February 6, 201016 yr Exactly. I mean, it's really sad to think about her. She was alive and awake when she was put down there, and knowing that her family did it is just sick.
February 6, 201016 yr Exactly. Great discussion there Mark, you agree that a violent murderer is a freak. You deserve a medal for your powers of deduction.
February 6, 201016 yr Talk about being a little over protective :rolleyes: but seriously this guy should be shot... how the hell can you kill your own daughter? Sick people in this world.
February 6, 201016 yr We should send him to Daily Mail Island. Not many people will actually know what you are referencing here <3
February 7, 201016 yr That's horrible, how can anyone kill his own daughter?:shocked2: we used to read stories about stuff like that but i had no idea it still happened, i know about lashing and people being sentenced to prison for life for pointless reasons but this is just sick, unimaginable and cruel...and for what?
February 7, 201016 yr Author That's horrible, how can anyone kill his own daughter?:shocked2: we used to read stories about stuff like that but i had no idea it still happened, i know about lashing and people being sentenced to prison for life for pointless reasons but this is just sick, unimaginable and cruel...and for what? That's why fundamental religious views are so dangerous.:angry:
February 7, 201016 yr Author In saying that, aren't you suggesting that we kill religion? :thinking: Nah. Just religious extremism.;)
February 7, 201016 yr Mark, I think you'd like Pat Condell (I think that's how you spell his name). Look him up on youtube.
February 8, 201016 yr Wrong, because the more this kind of thing is exposed, the more chance there is that something will be done to stop such evil practices taking place. Such stories need to be reported to show the world what's going on, therefore the media should be applauded and congratulated.;) Ahahahahaha Newspapers exist to SELL a story. That's how they make profit and print more copies, derrrr. Of course they're going to publish a story that will generate a shocking headline! It's going to sell! Like with tabloids, different shit, same smell (I think that's how the saying goes anyway). This statement of yours, truly, it is one of the most amusing I have seen. Well done Mark for being milked for money.
February 8, 201016 yr It was incredibly irrelevant as well, in criticism of why he made this topic, he comes out with that. "therefore the media should be applauded and congratulated" That was the icing! I literally lol'd when I first read that. Especially in terms of the Daily Mail, who are second to none in terms of reporting in sensationalist form and only focussing on stories and headlines which instil fear into the average human.
February 8, 201016 yr Author Especially in terms of the Daily Mail, who are second to none in terms of reporting in sensationalist form and only focussing on stories and headlines which instil fear into the average human. The thing is, that's every bit as biased a stance as you're accusing the Daily Mail of, which is ridiculous.:rolleyes: That's a very easy bandwagon to jump on.:dozey:
February 8, 201016 yr Author Newspapers exist to SELL a story. That's how they make profit and print more copies, derrrr. Of course they're going to publish a story that will generate a shocking headline! It's going to sell! Like with tabloids, different shit, same smell (I think that's how the saying goes anyway). All media acts the same way (albeit with different angles), and that doesn't make the story any less valid, unless, of course, you're suggesting it's been totally fabricated.:rolleyes:
February 8, 201016 yr Please point out where I suggest it's been totally fabricated. Why would anyone believe a paper that makes up everything it tries to publish when you have such technologies as the one we are using right now? Seems silly to suggest that, at least in my eyes.
February 8, 201016 yr Author Please point out where I suggest it's been totally fabricated. Why would anyone believe a paper that makes up everything it tries to publish when you have such technologies as the one we are using right now? Seems silly to suggest that, at least in my eyes. Then you have to accept that it's a perfectly legitimate news item.;)
February 8, 201016 yr Feel free to also point out where I was dismissing that it was a legitimate news item. I may have been making the point that newspapers ultimately must sell a story, but unless grossly you misinterpreted my post...
February 8, 201016 yr Author Feel free to also point out where I was dismissing that it was a legitimate news item. I may have been making the point that newspapers ultimately must sell a story, but unless grossly you misinterpreted my post... In that case, I would say your points are totally irrelevant to the topic.:smug:
February 8, 201016 yr Because you cannot direct your rebuttals relevantly at the points I try to make or because there is some flaw in said points? Once again, please, feel free to show me in the right direction and point a flaw out, I'm curious now since you seemingly don't want to.
February 8, 201016 yr Way to just bluntly dismiss my post when I extend an offering to prove me wrong. This is actually quite amusing.
February 8, 201016 yr Author ^What's really amusing is your ridiculous (and futile) attempt to start an argument out of nothing. Therefore, unless you have something to say that's on-topic, there is nothing further to discuss.
February 8, 201016 yr Lol, I'm not trying to start an argument. I'm quite chill at the moment actually, I've had two days of being happier than the norm for the past few months :smiley:
Create an account or sign in to comment