because to him that does not matter, he's been tricked by the terrorist. they are playing this war brilliantly.

Perhaps he's just being objective' date=' unlike furious emotionally clouded natives.[/quote']

 

the writer of this article is not objective, I dont believe anyone is objective when it comes to political opinions. Expressing your opinion as an outsider can mean u got all your information from different sources and made up your mind- so u were objective.

Writing an article of lies, that's subjective. And articles like this just show how the media is presenting israel as the evil one in the whole story

 

and i cant believe someone here once said that the media is pro israel. Whoever said that is obviously not watching enough news.

because to him that does not matter' date=' he's been tricked by the terrorist. they are playing this war brilliantly.[/quote']

 

that's true... he's the one that's most influenced by the media- and he claims we're the fools?

 

it's sad really....

that's true... he's the one that's most influenced by the media- and he claims we're the fools?

 

it's sad really....

 

Exactly.

no one ever said hypocrisy is non-existant. in gareth's case certainly not.

What GazeboflossUK and most people seem not to understand is, israel didnt start this. they were attacked and attacked back. i could see why people would be mad if israel just went out looking for trouble, but its quite the opposite. trouble came to them and they had no choice but to act. its truly sad when people know this but still want to blame israel for what hizabollah started, this is EXACTLY what they wanted. they KNOW they couldnt do shit agaisnt israel's military, but they can turn the world even more agaisnt them and get support for themselves out of this. the sad part is many people are playing right into their bold stratigy. GazeboflossUK is just a prime example of this. suckered by the real bad guys. but i have to give them that they are playing this war brilliantly. all they had to do was prey on the mid east and europes hatred of the jews and thats exactly what they are doing. and once more the world is trying its best to hurt the jews, but its nothing new, people have been doing this for thousands of years.

What GazeboflossUK and most people seem not to understand is' date=' israel didnt start this. they were attacked and attacked back. i could see why people would be mad if israel just went out looking for trouble, but its quite the opposite. trouble came to them and they had no choice but to act. its truly sad when people know this but still want to blame israel for what hizabollah started, this is EXACTLY what they wanted. they KNOW they couldnt do shit agaisnt israel's military, but they can turn the world even more agaisnt them and get support for themselves out of this. the sad part is many people are playing right into their bold stratigy. GazeboflossUK is just a prime example of this. suckered by the real bad guys. but i have to give them that they are playing this war brilliantly. all they had to do was prey on the mid east and europes hatred of the jews and thats exactly what they are doing. and once more the world is trying its best to hurt the jews, but its nothing new, people have been doing this for thousands of years.[/quote']

 

yeah. too true. welcome to the site by the way! good to see not everyone is against israel.

Israel has some supporters, albeit a small amount, but its better then none.

What GazeboflossUK and most people seem not to understand is' date=' israel didnt start this. they were attacked and attacked back. i could see why people would be mad if israel just went out looking for trouble, but its quite the opposite. .[/quote']

There is something very important missing here...

what about going into someones country and telling the people that have lived there for 1000's of years... 'its ours now'. As that part seems to be missing.... :rolleyes:

There is something very important missing here...

what about going into someones country and telling the people that have lived there for 1000's of years... 'its ours now'. As that part seems to be missing.... :rolleyes:

 

whose country? surely you don't mean jews in israel?

Yes.... they chose to dessert the place and go to europe and fruther a field......its was no longer rightlfully theres...

I suggest you read the bible, its very well documented in there espically around the old testement...

 

Also their recent actions seems to reflect old testament practices...

and they can not speak about suicide bombers, one of the most celebrated heros in the bible was sansom, where its written he killed over 3000 people... when he died...

u are a fool. bart the jews went to europe because the babylonians exiled them from israel. know ur facts dude. and besides muslims came after jews. jews were there first ( before muhammed)

Have u read the bible ??

you poorly educated redneck....

 

I think not as you will know, they rejected the land... and thats why the bobalyons moved in read the book of Daniel !

Oh I guess that would be too close to the truth, something of which you have trouble in grasping.. !

also you are wrong on the bit about the israelis being their first, they were in eygpt before coming to isreal formally known as Canan and they eliminated the people from there... just like they did 50 years ago !

i'm a poorly educated redneck? how can you judge that. i go to the best non selective school in victoria, and duxed my year level during end of year exams. Not to mention a mark of 92 in biblical studies, so know who ur talking to.

 

i guess ur palestinian, to say the jew rejected the land. speaking of rejection i'm not sure if my memory is correct but if i'm correct the palestinians rejected the '48 UN mandate as well as the 2000 Barak offer, which gave them control over jerusalem as well as about 40% of israel.

 

please know your facts dude, you only insult yourself not others being a pseudointellectual.

OK then please point out the errors I have made that are written in the bible...

I am not palestinian but I strongly belive they should be treated better.... as humans not near humans as they currently are

no. you tell me where it says we 'rejected' the land we were given after slavery in egypt ? because i cannot find a skeric of information hinting to such a conclusion. maybe you have missinterperetted information incorrectly.