LOOOOOOOOOOOOL BLANKETS

I found more than enough links to prove it, so it was game over.:smug:

I read it. Twice.

Game over.

True, but they sure look like them!!

 

:lol:

 

Again.. not funny.

I read it. Twice.

Game over.

 

Exactly. Same for Murray!!:D

He was mocking you, you bellend

 

He's actually read the Qur'an

Again.. not funny.

 

......................hilarious, in fact.:rolleyes:

Exactly. Same for Murray!!:D

That post is directed to you, Mark.

......................hilarious, in fact.:rolleyes:

 

No it freaking isn't, that's so disrespectful.

He was mocking you, you bellend

 

He's actually read the Qur'an

Exactly. ;)

Mark, I just don't understand how you can believe every single thing you read in the Daily Mail. You live in a foreign country yourself so I assume you know what it's like to be an immigrant. How do you feel about German newspapers which promote similar ideas?

Exactly. ;)

 

And if you have, you will know there is nothing in there whatsoever that states that women have to be completely covered up from head to toe.;)

Mark, You live in a foreign country yourself

 

Did I miss something?

 

Maaaark, I said it twice, I'll say it again

 

Don't act like you've read it because you haven't

"Please tell your wives and daughters and faithful

women to wear a covering dress on their bodies. That would

be good. Then nobody can recognise them and harrass

them. Allah is merciful and kind." (Surah Al Hijaab 33: 59)

 

I'm done with this. Please be more respectful on the other time.

I don't think we really need this thread.

 

Sorry for any grammatical errors.

I believe the term that would be used here is

 

PWNED

"Please tell your wives and daughters and faithful

women to wear a covering dress on their bodies. That would

be good. Then nobody can recognise them and harrass

them. Allah is merciful and kind." (Surah Al Hijaab 33: 59)

 

I'm done with this. Please be more respectful other time.

I don't think we really need this thread.

 

Sorry for any grammatical errors.

 

Doesn't say anything about being covered from head to toe.;)

I believe the term that would be used here is

 

PWNED

 

I believe the term that is appropriate for you is BANNED!!:laugh3:

Ah yes because everything that Christianity upholds is all directly from the bible, they didn't modify anything afterwards at all did they?

 

Don't be a dickhead Mark, I know it's hard because you are one, but seriously...

I believe the term that is appropriate for you is BANNED!!:laugh3:

 

HAHAHAHAHAHA

 

OH MY GOD YOU JUST OWNED ME

Why did you ignore my post?

Why did you ignore my post?

 

Becasue that's what he does Sally, he ignores points, it's basically impossible to argue with him.

I believe the term that is appropriate for you is BANNED!!:laugh3:

 

It's so funny to see how you ignore the posts with valid points, and turn the discussion to banning Nathan.

I believe the term that is appropriate for you is BANNED!!:laugh3:

No. He got his points and you can't use that 'banned' excuse just to keep yourself winning.

 

Why did you ignore my post?

I don't. :)

 

Ah yes because everything that Christianity upholds is all directly from the bible, they didn't modify anything afterwards at all did they?

Agree.

It's so funny to see how you ignore the posts with valid points, and turn the discussion to banning Nathan.

 

He's already banned, which is the most valid point of all.;)

He's already banned, which is the most valid point of all.;)

 

Amazing.

He's already banned, which is the most valid point of all.;)

 

And it's even more valid cuz that's old news.

 

Focus on the topic and be more respectful about people's beliefs